Kristine K Browning1,2, Alai Tan3, Rupa Ghosh-Berkebile4, Denise Schimming4, Rachee Hatfield4, Patrick DiMeo4, Maryam B Lustberg4,5, Dori L Klemanski4. 1. Cancer Support Services, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center-The James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. Browning.99@osu.edu. 2. College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. Browning.99@osu.edu. 3. College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 4. Cancer Support Services, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center-The James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. 5. Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center-The James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A quality review process was implemented to determine compliance with the requirement from the Commission on Cancer to use the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) template as the minimum data set for Treatment Summary and Survivorship Care Plans (TS/SCP) provided to cancer survivors. METHODS: TS/SCPs generated during 2017 (N = 1257) were audited for concordance with each of the 66 TS/SCP line items on ASCO's template. Descriptive statistics and chi-square statistics were used to examine line item concordance, overall and by services groups (survivorship vs. other oncology service). Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to estimate the effects of service delivery group on the concordance. RESULTS: Institutional compliance with the ASCO template was very high; 76% of the 66 line items were present in at least 75% of the delivered TS/SCPs. There was a significantly higher rate of concordance for TS/SCPs provided by the survivorship service (83% vs. 66%, P = 0.006). TS/SCPs provided by the survivorship service were nearly twice as likely to be concordant with ASCO template (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.77-2.00) compared to those by other service groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the electronic medical record to auto-populate information was instrumental in achieving a high rate of concordance. Institutions should consider providing training to improve or maintain quality of these documents. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Ensuring that the information contained on the TS/SCP is consistently present is necessary for a high-quality survivorship visit between the clinician, PCP, and survivor and as a record of care for future health care encounters.
PURPOSE: A quality review process was implemented to determine compliance with the requirement from the Commission on Cancer to use the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) template as the minimum data set for Treatment Summary and Survivorship Care Plans (TS/SCP) provided to cancer survivors. METHODS: TS/SCPs generated during 2017 (N = 1257) were audited for concordance with each of the 66 TS/SCP line items on ASCO's template. Descriptive statistics and chi-square statistics were used to examine line item concordance, overall and by services groups (survivorship vs. other oncology service). Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to estimate the effects of service delivery group on the concordance. RESULTS: Institutional compliance with the ASCO template was very high; 76% of the 66 line items were present in at least 75% of the delivered TS/SCPs. There was a significantly higher rate of concordance for TS/SCPs provided by the survivorship service (83% vs. 66%, P = 0.006). TS/SCPs provided by the survivorship service were nearly twice as likely to be concordant with ASCO template (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.77-2.00) compared to those by other service groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the electronic medical record to auto-populate information was instrumental in achieving a high rate of concordance. Institutions should consider providing training to improve or maintain quality of these documents. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Ensuring that the information contained on the TS/SCP is consistently present is necessary for a high-quality survivorship visit between the clinician, PCP, and survivor and as a record of care for future health care encounters.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer survivorship; Clinical audit; Electronic health records; Survivorship care plans; TS/SCP; Treatment summaries
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Laura P Forsythe; Carla Parry; Catherine M Alfano; Erin E Kent; Corinne R Leach; David A Haggstrom; Patricia A Ganz; Noreen Aziz; Julia H Rowland Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Sarah A Birken; Sarah Raskin; Yuqing Zhang; Gema Lane; Alexandra Zizzi; Mandi Pratt-Chapman Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Christine E Hill-Kayser; Linda A Jacobs; Peter Gabriel; Steven C Palmer; Margaret K Hampshire; Carolyn Vachani; Stephen B Edge; James M Metz Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Carrie Tompkins Stricker; Linda A Jacobs; Betsy Risendal; Alison Jones; Sarahlena Panzer; Patricia A Ganz; Karen L Syrjala; Mary S McCabe; K Scott Baker; Kenneth Miller; Jacqueline Casillas; Donald L Rosenstein; Marci Campbell; Steven C Palmer Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2011-10-04 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Paul B Jacobsen; Antonio P DeRosa; Tara O Henderson; Deborah K Mayer; Chaya S Moskowitz; Electra D Paskett; Julia H Rowland Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Dorothy Dulko; Claire M Pace; Kim L Dittus; Brian L Sprague; Lori A Pollack; Nikki A Hawkins; Berta M Geller Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.172