Literature DB >> 30015583

Procedure-specific CT Dose and Utilization Factors for CT-guided Interventional Procedures.

Kai Yang1, Suvranu Ganguli1, Matthew C DeLorenzo1, Hui Zheng1, Xinhua Li1, Bob Liu1.   

Abstract

Purpose To present procedure-specific radiation dose metric distributions and define quantitative CT utilization factors for CT-guided interventional procedures. Materials and Methods This single-center, retrospective study collected dictation reports and radiation dose data from 9143 consecutive CT-guided interventional procedures in adult patients from 2012 to 2017. Procedures were sorted into four major interventional categories: ablation, aspiration, biopsy, and drainage, each of which was further divided into subcategories. After exclusion, a total of 8213 procedures (4391 in men and 3822 in women) were divided into 21 subcategories. The mean patient age at examination for men was 62 years ± 15 (standard deviation; age range, 19-114 years), and for women it was 61 years ± 15 (age range, 19-113 years). Distributions of dose metrics and CT usage-related parameters were analyzed by category with descriptive statistic outcomes. Quantitative CT utilization factors (which measure average CT usage) for each interventional subcategory were derived by using total scan length, acquisition count, and number of images. Results Interventional CT scans have distinctly different dose metric characteristics from diagnostic CT scans. Wide variations of dose metrics were observed among subcategories, even within the same major category. For the most frequently performed CT-guided interventional procedures within each major category, liver ablation, chest aspiration, liver biopsy, and single abdominal drainage, the median dose-length product was 2351, 657, 1175, and 1125 mGy ∙ cm, respectively. Procedure-specific CT utilization factors ranged between 0.6 and 3.6. Conclusion This study provides procedure-specific CT dose metric distributions and quantitative CT utilization factors on the basis of a large number of procedures and categorization of CT-guided interventional procedures. © RSNA, 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30015583     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018172945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Radiation dose and image quality of CT fluoroscopy with partial exposure mode.

Authors:  Keisuke Takiguchi; Atsushi Urikura; Tsukasa Yoshida; Yoshihiro Nakaya; Masahiro Endo; Takeshi Aramaki
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  An interventional image-guided microdevice implantation and retrieval method for in-vivo drug response assessment.

Authors:  Sharath K Bhagavatula; Kunj Upadhyaya; Brendyn J Miller; Patrick Bursch; Alex Lammers; Michael J Cima; Stuart G Silverman; Oliver Jonas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Clinical evaluation of a robotic system for precise CT-guided percutaneous procedures.

Authors:  Shiran Levy; S Nahum Goldberg; Ido Roth; Moran Shochat; Jacob Sosna; Isaac Leichter; Sebastian Flacke
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-19

4.  Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT-guided procedures.

Authors:  A Kyle Jones; Meghan E Kisiel; X John Rong; Alda L Tam
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  Image-guided percutaneous ablation for the treatment of lung malignancies: current state of the art.

Authors:  Alfredo Páez-Carpio; Fernando M Gómez; Gemma Isus Olivé; Pilar Paredes; Tarik Baetens; Enrique Carrero; Marcelo Sánchez; Ivan Vollmer
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-04-29

6.  Robotic assistance for quick and accurate image-guided needle placement.

Authors:  Abigail J Fong; Camille L Stewart; Kelly Lafaro; Christopher J LaRocca; Yuman Fong; Joseph D Femino; Brooke Crawford
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-04

7.  Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy.

Authors:  Sebastian Zensen; Sumitha Selvaretnam; Marcel Opitz; Denise Bos; Johannes Haubold; Jens Theysohn; Michael Forsting; Nika Guberina; Axel Wetter
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.740

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.