Literature DB >> 34103577

Relationship of the standard uptake value of 18F-FDG-PET-CT with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast tumors measuring ≥ 1 cm.

Soeun Park1,2, Eun-Ki Min1, Soong June Bae1, Chihwan Cha1,3, Dooreh Kim1, Janghee Lee1,4, Yoon Jin Cha5, Sung Gwe Ahn6, Joon Jeong1.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests that tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) compete for glucose in the tumor microenvironment and that tumor metabolic parameters correlate with localized immune markers in several solid tumors. We investigated the relationship of the standardized uptake value (SUV) of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET-CT) with stromal TIL levels in breast cancer. We included 202 patients who underwent preoperative 18F-FDG-PET-CT and had a tumor measuring ≥ 1 cm. Maximum SUV (SUVmax) was determined using 18F-FDG-PET-CT. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors related to high TIL levels (≥ 40%). All tumors were treatment naïve. A significant and weak correlation existed between continuous SUVmax and continuous TIL levels (p = 0.002, R = 0.215). Tumors with high SUVmax (≥ 4) had higher mean TIL levels than those with low SUVmax (< 4). In multivariable analysis, continuous SUVmax was an independent factor associated with high TIL levels; each 1-unit increment in SUVmax corresponded to an odds ratio of 1.14 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.29) for high TIL levels. Our study implies that SUV is associated with TILs in breast cancer and provides clinical evidence that elevated glucose uptake by breast tumors can predict the immune system-activated tumor micromilieu.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34103577      PMCID: PMC8187353          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91404-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is an ensemble of non-tumor cells including immune cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells[1] and affects tumor development and progression through dynamic interactions with cancer cells[2]. Identification of TME interplays depending on the tumor’s metabolic activity has revealed that the TME regulates tumor metabolism[3]. A previous study has reported that the demand for glucose is increased in tumor cells and tumor-specific immune cells, and this competition for glucose uptake between tumor cells and immune cells can directly influence cancer progression[4]. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are a cellular component of the immune system in the TME. Several clinical trials have reported the prognostic and predictive importance of TILs in breast cancer. In these trials, TIL levels have been highlighted as a biomarker for predicting treatment response to chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer[5-8]. The studies also found that tumors with high TIL levels have shown favorable prognosis among triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) or human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer[7,9-12]. Furthermore, high TIL levels are associated with high-proliferative, high-grade, estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors and higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rates[8,13-17]. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET-CT) provides important tumor-related qualitative and quantitative information on cancer based on glucose metabolism[18]. For breast cancer, a high maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) is related to tumor aggressiveness, advanced stage, and poor prognosis[19-23]. To identify the relationship between tumor metabolic status and tumor immunogenicity, recent studies have reported the correlations between SUVmax and immune markers in gastric cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and breast cancer[24-29]. In this study, we aimed to explore the correlation between the SUVmax of 18F-FDG-PET-CT and stromal TIL levels in breast cancer.

Results

Baseline characteristics

The characteristics of the 202 patients included in this study are summarized in Table 1. The median patient age was 53.2 years. Most tumors were invasive ductal carcinoma (86.1%) and showed favorable biology such as histological grade I or II (77.2%), nuclear grade 1 or 2 (66.3%), luminal/HER2(−) (71.8%), and low Ki-67 labeling index (L.I.) (55.0%). More than half of the tumors had a small tumor burden; 58.4% tumors had T stage 1 and 73.3% tumors were node-negative. The median SUVmax was 4.68, and the median TIL level was 15%.
Table 1

Patient characteristics.

Number (%)
Age (years), median (range)53.2 (24–87)
Histology
 Invasive ductal carcinoma174 (86.1)
 Invasive lobular carcinoma17 (8.4)
 Others11 (5.4)
T stage
 1118 (58.4)
 280 (39.6)
 34 (2.0)
N stage
 0148 (73.3)
 145 (22.3)
 27 (3.5)
 32 (1.0)
Histologic grade1
 I or II156 (77.2)
 III45 (22.3)
Nuclear grade1
 1 or 2135 (66.3)
 365 (32.2)
ER positive163 (80.7)
PR positive137 (67.8)
HER2 positive242 (20.8)
Subtypes
 Luminal/HER2(−)145 (71.8)
 HER2(+)32 (15.8)
 TNBC25 (12.4)
Ki-67 labeling index1
  < 14%111 (55.2)
  ≥ 14%90 (44.6)
AR (%), mean (SD)87.01 (± 25.25)
SUV max, median (range)4.68 (0.63–18.54)
TIL (%), median (range)15 (5–95)

ER estrogen receptor, PR progesterone receptor, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer, AR androgen receptor, SUV standard uptake value, TIL tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.

