Literature DB >> 30008046

Feasibility of directional percutaneous epicardial ablation with a partially insulated catheter.

Ammar M Killu1, Niyada Naksuk1, Faisal F Syed1, Christopher V DeSimone1, Prakriti Gaba2, Chance Witt1, Dorothy J Ladewig3, Scott H Suddendorf4, Joanne M Powers3, Gaurav Satam3, Zdeněk Stárek5, Tomas Kara5, Jiří Wolf5, Pavel Leinveber5, Michal Crha6, Miroslav Novák5, Charles J Bruce1, Paul A Friedman1, Samuel J Asirvatham7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of directional percutaneous epicardial ablation using a partially insulated catheter.
METHODS: Partially insulated catheter prototypes were tested in 12 (6 canine, 6 porcine) animal studies in two centers. Prototypes had interspersed windows to enable visualization of epicardial structures with ultrasound. Epicardial unipolar ablation and ablation between two electrodes was performed according to protocol (5-60 W power, 0-60 mls/min irrigation, 78 s mean duration).
RESULTS: Of 96 epicardial ablation attempts, unipolar ablation was delivered in 53.1%. Electrogram evidence of ablation, when analyzable, occurred in 75 of 79 (94.9%) therapies. Paired pre/post-ablation pacing threshold (N = 74) showed significant increase in pacing threshold post-ablation (0.9 to 2.6 mA, P < .0001). Arrhythmias occurred in 18 (18.8%) therapies (11 ventricular fibrillation, 7 ventricular tachycardia), mainly in pigs (72.2%). Coronary artery visualization was variably successful. No phrenic nerve injury was noted during or after ablation. Furthermore, there were minimal pericardial changes with ablation.
CONCLUSIONS: Epicardial ablation using a partially insulated catheter to confer epicardial directionality and protect the phrenic nerve seems feasible. Iterations with ultrasound windows may enable real-time epicardial surface visualization thus identifying coronary arteries at ablation sites. Further improvements, however, are necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ablation; Epicardial; Insulation; Pericardial; Phrenic nerve; Scar

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30008046     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-018-0404-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  20 in total

1.  Catheter ablation of ventricular epicardial tissue: a comparison of standard and cooled-tip radiofrequency energy.

Authors:  André d'Avila; Christopher Houghtaling; Paulo Gutierrez; Olivera Vragovic; Jeremy N Ruskin; Mark E Josephson; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Effects of radiofrequency energy delivered through partially insulated metallic catheter tips on myocardial tissue heating and ablation lesion characteristics.

Authors:  Duy T Nguyen; Joshua D Moss; Lijun Zheng; Janice Huang; Waseem Barham; William H Sauer
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation a multicenter safety study.

Authors:  Frédéric Sacher; Kurt Roberts-Thomson; Philippe Maury; Usha Tedrow; Isabelle Nault; Daniel Steven; Meleze Hocini; Bruce Koplan; Lionel Leroux; Nicolas Derval; Jens Seiler; Matthew J Wright; Laurence Epstein; Michel Haissaguerre; Pierre Jais; William G Stevenson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Safety and feasibility of closed chest epicardial catheter ablation using electroporation.

Authors:  Kars Neven; Vincent van Driel; Harry van Wessel; René van Es; Bastiaan du Pré; Pieter A Doevendans; Fred Wittkampf
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-08-25

5.  A new technique to perform epicardial mapping in the electrophysiology laboratory.

Authors:  E Sosa; M Scanavacca; A d'Avila; F Pilleggi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-06

6.  Epicardial phrenic nerve displacement during catheter ablation of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias: procedural experience and outcomes.

Authors:  Saurabh Kumar; Chirag R Barbhaiya; Samuel H Baldinger; Bruce A Koplan; Melanie Maytin; Laurence M Epstein; Roy M John; Gregory F Michaud; Usha B Tedrow; William G Stevenson
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-05-11

7.  Ablation lesion size correlates with pacing threshold: a physiological basis for use of pacing to assess ablation lesions.

Authors:  John L Sapp; Kyoko Soejima; Joshua M Cooper; Laurence M Epstein; William G Stevenson
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Electroanatomic substrate and ablation outcome for suspected epicardial ventricular tachycardia in left ventricular nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Oscar Cano; Mathew Hutchinson; David Lin; Fermin Garcia; Erica Zado; Rupa Bala; Michael Riley; Joshua Cooper; Sanjay Dixit; Edward Gerstenfeld; David Callans; Francis E Marchlinski
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Periprocedural 3D imaging of the left atrium and esophagus: comparison of different protocols of 3D rotational angiography of the left atrium and esophagus in group of 547 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation of the complex atrial arrhythmias.

Authors:  Zdenek Starek; František Lehar; Jiri Jez; Jiri Wolf; Tomas Kulik; Alena Zbankova; Miroslav Novak
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  The representative porcine model for human cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Yoriyasu Suzuki; Alan C Yeung; Fumiaki Ikeno
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.