Literature DB >> 30003569

A pooling strategy to effectively use genotype data in quantitative traits genome-wide association studies.

Wei Zhang1, Aiyi Liu1, Paul S Albert2, Robert D Ashmead3, Enrique F Schisterman1, James L Mills1.   

Abstract

The goal of quantitative traits genome-wide association studies is to identify associations between a phenotypic variable, such as a vitamin level and genetic variants, often single-nucleotide polymorphisms. When funding limits the number of assays that can be performed to measure the level of the phenotypic variable, a subgroup of subjects is often randomly selected from the genotype database and the level of the phenotypic variable is then measured for each subject. Because only a proportion of the genotype data can be used, such a simple random sampling method may suffer from substantial loss of efficiency, especially when the number of assays is relative small and the frequency of the less common variant (minor allele frequency) is low. We propose a pooling strategy in which subjects in a randomly selected reference subgroup are aligned with randomly selected subjects from the remaining study subjects to form independent pools; blood samples from subjects in each pool are mixed; and the level of the phenotypic variable is measured for each pool. We demonstrate that the proposed pooling approach produces considerable gains in efficiency over the simple random sampling method for inference concerning the phenotype-genotype association, resulting in higher precision and power. The methods are illustrated using genotypic and phenotypic data from the Trinity Students Study, a quantitative genome-wide association study. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biallelic model; efficiency; estimation; group testing; homozygous minor allele; multiple comparison; phenotypes; pooling; power; random sampling; single nucleotide polymorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30003569      PMCID: PMC6204292          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  7 in total

1.  Using pooled exposure assessment to improve efficiency in case-control studies.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; D M Umbach
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  ROC curve analysis for biomarkers based on pooled assessments.

Authors:  David Faraggi; Benjamin Reiser; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The efficiency of pooling mRNA in microarray experiments.

Authors:  C M Kendziorski; Y Zhang; H Lan; A D Attie
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Using group testing to estimate a proportion, and to test the binomial model.

Authors:  C L Chen; W H Swallow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Multistage sampling for latent variable models.

Authors:  Duncan C Thomas
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Sunni L Mumford; Neil J Perkins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Genome-wide association study for feed efficiency in collective cage-raised rabbits under full and restricted feeding.

Authors:  J P Sánchez; A Legarra; M Velasco-Galilea; M Piles; A Sánchez; O Rafel; O González-Rodríguez; M Ballester
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.