| Literature DB >> 30016967 |
Daniel Ebrahimi-Fakhari1, Lilian Lisa Mann2, Martin Poryo3, Norbert Graf4, Rüdiger von Kries5,6, Beate Heinrich6, Darius Ebrahimi-Fakhari7, Marina Flotats-Bastardas2, Ludwig Gortner2, Michael Zemlin2, Sascha Meyer2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) is a rare multisystem disorder. In 2012 diagnostic criteria for TSC were revised. However, data on the incidence of TSC are limited.Entities:
Keywords: Epidemiology; Everolimus; Incidence; Infantile spasms; Neurologic manifestations; Prenatal rhabdomyoma, hamartomas; Seizures; Tuberous sclerosis; mTOR
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30016967 PMCID: PMC6050673 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-018-0870-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Diagnostic criteria according to the 2012 International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Conference [9]
| Definite diagnosis: Two major diagnostic criteria or one major with greater than or equal two minor diagnostic criteria or the presence of a | |
| Major criteria: | • Cortical dysplasias (incl. tubers and cerebral white matter radial migration lines) |
| Minor criteria: | • ´Confetti´ skin lesions |
| Genetics: | Identification of either a |
(From: Northrup H, Krueger DA, on behalf of the International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Group. Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Diagnostic Criteria Update: Recommendations of the 2012 International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Conference. Pediatr Neurol 2013; 49: 243–254. © The authors. License Number 4341381420907)
a Pathogenic mutation: a mutation that clearly inactivates the function of the TSC1 or TSC2 proteins (e.g., out-of-frame indel or nonsense mutation), prevents protein synthesis (e.g., large genomic deletion), or is a missense mutation whose effect on protein function has been established by functional assessment (www.lovd.nl/TSC1, www.lovd/nl/TSC2 and Hoogeveen-Westerveld et al., 2012 and 2013). Other TSC1 or TSC2 variants whose effect on function is less certain do not meet these criteria, and are not sufficient to make a definite diagnosis of TSC. Note that 10 to 25% of TSC patients have no mutation identified by conventional genetic testing, and a normal result does not exclude TSC, or have any effect on the use of clinical diagnostic criteria to diagnose TSC
b A combination of the two major clinical features (lymphangioleiomyomatosis and angiomyolipomas) without other features does not meet criteria for a definite diagnosis
c Angiomyolipomas might also occur in the liver or other organ systems
Fig. 1Cumulative age distribution at first diagnosis
Fig. 2Clinical features leading to first diagnosis. * Including seizures, developmental delay, neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. autistic characteristics); multiple entries possible. Abbreviations: CNS (central nervous system); (n: number of patients)
Fig. 3Clinical features after comprehensive diagnostic work-up. The majority of patients presented with CNS involvement (cortical dysplasias 51.5% (44/86); subependymal nodules (SEN) 47.7% (41/86) and subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA) 5,8% (5/86). Followed by cardiac rhabydomyoma in 59.3% (51/86) and hypomelanotic macules in 53.5% (46/86). The other clinical symptoms were heterogeneous. (n: number of patients)
Fig. 4Tests used to establish the diagnosis. The most common diagnostic study performed was echocardiography in 90.7% (78/86), followed by ultrasound (cerebral or abdominal) in 89.5% (77/86). An electroencephalogram (EEG) was performed in 84.9% (73/86). Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) was obtained in 74.4% (64/86) as well as cranial CT imaging in 3 patients (3.4%). Formal skin examination was only performed in 33.7% (29/86), while cutaneous involvement was noted in 58.1% of all patients. (n: number of patients)