INTRODUCTION: Care for US cancer survivors is often fragmented, contributing to poor health outcomes. Care and outcomes may improve when survivors and follow-up care providers receive survivorship care plans (SCPs), written documents containing information regarding cancer diagnosis, treatment, surveillance plans, and health promotion. However, implementing SCPs is challenging. As such, we sought to identify strategies for successfully implementing SCPs. METHODS: We measured SCP implementation using performance data from cancer programs participating in the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Oncology Practice Initiative, an oncologist-led quality assessment and improvement program. We used semistructured interviews with cancer program employees (eg, physicians) to identify strategies for successfully implementing SCPs by comparing approaches in cancer programs that, according to Quality Oncology Practice Initiative performance indicators, developed and delivered SCPs to a relatively small proportion of eligible survivors and their follow-up care providers (ie, low performers; n = 6 participants in five programs) with approaches among programs with better performance (ie, moderate performers; n = 15 participants in nine programs). RESULTS: Ten of 14 cancer programs developed SCPs for ≥ 50% of eligible survivors; two of 14 delivered SCPs to any survivors; and eight of 14 delivered SCPs to ≥ 25% of follow-up care providers. We found that moderate performers proactively addressed SCP requirements, leveraged requirements to improve survivorship care, set internal targets, automated implementation, had active leaders and champions, and tasked appropriate employees with SCP implementation. CONCLUSION: SCP implementation remains challenging. We identified strategies for successfully implementing SCPs. Future research should examine how cancer programs have achieved these strategies; findings could contribute to an understanding of the changes needed to implement comprehensive survivorship care.
INTRODUCTION: Care for US cancer survivors is often fragmented, contributing to poor health outcomes. Care and outcomes may improve when survivors and follow-up care providers receive survivorship care plans (SCPs), written documents containing information regarding cancer diagnosis, treatment, surveillance plans, and health promotion. However, implementing SCPs is challenging. As such, we sought to identify strategies for successfully implementing SCPs. METHODS: We measured SCP implementation using performance data from cancer programs participating in the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Oncology Practice Initiative, an oncologist-led quality assessment and improvement program. We used semistructured interviews with cancer program employees (eg, physicians) to identify strategies for successfully implementing SCPs by comparing approaches in cancer programs that, according to Quality Oncology Practice Initiative performance indicators, developed and delivered SCPs to a relatively small proportion of eligible survivors and their follow-up care providers (ie, low performers; n = 6 participants in five programs) with approaches among programs with better performance (ie, moderate performers; n = 15 participants in nine programs). RESULTS: Ten of 14 cancer programs developed SCPs for ≥ 50% of eligible survivors; two of 14 delivered SCPs to any survivors; and eight of 14 delivered SCPs to ≥ 25% of follow-up care providers. We found that moderate performers proactively addressed SCP requirements, leveraged requirements to improve survivorship care, set internal targets, automated implementation, had active leaders and champions, and tasked appropriate employees with SCP implementation. CONCLUSION:SCP implementation remains challenging. We identified strategies for successfully implementing SCPs. Future research should examine how cancer programs have achieved these strategies; findings could contribute to an understanding of the changes needed to implement comprehensive survivorship care.
Authors: Nicole P M Ezendam; Kim A H Nicolaije; Roy F P M Kruitwagen; Johanna M A Pijnenborg; M Caroline Vos; Dorry Boll; Marjo van Bommel; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Dawn L Hershman; Heather Greenlee; Danielle Awad; Kevin Kalinsky; Matthew Maurer; Grace Kranwinkel; Lois Brafman; Ramona Jayasena; Wei-Yann Tsai; Alfred I Neugut; Katherine D Crew Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-03-31 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kathryn J Ruddy; Hao Guo; Emily L Baker; Matthew J Goldstein; Erin E Mullaney; Lawrence N Shulman; Ann H Partridge Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kimberly D Miller; Rebecca L Siegel; Chun Chieh Lin; Angela B Mariotto; Joan L Kramer; Julia H Rowland; Kevin D Stein; Rick Alteri; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Susan A Sabatino; Trevor D Thompson; Judith Lee Smith; Julia H Rowland; Laura P Forsythe; Loria Pollack; Nikki A Hawkins Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Annelies H Boekhout; Elizabeth Maunsell; Gregory R Pond; Jim A Julian; Doug Coyle; Mark N Levine; Eva Grunfeld Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Colleen M Morken; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Amanda K Swiecichowski; James E Haine; Zachary T Williams; Kirsten Norslien; Natalia Arroyo; Xiao Zhang; Bethaney Campbell; Eneida A Mendonca; Mark B Juckett; Mary E Sesto Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Marquita W Lewis-Thames; Leslie R Carnahan; Aimee S James; Karriem S Watson; Yamilé Molina Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2020-01-11 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Kristine K Browning; Alai Tan; Rupa Ghosh-Berkebile; Denise Schimming; Rachee Hatfield; Patrick DiMeo; Maryam B Lustberg; Dori L Klemanski Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-08-31 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Bradley D McDowell; Jennifer Klemp; Anne Blaes; Andrea A Cohee; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Sailaja Kamaraju; Julie L Otte; Sarah L Mott; Elizabeth A Chrischilles Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Taylor P Stewart; Mary E Sesto; James E Haine; Mary F Henningfield; Kirsten Norslien; Xiao Zhang; David L Hahn; Amye J Tevaarwerk Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Soohyun Hwang; Burcu Bozkurt; Tamara Huson; Sarah Asad; Lauren Richardson; Joseph Amarachi Ogbansiegbe; Laura Viera; Caroline Buse; Ted A James; Deborah K Mayer; Lawrence N Shulman; Sarah A Birken Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-10-04