Literature DB >> 9535575

Context-dependent reflex control: some insights into the role of balance.

S Rietdyk1, A E Patla.   

Abstract

Recent research suggests that the balance requirements of a task dictate the reflexive response. However, these observations were inferred indirectly from either different tasks or different phases of the same task. This study directly tested the hypothesis of balance-dependent control during recovery from an unexpected trip. The subjects were tripped in two different support conditions: unilimb support (provided by the stance limb) or trilimb support (provided by the stance limb and both arms placed on adjacent parallel bars). The subjects exhibited anticipatory changes: they biased the body center of mass toward the support limb in the mediolateral direction and elevated the swing limb higher when there was a possibility of being tripped. The electromyographic (EMG) latencies were not influenced by the threat to equilibrium. The magnitudes of the EMG reflexive response to the trip were clearly modulated as a function of the threat to stability, not in a simple manner, but rather in a complex manner, which optimized the recovery strategy. It is evident that the overriding concern, equilibrium control during locomotion, has a dominant influence on reflex modulation.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9535575     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  12 in total

1.  Two-stage muscle activity responses in decisions about leg movement adjustments during trip recovery.

Authors:  Zrinka Potocanac; Mirjam Pijnappels; Sabine Verschueren; Jaap van Dieën; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Phase-dependent reversal of the crossed conditioning effect on the soleus Hoffmann reflex from cutaneous afferents during walking in humans.

Authors:  Shinya Suzuki; Tsuyoshi Nakajima; Genki Futatsubashi; Rinaldo A Mezzarane; Hiroyuki Ohtsuka; Yukari Ohki; Tomoyoshi Komiyama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Phase-specific modulation of the soleus H-reflex as a function of threat to stability during walking.

Authors:  E M Krauss; J E Misiaszek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Withdrawal reflex responses evoked by repetitive painful stimulation delivered on the sole of the foot during late stance: site, phase, and frequency modulation.

Authors:  Erika G Spaich; Jonas Emborg; Thomas Collet; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Ole Kaeseler Andersen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The amplitude of interlimb cutaneous reflexes in the leg is influenced by fingertip touch and vision during treadmill locomotion.

Authors:  Juan Forero; John E Misiaszek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Online adjustments of leg movements in healthy young and old.

Authors:  Zrinka Potocanac; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Foot-sole reflex receptive fields for human withdrawal reflexes in symmetrical standing position.

Authors:  Ole K Andersen; Finn Sonnenborg; Zlatko Matjacić; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Visual Limit-Push Training Alters Movement Variability.

Authors:  Eyad Hajissa; Amit Shah; James L Patton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Stepping onto the unknown: reflexes of the foot and ankle while stepping with perturbed perceptions of terrain.

Authors:  R C Riddick; D J Farris; A G Cresswell; A D Kuo; L A Kelly
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Transfemoral amputee recovery strategies following trips to their sound and prosthesis sides throughout swing phase.

Authors:  Camila Shirota; Ann M Simon; Todd A Kuiken
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.