OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to define the epicardial substrate and ablation outcome in patients with left ventricular nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and suspected epicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT). BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia in NICM often originates from the epicardium. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with NICM underwent detailed endocardial and epicardial bipolar voltage maps and VT ablation for suspected epicardial VT. Eight patients with normal hearts and idiopathic VT served to define normal epicardial electrograms. Low-voltage regions were also assessed for wide (>80 ms), split, or late electrograms. RESULTS: Normal epicardial bipolar voltage was identified as >1.0 mV on the basis of the reference population. Confluent low-voltage areas were present in 18 epicardial (82%) and 12 endocardial (54%) maps and were typically over basal lateral LV. In the 18 patients with epicardial VT on the basis of activation/pacemapping, the mean epicardial area was greater than the endocardial low-voltage area (55.3 +/- 33.5 cm(2) vs. 22.9 +/- 32.4 cm(2), p < 0.01). Epicardial low-voltage areas showed 49.7% wide (>80 ms), split, and/or late electrograms rarely seen in the reference patients (2.3%). During follow-up of 18 +/- 7 months, ablation resulted in VT elimination in 15 of 21 patients (71%) including 14 of 18 patients (78%) with epicardial VT. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NICM and VT of epicardial origin, the substrate is characterized by areas of basal LV epicardial > endocardial bipolar low voltage. The electrograms in these areas are not only small (<1.0 mV) but wide (>80 ms), split, and/or late, and help identify the substrate targeted for successful ablation. 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to define the epicardial substrate and ablation outcome in patients with left ventricular nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and suspected epicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT). BACKGROUND:Ventricular tachycardia in NICM often originates from the epicardium. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with NICM underwent detailed endocardial and epicardial bipolar voltage maps and VT ablation for suspected epicardial VT. Eight patients with normal hearts and idiopathic VT served to define normal epicardial electrograms. Low-voltage regions were also assessed for wide (>80 ms), split, or late electrograms. RESULTS: Normal epicardial bipolar voltage was identified as >1.0 mV on the basis of the reference population. Confluent low-voltage areas were present in 18 epicardial (82%) and 12 endocardial (54%) maps and were typically over basal lateral LV. In the 18 patients with epicardial VT on the basis of activation/pacemapping, the mean epicardial area was greater than the endocardial low-voltage area (55.3 +/- 33.5 cm(2) vs. 22.9 +/- 32.4 cm(2), p < 0.01). Epicardial low-voltage areas showed 49.7% wide (>80 ms), split, and/or late electrograms rarely seen in the reference patients (2.3%). During follow-up of 18 +/- 7 months, ablation resulted in VT elimination in 15 of 21 patients (71%) including 14 of 18 patients (78%) with epicardial VT. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NICM and VT of epicardial origin, the substrate is characterized by areas of basal LV epicardial > endocardial bipolar low voltage. The electrograms in these areas are not only small (<1.0 mV) but wide (>80 ms), split, and/or late, and help identify the substrate targeted for successful ablation. 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Takeshi Sasaki; James Mudd; Charles Steenbergen; Menekhem M Zviman; Christopher F Miller; Saman Nazarian Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2011-09-02 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Rupa Bala; Jian-Fang Ren; Mathew D Hutchinson; Benoit Desjardins; Cory Tschabrunn; Edward P Gerstenfeld; Rajat Deo; Sanjay Dixit; Fermin C Garcia; Joshua Cooper; David Lin; Michael P Riley; Wendy S Tzou; Ralph Verdino; Andrew E Epstein; David J Callans; Francis E Marchlinski Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2011-08-31
Authors: Ammar M Killu; Niyada Naksuk; Faisal F Syed; Christopher V DeSimone; Prakriti Gaba; Chance Witt; Dorothy J Ladewig; Scott H Suddendorf; Joanne M Powers; Gaurav Satam; Zdeněk Stárek; Tomas Kara; Jiří Wolf; Pavel Leinveber; Michal Crha; Miroslav Novák; Charles J Bruce; Paul A Friedman; Samuel J Asirvatham Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2018-07-14 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Shiro Nakahara; Roderick Tung; Rafael J Ramirez; Yoav Michowitz; Marmar Vaseghi; Eric Buch; Jean Gima; Isaac Wiener; Aman Mahajan; Noel G Boyle; Kalyanam Shivkumar Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 24.094