Abhiram Kondajji1,2, Michael Klingler3, Chao Tu4, Rebecca Kelley5, Kevin El-Hayek6, John Rodriquez7, Michael Cline3, Alisan Fathalizadeh3, Matthew Allemang3. 1. Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. kondaja@ccf.org. 2. General Surgery Resident, Cleveland Clinic-South Pointe Hospital, 20000 Harvard Road, Warrensville Height, OH, 44122, USA. kondaja@ccf.org. 3. Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 4. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 5. Dermatology and Plastic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, Metro Health, Cleveland, OH, USA. 7. Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP or G-POEM) provides significant short-term improvements in symptoms and objective emptying for patients with medically refractory gastroparesis, but it is unclear if patients with gastroparesis and co-existing dysmotility (small bowel or colonic delay) also benefit. In this study, we used wireless motility capsule (WMC) data to measure outcomes in patients with isolated gastroparesis (GP) and gastroparesis with co-existing dysmotility (GP + Dys) who underwent POP. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who had POP and completed WMC data during their evaluation of intestinal dysmotility. WMC data were reviewed to identify patients who demonstrated isolated GP or GP + Dys. Each patient's pre-op and post-op Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) and 4-h solid-phase scintigraphy gastric emptying studies (GES) scores were compared to evaluate improvement. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort (n = 73), 89% were female with a mean age of 47.0 ± 15.0 years old. Gastroparesis etiologies were divided among idiopathic (54.8%), diabetic (26%), postsurgical (8.2%), autoimmune (5.5%), and multifactorial (5.5%). Forty-one patients (56%) had GP and 32 patients (44%) had GP + Dys. GCSI improved after POP whether the patient had isolated GP (- 12.31, p < 0.001) or GP + Dys (- 9.58, p < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference in total GCSI improvement between the two groups. A subset of patients had postoperative GES available (n = 47). In the isolated GP and GP + Dys cohorts, 15/28 (54%) and 12/19 (63%) patients had normal post-op 4-h GES, respectively, but no statistical difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with medically refractory gastroparesis with and without concomitant gastrointestinal dysmotility show short-term subjective and objective improvement after POP. Concomitant small bowel or colonic dysmotility should not deter physicians from offering POP in carefully selected patients with gastroparesis.
INTRODUCTION: Per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP or G-POEM) provides significant short-term improvements in symptoms and objective emptying for patients with medically refractory gastroparesis, but it is unclear if patients with gastroparesis and co-existing dysmotility (small bowel or colonic delay) also benefit. In this study, we used wireless motility capsule (WMC) data to measure outcomes in patients with isolated gastroparesis (GP) and gastroparesis with co-existing dysmotility (GP + Dys) who underwent POP. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who had POP and completed WMC data during their evaluation of intestinal dysmotility. WMC data were reviewed to identify patients who demonstrated isolated GP or GP + Dys. Each patient's pre-op and post-op Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) and 4-h solid-phase scintigraphy gastric emptying studies (GES) scores were compared to evaluate improvement. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort (n = 73), 89% were female with a mean age of 47.0 ± 15.0 years old. Gastroparesis etiologies were divided among idiopathic (54.8%), diabetic (26%), postsurgical (8.2%), autoimmune (5.5%), and multifactorial (5.5%). Forty-one patients (56%) had GP and 32 patients (44%) had GP + Dys. GCSI improved after POP whether the patient had isolated GP (- 12.31, p < 0.001) or GP + Dys (- 9.58, p < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference in total GCSI improvement between the two groups. A subset of patients had postoperative GES available (n = 47). In the isolated GP and GP + Dys cohorts, 15/28 (54%) and 12/19 (63%) patients had normal post-op 4-h GES, respectively, but no statistical difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with medically refractory gastroparesis with and without concomitant gastrointestinal dysmotility show short-term subjective and objective improvement after POP. Concomitant small bowel or colonic dysmotility should not deter physicians from offering POP in carefully selected patients with gastroparesis.
Authors: Christine de la Loge; Elyse Trudeau; Patrick Marquis; Peter Kahrilas; Vincenzo Stanghellini; Nicholas J Talley; Jan Tack; Dennis A Revicki; Anne M Rentz; Dominique Dubois Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Allen A Lee; Satish Rao; Linda A Nguyen; Baharak Moshiree; Irene Sarosiek; Michael I Schulman; John M Wo; Henry P Parkman; Gregory E Wilding; Richard W McCallum; William L Hasler; Braden Kuo Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Michael Camilleri; Henry P Parkman; Mehnaz A Shafi; Thomas L Abell; Lauren Gerson Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: D A Revicki; A M Rentz; D Dubois; P Kahrilas; V Stanghellini; N J Talley; J Tack Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2003-07-01 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: D A Revicki; M Camilleri; B Kuo; N J Norton; L Murray; A Palsgrove; H P Parkman Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: H O Diaz Tartera; D-L Webb; A Kh Al-Saffar; M A Halim; G Lindberg; P Sangfelt; P M Hellström Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 3.598