Wei Diao1, Fangfang Tian1, Zhiyun Jia2. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China. Electronic address: jzygood@scu.edu.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) measured in the primary lesion and axillary lymph nodes (ALN) by pretreatment fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The primary prognosis endpoint was event-free survival (EFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) was estimated by using random-effects model according to the results of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Fifteen eligible studies with 3574 breast cancer patients were included. For EFS, patients with higher primary SUVmax showed a poorer survival prognosis with pooled HR of 1.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40-2.73). The combined HR of high SUVmax in ALN and ALN-to-primary SUVmax ratio (N/T ratio) were 1.89 (95% CI 0.70-5.07) and 2.06 (95% CI 0.59-7.21), respectively. In analyzing invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) patients, the pooled HR was 1.91 (95% CI 1.40-2.64). For OS, the pooled HR of SUVmax in primary lesion and ALN were 0.64 (95% CI 0.23-1.84) and 1.09 (95% CI 0.07-16.53), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggested that patients with high primary SUVmax may experience a higher risk for recurrence or a poor progression. Moreover, the SUVmax of 18F-FDG showed a significant prognostic value in IDC patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) measured in the primary lesion and axillary lymph nodes (ALN) by pretreatment fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The primary prognosis endpoint was event-free survival (EFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) was estimated by using random-effects model according to the results of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Fifteen eligible studies with 3574 breast cancerpatients were included. For EFS, patients with higher primary SUVmax showed a poorer survival prognosis with pooled HR of 1.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40-2.73). The combined HR of high SUVmax in ALN and ALN-to-primary SUVmax ratio (N/T ratio) were 1.89 (95% CI 0.70-5.07) and 2.06 (95% CI 0.59-7.21), respectively. In analyzing invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) patients, the pooled HR was 1.91 (95% CI 1.40-2.64). For OS, the pooled HR of SUVmax in primary lesion and ALN were 0.64 (95% CI 0.23-1.84) and 1.09 (95% CI 0.07-16.53), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggested that patients with high primary SUVmax may experience a higher risk for recurrence or a poor progression. Moreover, the SUVmax of 18F-FDG showed a significant prognostic value in IDC patients.
Authors: Sun Young Chae; Seol Hoon Park; Hyo Sang Lee; Jin-Hee Ahn; Sung-Bae Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Jeong Eun Kim; Sei Hyun Ahn; Byung Ho Son; Jong Won Lee; Beom Seok Ko; Hee Jeong Kim; Gyungyub Gong; Jungsu S Oh; Seo Young Park; Dae Hyuk Moon Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Jorianne Boers; Erik F J de Vries; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Geke A P Hospers; Carolina P Schröder Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 5.075
Authors: Young Hoon Choi; Sang Hyub Lee; Min Su You; Bang Sup Shin; Woo Hyun Paik; Ji Kon Ryu; Yong-Tae Kim; Wooil Kwon; Jin-Young Jang; Sun-Whe Kim Journal: Gut Liver Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 4.519
Authors: Thomas Helmberger; Rita Golfieri; Maciej Pech; Thomas Pfammatter; Dirk Arnold; Roberto Cianni; Geert Maleux; Graham Munneke; Olivier Pellerin; Bora Peynircioglu; Bruno Sangro; Niklaus Schaefer; Niels de Jong; José Ignacio Bilbao Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 2.740