Kathryn Dent1, Namrata Grampurohit1, Christina Calhoun Thielen1, Cristina Sadowsky2, Loren Davidson3, Heather B Taylor4, Jackie Bultman5, John Gaughan1, Ralph J Marino1, M J Mulcahey1,6. 1. Department of Occupational Therapy, Jefferson College of Health Professions, Jefferson (Philadelphia University + Thomas Jefferson University), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Kennedy Krieger Rehabilitation Institute, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Shriners Hospitals for Children, Sacramento, California. 4. TIRR Herman Memorial, Houston, Texas. 5. Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, Michigan. 6. Shriners Hospitals for Children, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
Background: The Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) is a spinal cord injury (SCI)-specific instrument based on the CUE Questionnaire (CUE-Q). Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of CUE-T in children with cervical SCI and determine the lowest age appropriate for test administration. Method: In this repeated measures multicenter study, 39 youths, mean age 12.3 years and mean time post injury 5.14 years, completed two administrations of the CUE-T. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and known groups validity were measured. Concurrent and discriminant validity were measured against previously validated measures: CUE-Q, Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP), Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III, SCIM III-Self Care (SCIM-SC), and SCIM-Mobility. Results: The CUE-T scores demonstrated strong test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.95), strong internal consistency (α ≥ 0.90), and acceptable individual item agreement (κ ≥ 0.49). The hand subscale had better scores (p < .05) for the motor incomplete versus complete known groups, and the arm, hand, and side subscales had better scores (p < .05) for higher versus lower strength groups. The CUE-T had strong concurrent validity with the CUE-Q (r = 0.85-0.87), GRASSP (r = 0.78-0.90), and SCIM-SC (r = 0.70) and moderate-to-weak correlation with the total SCIM (r = 0.65) and SCIM-Mobility (r = 0.51). Children older than 6 years with mature grasp patterns were able to complete the CUE-T. Conclusion: The CUE-T scores are reliable and valid for use in children with cervical SCI older than 6 years of age.
Background: The Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) is a spinal cord injury (SCI)-specific instrument based on the CUE Questionnaire (CUE-Q). Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of CUE-T in children with cervical SCI and determine the lowest age appropriate for test administration. Method: In this repeated measures multicenter study, 39 youths, mean age 12.3 years and mean time post injury 5.14 years, completed two administrations of the CUE-T. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and known groups validity were measured. Concurrent and discriminant validity were measured against previously validated measures: CUE-Q, Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP), Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III, SCIM III-Self Care (SCIM-SC), and SCIM-Mobility. Results: The CUE-T scores demonstrated strong test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.95), strong internal consistency (α ≥ 0.90), and acceptable individual item agreement (κ ≥ 0.49). The hand subscale had better scores (p < .05) for the motor incomplete versus complete known groups, and the arm, hand, and side subscales had better scores (p < .05) for higher versus lower strength groups. The CUE-T had strong concurrent validity with the CUE-Q (r = 0.85-0.87), GRASSP (r = 0.78-0.90), and SCIM-SC (r = 0.70) and moderate-to-weak correlation with the total SCIM (r = 0.65) and SCIM-Mobility (r = 0.51). Children older than 6 years with mature grasp patterns were able to complete the CUE-T. Conclusion: The CUE-T scores are reliable and valid for use in children with cervical SCI older than 6 years of age.
Authors: Steven C Kirshblum; Stephen P Burns; Fin Biering-Sorensen; William Donovan; Daniel E Graves; Amitabh Jha; Mark Johansen; Linda Jones; Andrei Krassioukov; M J Mulcahey; Mary Schmidt-Read; William Waring Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Dorcas Beaton; Armin Curt; Susan Duff; Milos R Popovic; Claudia Rudhe; Michael G Fehlings; Mary C Verrier Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2011-08-12 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Mary Jane Mulcahey; John P Gaughan; Ross S Chafetz; Larry C Vogel; Amer F Samdani; Randal R Betz Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Ralph J Marino; Mary Patrick; Whitney Albright; Benjamin E Leiby; Mj Mulcahey; Mary Schmidt-Read; Stephen B Kern Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Laura Krisa; Devon M Middleton; Sona Saksena; Scott H Faro; Benjamin E Leiby; Feroze B Mohamed; M J Mulcahey Journal: Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil Date: 2022-04-12