Literature DB >> 21568688

The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension: reliability and validity.

Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan1, Dorcas Beaton, Armin Curt, Susan Duff, Milos R Popovic, Claudia Rudhe, Michael G Fehlings, Mary C Verrier.   

Abstract

With the advent of new interventions targeted at both acute and chronic spinal cord injury (SCI), it is critical that techniques and protocols are developed that reliably evaluate changes in upper limb impairment/function. The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) protocol, which includes five subtests, is a quantitative clinical upper limb impairment measure designed for use in acute and chronic cervical SCI. The objectives of this study were to: (1) establish the inter-rater and test-retest reliability, and (2) establish the construct and concurrent validity with the International Standards of Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI), Spinal Cord Independence Measure II (SCIM), and the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Questionnaire (CUE). The study protocol included repeated administration of the GRASSP to a cross-section of individuals with tetraplegia who were neurologically stable (n=72). ISNCSCI, CUE, and SCIM assessments were also administered. Two assessors examined the individuals over a 7-day period. Reliability was tested with intra-class correlation coefficients; construct validity was established with agreement/discordance analysis between the GRASSP and ISNCSCI sensory and motor items; and concurrent validity was tested with Spearman correlation coefficients. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability for all subtests within the GRASSP were above the hypothesized value of 0.80 (0.84-0.96 and 0.86-0.98, respectively). The GRASSP is about 50% more sensitive (construct validity) than the ISNCSCI when defining sensory and motor integrity of the upper limb; the subtests showed concurrence with the SCIM, SCIM self-care subscale, and CUE. The strongest concurrence to impairment was with self-perception of function (CUE) (0.57-0.83, p<0.0001). The GRASSP was found to demonstrate reliability, construct validity, and concurrent validity for use as a standardized upper limb impairment measure for individuals with tetraplegia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21568688     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  41 in total

1.  Evaluation of the graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and prehension (GRASSP) in children with tetraplegia.

Authors:  M J Mulcahey; Christina Calhoun Thielen; Kathryn Dent; Rebecca Sinko; Cristina Sadowsky; Rebecca Martin; Lawrence C Vogel; Loren Davidson; Heather Taylor; Jackie Bultman; John Gaughan
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Views of individuals with spinal cord injury on the use of wearable cameras to monitor upper limb function in the home and community.

Authors:  Jirapat Likitlersuang; Elizabeth R Sumitro; Pirashanth Theventhiran; Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; José Zariffa
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Comparison of Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) and the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP).

Authors:  Ralph J Marino; Rebecca Sinko; Anne Bryden; Deborah Backus; David Chen; Gregory A Nemunaitis; Benjamin E Leiby
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2018

4.  Subcortical control of precision grip after human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Karen L Bunday; Toshiki Tazoe; John C Rothwell; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Development of a database for translational spinal cord injury research.

Authors:  Jessica L Nielson; Cristian F Guandique; Aiwen W Liu; Darlene A Burke; A Todd Lash; Rod Moseanko; Stephanie Hawbecker; Sarah C Strand; Sharon Zdunowski; Karen-Amanda Irvine; John H Brock; Yvette S Nout-Lomas; John C Gensel; Kim D Anderson; Mark R Segal; Ephron S Rosenzweig; David S K Magnuson; Scott R Whittemore; Dana M McTigue; Phillip G Popovich; Alexander G Rabchevsky; Stephen W Scheff; Oswald Steward; Grégoire Courtine; V Reggie Edgerton; Mark H Tuszynski; Michael S Beattie; Jacqueline C Bresnahan; Adam R Ferguson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Predicting task performance from upper extremity impairment measures after cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  J Zariffa; A Curt; M C Verrier; M G Fehlings; S Kalsi-Ryan
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  The graded redefined assessment of strength sensibility and prehension version 2 (GV2): Psychometric properties.

Authors:  Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Colin Chan; Mary Verrier; Armin Curt; Michael Fehlings; Marc Bolliger; Inge-Marie Velstra
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Influence of different rehabilitation therapy models on patient outcomes: hand function therapy in individuals with incomplete SCI.

Authors:  Naaz M Kapadia; Shaghayegh Bagher; Milos R Popovic
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Validity of computer adaptive tests of daily routines for youth with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Leah M Bent; M J Mulcahey; Erin H Kelly; Christina L Calhoun; Feng Tian; Pensheng Ni; Lawrence C Vogel; Stephen M Haley
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2013

Review 10.  Reliability and Validity of the Sensory Component of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI): A Systematic Review.

Authors:  M Hales; E Biros; J E Reznik
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2015-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.