1Missing value.

2HER2 positivity was defined as 3 + on immunohistochemistry or amplification on fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Patient characteristics. ER estrogen receptor, PR progesterone receptor, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer, AR androgen receptor, SUV standard uptake value, TIL tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. 1Missing value. 2HER2 positivity was defined as 3 + on immunohistochemistry or amplification on fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Tumor characteristics related to TIL levels

We evaluated the correlation between continuous TIL levels and continuous SUVmax using Pearson’s correlation analysis (Fig. 1). There was a significant and weak correlation between continuous SUVmax and continuous TILs (p = 0.002, Pearson’s r = 0.215).
Figure 1

Correlation between the continuous maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels.

Correlation between the continuous maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels. Next, we compared mean TILs according to tumor characteristics (Table 2). Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) showed significantly higher mean TIL levels than invasive lobular carcinoma or other histological cancer types. The mean TIL levels were higher in tumors with histological grade (HG) III than in those with HG I or II. Similarly, mean TIL levels were higher in tumors with nuclear grade (NG) 3 than in those with NG 1 or 2. Among the subtypes, luminal/HER2(-) tumors showed the lowest mean TIL levels. When divided by Ki-67 L.I. of 14%, tumors with high Ki-67 L.I. showed higher mean TIL levels than those with low Ki-67 L.I. We also compared mean TIL levels based on the categorized SUVmax with a cutoff value of 4[20,30]. Tumors with a high SUVmax value showed higher mean TIL levels than those with a low SUVmax value (p = 0.028, Mann–Whitney U test).
Table 2

Mean tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels (%) according to tumor characteristics.

NMean (SD)p value
Histology10.001
 IDC17424.20 (± 21.98)
 ILC1711.27 (± 11.20)
 Others1113.64 (± 26.77)
T stage20.426
 111821.03 (± 21.34)
 2–38424.19 (± 22.65)
N stage2
 014823.41 (± 23.37)0.536
 1–35419.85 (± 16.98)
Histologic grade2,3 < 0.001
 I or II15618.70 (± 19.68)
 III4535.74 (± 25.09)
Nuclear grade2,3 < 0.001
 1 or 213617.54 (± 17.86)
 36533.29 (± 25.99)
Subtypes1 < 0.001
 Luminal/HER2(−)14517.38 (± 15.90)
 HER2(+)3236.32 (± 27.97)
 TNBC2537.78 (± 29.58)
Ki-67 labeling index2,30.003
  < 14%11117.29 (± 17.45)
  ≥ 14%9028.21 (± 24.29)
SUVmax20.028
  < 48518.33 (± 21.25)
  ≥ 411725.33 (± 22.10)

IDC invasive ductal carcinoma, ILC invasive lobular carcinoma, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer, SUV standard uptake value, SD standard deviation.

1Kruskal–Wallis test.

2Mann–Whitney U test.

3Missing value.

Mean tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels (%) according to tumor characteristics. IDC invasive ductal carcinoma, ILC invasive lobular carcinoma, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer, SUV standard uptake value, SD standard deviation. 1Kruskal–Wallis test. 2Mann–Whitney U test. 3Missing value.

Predictive factors for tumors with high TIL levels

We identified factors predicting TIL levels ≥ 40% using logistic regression analysis (Table 3). In univariable analysis, the significant variables were age, HG, NG, tumor subtypes, Ki-67 L.I., androgen receptor (AR) percentage, and continuous SUVmax. Because the tumor subtypes were decided based on a combination of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status, only tumor subtype was included in the multivariable model to avoid collinearity of variables. In multivariable analysis, tumor subtypes and continuous SUVmax remained an independent variable associated with high TIL levels, and NG was marginally significant (p = 0.050) for predicting high TIL levels. When the SUVmax increased by 1 unit, the probability of high TIL levels increased by 14% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.011–1.285, p = 0.032).
Table 3

Predictive factors for tumors with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels.

