Marquita W Lewis-Thames1,2, Leslie R Carnahan3,4, Aimee S James2, Karriem S Watson4,5, Yamilé Molina3,4,5. 1. Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. 2. Department of Medical Social Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Center for Community Health, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Center for Research on Women and Gender, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 4. Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois. 5. University of Illinois Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
PURPOSE: As disparities in rural-urban cancer survivorship rates continue to widen, optimizing patient-provider communication regarding timely follow-up care is a potential mechanism to improving survivorship-related outcomes. The current study examines sociodemographic and health predictors of posttreatment patient-provider communication and follow-up care and associations between written communication and timely follow-up care for cancer survivors who identify as rural. METHODS: Data were analyzed from posttreatment cancer survivor respondents of the Illinois Rural Cancer Assessment Study. The current study tested associations between sociodemographic variables and health factors on the quality of patient-provider communication and timely posttreatment follow-up care, defined as visits ≤ 3 months posttreatment, and associations between the receipt of written patient-provider communication on timely posttreatment follow-up care. RESULTS: Among 90 self-identified rural cancer survivors, respondents with annual incomes < $50,000 and ≤ High School diploma were more likely to report a high quality of posttreatment patient-provider communication. Posttreatment written communication was reported by 62% of the respondents and 52% reported timely follow-up visits during the first 3 years of posttreatment care. Patients who reported receiving written patient-provider communication were more likely to have timely posttreatment follow-up care after completing active treatment than patients who had not received written patient-provider communication. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that written patient-provider communication improved timely follow-up care for self-identified rural cancer survivors. This research supports policy and practice that recommend the receipt of written survivorship care plans. Implementation of written survivorship care recommendations has the potential to improve survivorship care for rural cancer survivors.
PURPOSE: As disparities in rural-urban cancer survivorship rates continue to widen, optimizing patient-provider communication regarding timely follow-up care is a potential mechanism to improving survivorship-related outcomes. The current study examines sociodemographic and health predictors of posttreatment patient-provider communication and follow-up care and associations between written communication and timely follow-up care for cancer survivors who identify as rural. METHODS: Data were analyzed from posttreatment cancer survivor respondents of the Illinois Rural Cancer Assessment Study. The current study tested associations between sociodemographic variables and health factors on the quality of patient-provider communication and timely posttreatment follow-up care, defined as visits ≤ 3 months posttreatment, and associations between the receipt of written patient-provider communication on timely posttreatment follow-up care. RESULTS: Among 90 self-identified rural cancer survivors, respondents with annual incomes < $50,000 and ≤ High School diploma were more likely to report a high quality of posttreatment patient-provider communication. Posttreatment written communication was reported by 62% of the respondents and 52% reported timely follow-up visits during the first 3 years of posttreatment care. Patients who reported receiving written patient-provider communication were more likely to have timely posttreatment follow-up care after completing active treatment than patients who had not received written patient-provider communication. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that written patient-provider communication improved timely follow-up care for self-identified rural cancer survivors. This research supports policy and practice that recommend the receipt of written survivorship care plans. Implementation of written survivorship care recommendations has the potential to improve survivorship care for rural cancer survivors.
Authors: Laura P Forsythe; Carla Parry; Catherine M Alfano; Erin E Kent; Corinne R Leach; David A Haggstrom; Patricia A Ganz; Noreen Aziz; Julia H Rowland Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Sarah A Birken; Alecia S Clary; Shampa Bernstein; Jamiyla Bolton; Miriam Tardif-Douglin; Deborah K Mayer; Allison M Deal; Sara R Jacobs Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Dawn L Hershman; Xiaoyan Wang; Russell McBride; Judith S Jacobson; Victor R Grann; Alfred I Neugut Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2006-04-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: R K Portenoy; H T Thaler; A B Kornblith; J M Lepore; H Friedlander-Klar; E Kiyasu; K Sobel; N Coyle; N Kemeny; L Norton Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1994 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Paul C Nathan; Mark L Greenberg; Kirsten K Ness; Melissa M Hudson; Ann C Mertens; Martin C Mahoney; James G Gurney; Sarah S Donaldson; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-09-20 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: S Jane Henley; Robert N Anderson; Cheryll C Thomas; Greta M Massetti; Brandy Peaker; Lisa C Richardson Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2017-07-07
Authors: Victor Okunrintemi; Javier Valero-Elizondo; Benjamin Patrick; Joseph Salami; Martin Tibuakuu; Saba Ahmad; Oluseye Ogunmoroti; Shiwani Mahajan; Safi U Khan; Martha Gulati; Khurram Nasir; Erin D Michos Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Smita Bhatia; Wendy Landier; Electra D Paskett; Katherine B Peters; Janette K Merrill; Jonathan Phillips; Raymond U Osarogiagbon Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Shaila M Strayhorn; Marquita W Lewis-Thames; Leslie R Carnahan; Vida A Henderson; Karriem S Watson; Carol E Ferrans; Yamilé Molina Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 3.603