Literature DB >> 29989949

Visual Limit-Push Training Alters Movement Variability.

Eyad Hajissa, Amit Shah, James L Patton.   

Abstract

In both movement training and neurorehabilitation, there have been numerous examples of how average performance can be manipulated through practice using enhanced visual feedback.
OBJECTIVE: Rather than just influencing the mean, our objective was to use a novel feedback technique called limit-push to influence the trial-to-trial variability of motion by distorting vision.
METHOD: Limit-push was previously done using robotic forces; the present study employed only visual distortions that imitated the limit-push approach.
RESULTS: Like the robotic force treatment, our results showed how subjects significantly shifted the distributions of their motions. This effect was even greater than that of the original limit-push experiment that used robotic forces. SIGNIFICANCE: Such visual distortion interventions do not require a robot for enhanced training.
CONCLUSION: The visual limit-push technique appears to be able to selectively alter both the central tendency and variability in performance training applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29989949      PMCID: PMC8740954          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2786142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  19 in total

1.  Relative stability improves with experience in a dynamic standing task.

Authors:  J L Patton; W A Lee; Y C Pai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Optimal movement variability: a new theoretical perspective for neurologic physical therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Stergiou; Regina Harbourne; James Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Context-dependent reflex control: some insights into the role of balance.

Authors:  S Rietdyk; A E Patla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience.

Authors:  M A Conditt; F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool.

Authors:  H Imamizu; S Miyauchi; T Tamada; Y Sasaki; R Takino; B Pütz; T Yoshioka; M Kawato
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Hemiparetic stroke impairs anticipatory control of arm movement.

Authors:  Craig D Takahashi; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of physical guidance on short-term learning of walking on a narrow beam.

Authors:  Antoinette Domingo; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Visuomotor learning enhanced by augmenting instantaneous trajectory error feedback during reaching.

Authors:  James L Patton; Yejun John Wei; Preeti Bajaj; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Using visual feedback distortion to alter coordinated pinching patterns for robotic rehabilitation.

Authors:  Yoky Matsuoka; Bambi R Brewer; Roberta L Klatzky
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of robot viscous forces on arm movements in chronic stroke survivors: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Yazan Abdel Majeed; Saria Awadalla; James L Patton
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.262

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.