Univariable analysisMultivariable analysis
ORs (95% CIs)p valueORs (95% CIs)p value
Age1.029 (0.997–1.061)0.0741.017 (0.982–1.054)0.337
Histology
 IDCRef0.202
 ILC0.209 (0.027–1.628)0.135
 Others0.335 (0.042–2.697)0.304
T stage
 1Ref
 2–31.540 (0.778–3.048)0.216
N stage
 0Ref
 1–30.824 (0.374–1.816)0.631
Histologic grade
 I or IIRef
 III4.873 (2.323–10.223) < 0.0011.508 (0.534–4.255)0.438
Nuclear grade
 1 or 2Ref
 34.375 (2.145–8.923) < 0.0012.248 (1.0005.053)0.050
ER( +) (Ref: ( −))0.234 (0.109–0.503) < 0.001
PR( +) (Ref: ( −))0.258 (0.127–0.524) < 0.001
HER2( +) (Ref: ( −))3.172 (1.496–6.722)0.003
Subtypes
 Luminal/HER2( −)Ref < 0.001
 HER2( +)5.856 (2.472–13.873) < 0.0013.166 (1.2188.229)0.018
 TNBC5.916 (2.316–15.112) < 0.0013.706 (1.32910.340)0.012
Ki-67 labeling index ≥ 14% (Ref: <14%)3.922 (1.863–8.258) < 0.0011.512 (0.604–3.785)0.377
AR (%)0.984 (0.972–9.995)0.0051.001 (0.983–1.020)0.879
SUVmax1.211 (1.092–1.344) < 0.0011.140 (1.0111.285)0.032

Bold font is used to also highlight statistically significant values.

ANC absolute neutrophil count, ALC absolute lymphocyte count, ER estrogen receptor, HER-2 human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, IDC invasive ductal carcinoma, PR progesterone receptor, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, AR androgen receptor, ILC invasive lobular carcinoma.

Predictive factors for tumors with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels. Bold font is used to also highlight statistically significant values. ANC absolute neutrophil count, ALC absolute lymphocyte count, ER estrogen receptor, HER-2 human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, IDC invasive ductal carcinoma, PR progesterone receptor, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, AR androgen receptor, ILC invasive lobular carcinoma. Additionally, to evaluate the predictive ability of continuous SUVmax for TIL levels ≥ 40%, we determined the area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The ROC curve for SUVmax in relation to TIL levels yielded an AUC of 0.673 (95% CI: 0.582–0.764, p = 0.001; Fig. 2).
Figure 2

Area under the curve of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) predicting tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels ≥ 40%

Area under the curve of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) predicting tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels ≥ 40%

Discussion

In this study, we found an association between TIL levels and SUVmax in breast cancer (≥ 1 cm). Tumors with a high SUVmax value showed a higher mean TIL level than those with a low SUVmax value and there was a correlation between continuous SUVmax and TIL level. In multivariable analysis, SUVmax was an independent factor for predicting tumors with high TIL levels. Correlations between SUVmax and TIL levels have been previously reported in non-small cell lung cancer and gastric cancer. In non-small cell lung cancer, SUVmax was correlated with CD8(+) TILs as well as CD163(+) tumor-associated macrophages, FoxP3(+) Treg cells, and PD-1(+) and PD-L1(+) cells[24]. In gastric cancer, SUVmax showed a marginal association with CD3(+) lymphocytes and a significant association with FoxP3(+) Treg cells[25]. In breast cancer, the relationship between SUVmax and TIL levels has been addressed in recent studies. Sasada et al. investigated this relationship using both whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) and dedicated breast PET (DbPET)[29]. SUVmax correlated with TILs in both whole-body PET and DbPET, and only DbPET was related to TIL levels after propensity score matching analysis. They suggested that DbPET could be more accurate in assessing fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in breast cancer, and their findings are in line with our finding that SUVmax is associated with TIL levels. Collectively, the abovementioned studies support our findings and suggest that SUVmax could have a potential role in assessing the immune system-activated tumor micromilieu. In addition, these findings indicate that SUVmax can be a potential biomarker associated with immune-targeting therapy. In the study conducted by Hirakata et al.[26], there were significant associations between SUVmax and PD-L1(+) TIL levels and between SUVmax and TIL levels. Since PD-L1 expression in immune cells has already been used in clinical practice to determine the use of atezolizumab as an anti-PD-L1-targeting monoclonal antibody in metastatic breast cancer[31,32], it is worthwhile to address the predictive function of SUVmax in relation to the response of immune-check point inhibitors (ICIs). Moreover, our previous genomic study revealed that Transforming growth factor (TGF) pathway genes, which attenuate the response to ICIs[33], were significantly downregulated in tumors with a high SUV value[34]. Further, we found that the SUV signature was significantly associated with ICI responsiveness and improved overall survival in patients with urothelial cancer treated with ICIs. Taken together, our findings provide evidence that SUVmax can be assessed in terms of ICI responsiveness in breast cancer. Our study has several limitations. First, this was a retrospective study conducted in a single institution, and there was a difference between patient characteristics, especially tumor subtypes. Because we excluded patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, there were a small number of cases with more aggressive tumor types (HER2(+) or TNBC) and advanced disease. To overcome this, multivariable analysis was performed to demonstrate the independent capability of SUVmax in predicting high TIL levels. Second, although we used previously reported cutoff values for TIL levels and SUVmax, there are no standard cutoff values. Third, more specific immune biomarkers such as PD-L1 or the subpopulations of TILs were not assessed. A more detailed analysis is needed to comprehensively understand the mechanism underlying the relationship between TIL levels and SUVmax. Lastly, survival analysis was not performed due to the short follow-up period. Assessment of clinical outcomes could be helpful in identifying the prognostic capability of this relationship. Despite these shortcomings, our study has the advantage of enrolling the largest number of patients thus far. In conclusion, we found associations between the SUVmax of 18F-FDG-PET-CT and stromal TIL levels in breast cancer. These results suggest that elevated glucose uptake in breast tumors can be used to predict the activation of the immune system in the TME. Further studies are warranted to comprehensively understand the interactions between the immune and metabolic systems in the TME and identify the clinical role of SUVmax of 18F-FDG-PET-CT in predicting TIL levels.

