Literature DB >> 15538173

Auditory M50 and M100 responses to broadband noise: functional implications.

Maria Chait1, Jonathan Z Simon, David Poeppel.   

Abstract

The functional significance of the M50 and M100 auditory evoked fields remains unclear. Here we report auditory evoked field data from three different studies employing wide-band noise stimuli. We find that, for the same stimuli, the strength of the M100, as well as its lateralization, are task-modulated. The M50, in contrast, shows three properties: It is dramatically more pronounced for noise stimuli than for pure tones, does not seem to be task dependent, and, is significantly stronger in the left hemisphere in all task conditions. These contrasting patterns of activation shed light on the properties of the response-generating mechanisms and suggest roles in the process of auditory figure-ground segregation.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15538173     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200411150-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  21 in total

1.  Sensitivity to temporal modulation rate and spectral bandwidth in the human auditory system: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Yadong Wang; Nai Ding; Nayef Ahmar; Juanjuan Xiang; David Poeppel; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Using PET H2O15 brain imaging to study the functional-anatomical correlates of non-human primate communication.

Authors:  Ricardo Gil-da-Costa; Allen Braun; Alex Martin
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Intracranial recording and source localization of auditory brain responses elicited at the 50 ms latency in three children aged from 3 to 16 years.

Authors:  Oleg Korzyukov; Eishi Asano; Valentina Gumenyuk; Csaba Juhász; Michael Wagner; Robert D Rothermel; Harry T Chugani
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Sound frequency affects the auditory motion-onset response in humans.

Authors:  Mikaella Sarrou; Pia Marlena Schmitz; Nicole Hamm; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  The encoding of auditory objects in auditory cortex: insights from magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  ERP correlates of auditory processing during automatic correction of unexpected perturbations in voice auditory feedback.

Authors:  Oleg Korzyukov; Laura Karvelis; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Evidence for opponent-channel coding of interaural time differences in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  David A Magezi; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  MEG in the macaque monkey and human: distinguishing cortical fields in space and time.

Authors:  Johanna M Zumer; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Leah A Krubitzer; Zhao Zhu; Robert S Turner; Elizabeth A Disbrow
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Dynamic Estimation of the Auditory Temporal Response Function From MEG in Competing-Speaker Environments.

Authors:  Sahar Akram; Jonathan Z Simon; Behtash Babadi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Robust cortical entrainment to the speech envelope relies on the spectro-temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Monita Chatterjee; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.