| Literature DB >> 30006567 |
Marina Gabriela Monteiro Carvalho Mori da Cunha1,2, Giorgia Giacomazzi3, Geertje Callewaert1,2,4, Lucie Hympanova1,2,5, Francesca Russo1,2, Greetje Vande Velde6, Rik Gijsbers7, Maarten Albersen8, Maurilio Sampaolesi3, Jan Deprest9,10,11.
Abstract
Currently cell therapy is considered as an experimental strategy to assist the healing process following simulated vaginal birth injury in rats, boosting the functional and morphologic recovery of pelvic floor muscles and nerves. However, the optimal administration route and dose still need to be determined. Mesangioblasts theoretically have the advantage that they can differentiate in skeletal and smooth muscle. We investigated the fate of mesoangioblasts transduced with luciferase and green fluorescent protein reporter genes (rMABseGFP/fLUC) using bioluminescence, immunofluorescence and RT-PCR in rats undergoing simulated birth injury. rMABseGFP/fLUC were injected locally, intravenously and intra-arterially (common iliacs and aorta). Intra-arterial delivery resulted in the highest amount of rMABseGFP/fLUC in the pelvic organs region and in a more homogeneous distribution over all relevant pelvic organs. Sham controls showed that the presence of the injury is important for recruitment of intra-arterially injected rMABseGFP/fLUC. Injection through the aorta or bilaterally in the common iliac arteries resulted in comparable numbers of rMABseGFP/fLUC in the pelvic organs, yet aortic injection was faster and gave less complications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30006567 PMCID: PMC6045600 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28967-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Isolation, manipulation and characterization of rat mesoangioblasts (rMABs). (A) rMABs were isolated from 20 days old rat fetuses from skeletal muscle of both hind limbs. After expansion, cells were stained for alkaline phosphatase and further isolated by FACs sorting. In order to track the cells further in vivo, rMABs were labelled with CHMWS-eGFP-T2A-fLuc viral vector and sorted by FACs for GFP expression. The engineered cell line of rMABs GPF+ Luc+ were further validated in vitro by BLI and immunofluorescence. (B) rMABs were differentiated towards skeletal and smooth muscle lineages (left to right). In co-cultures with C2C12 GFP+ rMABs formed few chimeric myotubes (arrow). After smooth muscle differentiation, rMABs expressed both calponin and alpha smooth muscle actin.
Figure 2Longitudinal fate of the rMABseGFP/fLUC after local, intravenous and intra-arterial (A) Local administration and IA-Ao group showed the highest amount of rMABseGFP/fLUC in the pelvic organs region 1 h after administration. IA-Ao cohorts showed a significantly higher amount of rMABseGFP/fLUC at 1 and 3 days compared to local and IV groups. (B) Both IA injection groups showed a significant raise of the amount of rMABseGFP/fLUC at 1d. Local, IA-CIa and IA-Ao groups showed an abrupt drop of rMABseGFP/fLUC at 3 days. IV- intravenous; IA-CIa- intra-arterial (common iliacs); IA-Ao (intra-arterial (aorta). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001; ***p < 0.0001.
Figure 3Biodistribution of mesoangioblast (rMABseGFP/fLUC) in the pelvic organs of rats after 3 days of the simulated birth injury. (A) Ex vivo Bioluminescence analysis of the vagina, urethra, bladder (V/U/B), rectum (R) and levator ani (LA). IA-CIa and IA-Ao showed a more homogeneous distribution of rMABseGFP/fLUC (B) qPCR analysis for GFP expression levels in targeted organs. Data are shown as relative expression, normalized with local injections Mean ± SEM. N = 4, p < 0.05, 2-Way ANOVA, scale bar 100 µm).
Figure 4Representative images of rMABseGFP/fLUC administered intra-arterially in simulated birth injury model rats (200x). Green fluorescent protein (GFP) cells could be detected by immunofluorescence in the vagina, bladder, urethra, rectum and levator ani 2 days after injection. Scale bars 50 µm.
Figure 5Influence of the injury on the fate of the rMABs A-Presence of rMABseGFP/fLUC in the pelvic floor are in the non-injured (sham) and simulated birth injury (PNC + VD) model in rats when rMABseGFP/fLUC were injected locally (A), intravenously (B) and intra-arterially (C). The injury did not affect the fate of the rMABseGFP/fLUC in the local or IV groups, but in the intra-arterial group. PNC: pudendal nerve crush; VD: vaginal distension. **p < 0.001; ***p < 0.0001.
List of antibodies used.
| Protein | Concentration | Catalog number | Brand | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD44 | 1/500 | ab157107 | Abcam | Cambridge, UK |
| CD140b | 1/100 | ab32570 | Abcam | Cambridge, UK |
| CD146 | 1/300 | ab75769 | Abcam | Cambridge, UK |
| CD31 | 1/300 | 11-0311-85 | Thermo Fisher | Gent, Belgium |
| CD45 | 1/100 | 11-0451-82 | Thermo Fisher | Gent, Belgium |
| AlexaFluor 488 goat anti-mouse | 1/500 | A-11001 | Life Technologies | Merelbeke, Belgium |
| AlexaFluor 647 goat anti-rabbit | 1/500 | A-11012 | Life Technologies | Merelbeke, Belgium |
| alpha-Smooth Muscle ActinCy3 | 1/200 | C6198 | Sigma-Aldrich | Diegem, Belgium |
| Calponin | 1/200 | Ab46794 | Abcam | Cambridge, UK |
| GFP | 1/400 | Ab5450 | Abcam | Cambridge, UK |
| Laminin | 1/500 | Ab11575 | Abcam | Cambridge, UK |
| Alkaline Phosphatase | 1/25 | FAB1448P | R&D Systems (Biotechne) | USA |
Figure 6Routes of injection of rat mesoangioblasts (rMABS) for targeting the pelvicorgans in a simulated vaginal birth injury model in rat. (A) Local– injections were done laterally to the vagina. (B) Intravenous injection was performed in the tail vein. (C) Common Iliacs arteries- rMABseGFP/fLUC were injected in both common iliac arteries in two steps. The external iliacs were clamped and antegrade injection was done at a 45° angle along the vessel orientation. The procedure was performed bilaterally. (D) Aorta – rMABseGFP/fLUC were injected directly into the aorta 1.5 cm above the bifurcation. Before injection, both external iliac arteries were occluded with a vascular clamp.
List of primers used.
| Genes | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
| PGK | ATGCAAAGACTGGCCAAGCTAC | AGCCACAGCCTCAGCATATTTC |
| GAPDH | CAACTCCCTCAAGATTGTCAGCAA | GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGA |
| eGFP | CATGGTCCTGCTGGAGTTCGTG | CGTCGCCGTCCAGCTCGACCAG |