Methods

Patients

Between August 2016 and December 2017, we enrolled 202 patients with stage I-III breast cancer who underwent preoperative 18F-FDG-PET-CT followed by primary surgery at Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei College of Medicine, South Korea. In these patients, we successfully evaluated the SUVmax values and stromal TIL levels. To circumvent the effect of chemotherapy on SUVmax values and TIL levels, patients who underwent preoperative chemotherapy were excluded. To address more clear relationship between SUVmax and stromal TIL levels by reducing the partial-volume effect of PET[35], we included only patients with tumors measuring ≥ 1 cm. Clinical data on age at the time of surgery, HG, NG, tumor size, ER status, PR status, HER2 status, AR percentage, and Ki-67 L.I. were collected from the medical database. Tumors were classified according to the tumor–node–metastasis staging of the American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition, and tumor grade was determined using the modified Scarf-Bloomer-Richardson grading system[36]. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Gangnam Severance Hospital (Local IRB number: 2020-0950-001), which waived the requirement of informed consent due to the retrospective study design. The study was performed in accordance with good clinical practice guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki.

Assessment of TIL levels

TIL levels were measured as described in previous studies[37,38]. A pathologist (Y.J.C.) performed hematoxylin and eosin staining to review the histological features of treatment-naïve surgical specimens. Stromal TIL levels were evaluated according to the standardized methodology proposed by the international TIL Working Group[11]. The tumor area, defined by the presence of invasive tumor cells, was identified. All mononuclear cells including lymphocytes and plasma cells, but not polymorphonuclear leukocytes, were counted. The areas outside the tumor border, around the intraductal component, and around the normal lobules were excluded. Within the tumor border, areas showing crush artifacts and necrosis were also excluded. For each case, the average TIL level was measured using a representative section of the whole tumor, and the average level was reported as a percentage. In this study, the cutoff value of high TIL level was set as 40%, which was used to analyze associations between TIL levels and pathological CR (pCR) or event-free survival in the NeoALTTO study[39].

18F-FDG-PET-CT estimation

The procedure for 18F-FDG-PET-CT was the same as that previously reported[20]. After at least 8 h of fasting, patients received an intravenous injection of 18F-FDG (0.14 MBq) in the arm contralateral to the primary tumor. Sixty minutes after injection of 18F-FDG, whole-body positron emission tomography scans were obtained using a Philips Allegro PET camera (Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA). During the scans, patients were placed in the supine position with their arms raised. The SUV was calculated by measuring the 18F-FDG uptake by the primary tumor in the region of interest using the following formula: SUV = (maximal radioactivity concentration in the region of interest)/(injected dose/patient’s weight (kg)). The SUV cutoff value of 4 was determined according to previous studies[20,30,34].

