Literature DB >> 29992398

Linking pesticide marketing authorisations with environmental impact assessments through realistic landscape risk assessment paradigms.

Franz Streissl1, Mark Egsmose2, José V Tarazona2.   

Abstract

Each year, the European Food Safety Authority, supported by a network of experts in the EU Member States, assesses and publishes the environmental risks of 30-40 pesticides active substances. The assessments support hundreds of national risk evaluations for marketing (re-)authorisations of Plant Protection Products. These prospective regulatory evaluations are based on worst-case scenarios in order to provide the high level of protection required by the EU legislations, and establishes the conditions for a correct use of the products including risk mitigations options. However, recent publications suggest that the desired high level of protection may not be achieved with the current risk assessment paradigm. The consideration of larger spatial scales and multiple stressors, including different pesticide uses, could improve the risk assessment process. A next step is the use of these larger spatial scales for evidence-based assessments, evaluating the overall impact of pesticide use on the European environment and biodiversity. Reaching this level would provide science-based support to the National Plans on sustainable use of pesticides and to the broader EU policies defined in the EU Environmental Action Programmes. Recent technological developments, as well as policy efforts, have solved two of the key issues blocking this progress in the past. Data availability and technical capacity for handling Big Data are no longer an unaffordable obstacle. The current proposal presents an alternative environmental risk assessment paradigm, integrating use patterns and pesticides properties with landscape ecotypes and eco-regions, covering the variability of the European agro-environmental conditions. The paradigm is suggested to be implemented in a spatially explicit conceptual model, using the ecosystem services approach and vulnerable key driver species to represent the service providing units. This approach would allow mapping the likelihood and magnitude of the impact of pesticide use on ecosystems functions, environmental resources, and biodiversity at the EU scale.

Keywords:  EU scale; Ecosystem service; Environmental risk assessment; Landscape; Pesticides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29992398     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-018-1962-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  25 in total

1.  Screening risk assessment tools for assessing the environmental impact in an abandoned pyritic mine in Spain.

Authors:  Eduardo Moreno-Jiménez; Concepción García-Gómez; Ana Lourdes Oropesa; Elvira Esteban; Amparo Haro; Ramón Carpena-Ruiz; Jose Vicente Tarazona; Jesus Manuel Peñalosa; María Dolores Fernández
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Towards a landscape scale management of pesticides: ERA using changes in modelled occupancy and abundance to assess long-term population impacts of pesticides.

Authors:  Chris J Topping; Peter S Craig; Frank de Jong; Michael Klein; Ryszard Laskowski; Barbara Manachini; Silvia Pieper; Rob Smith; José Paulo Sousa; Franz Streissl; Klaus Swarowsky; Aaldrik Tiktak; Ton van der Linden
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  A route to more tractable expert advice.

Authors:  Willy Aspinall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Impaired ecosystem process despite little effects on populations: modeling combined effects of warming and toxicants.

Authors:  Nika Galic; Volker Grimm; Valery E Forbes
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Pesticide mixtures in the Swedish streams: Environmental risks, contributions of individual compounds and consequences of single-substance oriented risk mitigation.

Authors:  Mikael Gustavsson; Jenny Kreuger; Mirco Bundschuh; Thomas Backhaus
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  The role of ecological models in linking ecological risk assessment to ecosystem services in agroecosystems.

Authors:  Nika Galic; Amelie Schmolke; Valery Forbes; Hans Baveco; Paul J van den Brink
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Use of new scientific developments in regulatory risk assessments: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Jose V Tarazona
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 2.992

8.  Using ecological production functions to link ecological processes to ecosystem services.

Authors:  Randall Jf Bruins; Timothy J Canfield; Clifford Duke; Larry Kapustka; Amanda M Nahlik; Ralf B Schäfer
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.992

9.  Probabilistic ecological risk assessment of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene at a former industrial contaminated site.

Authors:  Marcello Zolezzi; Claudia Cattaneo; José V Tarazona
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations.

Authors:  Caspar A Hallmann; Ruud P B Foppen; Chris A M van Turnhout; Hans de Kroon; Eelke Jongejans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

1.  In Silico Methods for Environmental Risk Assessment: Principles, Tiered Approaches, Applications, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Astuto; Matteo R Di Nicola; José V Tarazona; A Rortais; Yann Devos; A K Djien Liem; George E N Kass; Maria Bastaki; Reinhilde Schoonjans; Angelo Maggiore; Sandrine Charles; Aude Ratier; Christelle Lopes; Ophelia Gestin; Tobin Robinson; Antony Williams; Nynke Kramer; Edoardo Carnesecchi; Jean-Lou C M Dorne
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  EFSA is working to advance the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops to better protect butterflies and moths.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Giacomo De Sanctis; Franco Maria Neri; Antoine Messéan
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-04-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.