Literature DB >> 27935184

Impaired ecosystem process despite little effects on populations: modeling combined effects of warming and toxicants.

Nika Galic1,2, Volker Grimm3,4, Valery E Forbes2.   

Abstract

Freshwater ecosystems are exposed to many stressors, including toxic chemicals and global warming, which can impair, separately or in combination, important processes in organisms and hence higher levels of organization. Investigating combined effects of warming and toxicants has been a topic of little research, but neglecting their combined effects may seriously misguide management efforts. To explore how toxic chemicals and warming, alone and in combination, propagate across levels of biological organization, including a key ecosystem process, we developed an individual-based model (IBM) of a freshwater amphipod detritivore, Gammarus pseudolimnaeus, feeding on leaf litter. In this IBM, life history emerges from the individuals' energy budgets. We quantified, in different warming scenarios (+1-+4 °C), the effects of hypothetical toxicants on suborganismal processes, including feeding, somatic and maturity maintenance, growth, and reproduction. Warming reduced mean adult body sizes and population abundance and biomass, but only in the warmest scenarios. Leaf litter processing, a key contributor to ecosystem functioning and service delivery in streams, was consistently enhanced by warming, through strengthened interaction between the detritivorous consumer and its resource. Toxicant effects on feeding and maintenance resulted in initially small adverse effects on consumers, but ultimately led to population extinction and loss of ecosystem process. Warming in combination with toxicants had little effect at the individual and population levels, but ecosystem process was impaired in the warmer scenarios. Our results suggest that exposure to the same amount of toxicants can disproportionately compromise ecosystem processing depending on global warming scenarios; for example, reducing organismal feeding rates by 50% will reduce resource processing by 50% in current temperature conditions, but by up to 200% with warming of 4 °C. Our study has implications for assessing and monitoring impacts of chemicals on ecosystems facing global warming. We advise complementing existing monitoring approaches with directly quantifying ecosystem processes and services.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamic energy budgets; ecosystem services; freshwater ecosystems; individual-based model; leaf litter processing; multiple stressors; population dynamics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27935184     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  6 in total

1.  Linking pesticide marketing authorisations with environmental impact assessments through realistic landscape risk assessment paradigms.

Authors:  Franz Streissl; Mark Egsmose; José V Tarazona
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Toward sustainable environmental quality: Priority research questions for Europe.

Authors:  Paul J Van den Brink; Alistair B A Boxall; Lorraine Maltby; Bryan W Brooks; Murray A Rudd; Thomas Backhaus; David Spurgeon; Violaine Verougstraete; Charmaine Ajao; Gerald T Ankley; Sabine E Apitz; Kathryn Arnold; Tomas Brodin; Miguel Cañedo-Argüelles; Jennifer Chapman; Jone Corrales; Marie-Agnès Coutellec; Teresa F Fernandes; Jerker Fick; Alex T Ford; Gemma Giménez Papiol; Ksenia J Groh; Thomas H Hutchinson; Hank Kruger; Jussi V K Kukkonen; Stefania Loutseti; Stuart Marshall; Derek Muir; Manuel E Ortiz-Santaliestra; Kai B Paul; Andreu Rico; Ismael Rodea-Palomares; Jörg Römbke; Tomas Rydberg; Helmut Segner; Mathijs Smit; Cornelis A M van Gestel; Marco Vighi; Inge Werner; Elke I Zimmer; Joke van Wensem
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Predicting population responses to environmental change from individual-level mechanisms: towards a standardized mechanistic approach.

Authors:  A S A Johnston; R J Boyd; J W Watson; A Paul; L C Evans; E L Gardner; V L Boult
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Modeling the emergence of migratory corridors and foraging hot spots of the green sea turtle.

Authors:  Mayeul Dalleau; Stephanie Kramer-Schadt; Yassine Gangat; Jérôme Bourjea; Gilles Lajoie; Volker Grimm
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 5.  Synergistic Effects of Climate Change and Marine Pollution: An Overlooked Interaction in Coastal and Estuarine Areas.

Authors:  Henrique Cabral; Vanessa Fonseca; Tânia Sousa; Miguel Costa Leal
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Functional measures as potential indicators of down-the-drain chemical stress in freshwater ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Laura J Harrison; Katie A Pearson; Christopher J Wheatley; Jane K Hill; Lorraine Maltby; Claudia Rivetti; Lucy Speirs; Piran C L White
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.084

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.