Literature DB >> 12610680

Hemiparetic stroke impairs anticipatory control of arm movement.

Craig D Takahashi1, David J Reinkensmeyer.   

Abstract

Internal models are sensory motor mappings used by the nervous system to anticipate the force requirements of movement tasks. The ability to use internal models likely underlies the development of skillful control of the arm throughout life. It is currently unknown to what extent individuals with hemiparetic stroke can form and implement such internal models. To examine this issue, we measured whether such individuals could learn to anticipate forces applied to their arms by a lightweight robotic device as they practiced reaching to a target. Thirteen subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis were tested. Forces were applied to the arm, which curved the hand path in either the medial or lateral direction, as the subjects reached repeatedly towards a target located in front of them at their workspace boundary. The subjects exhibited a decreased ability to adapt to the perturbing forces with their hemiparetic arms. That is, they did not straighten their reaching path as well, compared to their ipsilesional arms, and they exhibited smaller aftereffects when the perturbing force was unexpectedly removed. The ability to adapt to the force improved significantly with decreasing impairment severity, as quantified using both clinical scales and quantitative strength measurements. Some subjects with strength reductions as severe as 60% were able to adapt to the fields, generating significant aftereffects. We conclude that hemiparetic stroke impairs the ability to implement internal models used for anticipatory control of arm movement, although even some severely weakened subjects retain at least a partial ability to form and use internal models. Finding ways to fully restore this adaptive ability, or to make use of what adaptive ability remains during rehabilitation, is an important goal for improving functional motor recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12610680     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1340-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a randomly varying dynamical environment.

Authors:  C D Takahashi; R A Scheidt; D J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Robot-aided functional imaging: application to a motor learning study.

Authors:  H I Krebs; T Brashers-Krug; S L Rauch; C R Savage; N Hogan; R H Rubin; A J Fischman; N M Alpert
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning.

Authors:  S J Goodbody; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Force adaptation transfers to untrained workspace regions in children: evidence for developing inverse dynamic motor models.

Authors:  Petra Jansen-Osmann; Stefanie Richter; Jürgen Konczak; Karl-Theodor Kalveram
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  G Francisco; J Chae; H Chawla; S Kirshblum; R Zorowitz; G Lewis; S Pang
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination.

Authors:  C Ghez; R Sainburg
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.273

7.  Guidance-based quantification of arm impairment following brain injury: a pilot study.

Authors:  D J Reinkensmeyer; J P Dewald; W Z Rymer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  1999-03

8.  Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment.

Authors:  C Gowland; P Stratford; M Ward; J Moreland; W Torresin; S Van Hullenaar; J Sanford; S Barreca; B Vanspall; N Plews
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Abnormal muscle coactivation patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects.

Authors:  J P Dewald; P S Pope; J D Given; T S Buchanan; W Z Rymer
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Epidemiologic profile of long-term stroke disability: the Framingham study.

Authors:  G E Gresham; T F Phillips; P A Wolf; P M McNamara; W B Kannel; T R Dawber
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  41 in total

1.  The nature of hand motor impairment after stroke and its treatment.

Authors:  Preeti Raghavan
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-06

2.  Greater reliance on impedance control in the nondominant arm compared with the dominant arm when adapting to a novel dynamic environment.

Authors:  Christopher N Schabowsky; Joseph M Hidler; Peter S Lum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Functional restoration for the stroke survivor: informing the efforts of engineers.

Authors:  James Patton; Steven L Small; William Zev Rymer
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.119

4.  Minimally assistive robot training for proprioception enhancement.

Authors:  Maura Casadio; Pietro Morasso; Vittorio Sanguineti; Psiche Giannoni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Assessing the effectiveness of robot facilitated neurorehabilitation for relearning motor skills following a stroke.

Authors:  W S Harwin; A Murgia; E K Stokes
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Negative viscosity can enhance learning of inertial dynamics.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; James L Patton; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2009-06

Review 7.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Boudewijn J Kollen; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Spasticity may obscure motor learning ability after stroke.

Authors:  Sandeep K Subramanian; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Alterations in upper limb muscle synergy structure in chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Jinsook Roh; William Z Rymer; Eric J Perreault; Seng Bum Yoo; Randall F Beer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Impact of gravity loading on post-stroke reaching and its relationship to weakness.

Authors:  Randall F Beer; Michael D Ellis; Bradley G Holubar; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.