Statistical analysis

Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to measure the correlation between continuous TIL levels and SUV. According to tumor characteristics, mean TILs levels were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test or Kruskal–Wallis test. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to test the normal distribution of TIL data. The distributions of nonparametric variables were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test or Kruskal–Wallis test. The clinicopathological factors associated with high TIL levels (≥ 40%) were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Variables that showed a significant difference (p < 0.10) in univariate analysis were entered in multivariable analysis. To evaluate the ability of continuous SUVmax to predict TIL levels ≥ 40%, we determined the AUC using ROC curves. All statistical tests were two tailed, and p < 0.05 was considered statistical significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 26.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
  39 in total

1.  Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Associations With Pathological Complete Response and Event-Free Survival in HER2-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer Treated With Lapatinib and Trastuzumab: A Secondary Analysis of the NeoALTTO Trial.

Authors:  Roberto Salgado; Carsten Denkert; Christine Campbell; Peter Savas; Paolo Nuciforo; Paolo Nucifero; Claudia Aura; Evandro de Azambuja; Holger Eidtmann; Catherine E Ellis; Jose Baselga; Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Stefan Michiels; Ian Bradbury; Christos Sotiriou; Sherene Loi
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in two phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trials.

Authors:  M V Dieci; M C Mathieu; V Guarneri; P Conte; S Delaloge; F Andre; A Goubar
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  FDG uptake reflects breast cancer immunological features: the PD-L1 expression and degree of TILs in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Tomoko Hirakata; Takaaki Fujii; Sasagu Kurozumi; Ayaka Katayama; Chikako Honda; Keiko Yanai; Shoko Tokuda; Yuko Nakazawa; Sayaka Obayashi; Reina Yajima; Kyoichi Kaira; Tetsunari Oyama; Ken Shirabe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion130): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Peter Schmid; Hope S Rugo; Sylvia Adams; Andreas Schneeweiss; Carlos H Barrios; Hiroji Iwata; Véronique Diéras; Volkmar Henschel; Luciana Molinero; Stephen Y Chui; Vidya Maiya; Amreen Husain; Eric P Winer; Sherene Loi; Leisha A Emens
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Atezolizumab and Nab-Paclitaxel in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Peter Schmid; Sylvia Adams; Hope S Rugo; Andreas Schneeweiss; Carlos H Barrios; Hiroji Iwata; Véronique Diéras; Roberto Hegg; Seock-Ah Im; Gail Shaw Wright; Volkmar Henschel; Luciana Molinero; Stephen Y Chui; Roel Funke; Amreen Husain; Eric P Winer; Sherene Loi; Leisha A Emens
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The relationship between FDG uptake in PET scans and biological behavior in breast cancer.

Authors:  Wataru Shimoda; Mitsuhiro Hayashi; Koji Murakami; Tetsunari Oyama; Masakatsu Sunagawa
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.239

7.  The effects of estrogen, progesterone, and C-erbB-2 receptor states on 18F-FDG uptake of primary breast cancer lesions.

Authors:  Ayse Mavi; Tevfik F Cermik; Muammer Urhan; Halis Puskulcu; Sandip Basu; Jian Q Yu; Hongming Zhuang; Brian Czerniecki; Abass Alavi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Tumour-infiltrating FOXP3(+) lymphocytes are associated with cytotoxic immune responses and good clinical outcome in oestrogen receptor-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  N R West; S E Kost; S D Martin; K Milne; R J Deleeuw; B H Nelson; P H Watson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Standardized uptake value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for prediction of tumor recurrence in breast cancer beyond tumor burden.

Authors:  Sung Gwe Ahn; Jong Tae Park; Hak Min Lee; Hak Woo Lee; Tae Joo Jeon; Kyunghwa Han; Seung Ah Lee; Seung Myung Dong; Young Hoon Ryu; Eun Ju Son; Joon Jeong
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Comparisons of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels and the 21-gene recurrence score in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Sung Gwe Ahn; Yoon Jin Cha; Soon June Bae; Chanik Yoon; Hak Woo Lee; Joon Jeong
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Radionuclide imaging and therapy directed towards the tumor microenvironment: a multi-cancer approach for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Circe D van der Heide; Simone U Dalm
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 9.236

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.