| Literature DB >> 29988653 |
Junxia Zhang1,2, Baochun Yang1,2, Xiaocheng Wen1,2, Guoqiang Sun2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bamei pigs are special germplasm resources in Qinghai. In the specific environment of the Qinghai plateau, local breeds, through long-term natural and artificial selection, have acquired a relatively stable population structure and genetic diversity. This study revealed Bamei pigs' genetic diversity at the molecular level and the degree of introgression of commercial breeds into Bamei pigs.Entities:
Keywords: Bamei pig; Commercial pig; Genetic variation; Mitochondrial DNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29988653 PMCID: PMC6029399 DOI: 10.1186/s11658-018-0097-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Mol Biol Lett ISSN: 1425-8153 Impact factor: 5.787
Characteristics of samples
| Breed/population | Category | Sample size | Source | Sampling site |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bamei pig | Indigenous | 115 | Ear tissue | Qinghai Province |
| Duroc | Commercial | 101 | Ear tissue | Qinghai Province |
| Landrace | Commercial | 108 | Ear tissue | Qinghai Province |
| Yorkshire | Commercial | 165 | Ear tissue | Qinghai Province |
| Total | 489 |
Parameters for determination of genetic diversity of pig populations
| Code | Breed/Population | Size | S | H | Hd ± SD | Pi | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHN-QH | Bamei | 115 | 10 | 10 | 0.491 ± 0.055 | 0.00264 | 1.15 |
| DUR | Duroc | 101 | 18 | 11 | 0.732 ± 0.033 | 0.00947 | 4.12 |
| LAN | Landrace | 108 | 18 | 18 | 0.853 ± 0.02 | 0.01567 | 6.815 |
| YOR | Yorkshire | 165 | 27 | 24 | 0.856 ± 0.018 | 0.01559 | 6.768 |
S: Number of polymorphic (segregating) sites
H: Number of haplotype
Pi: Nucleotide diversity, Nei 1987, eqs. 10.5 or 10.6 (Masatoshi Nei)
K: Average number of nucleotide differences; Tajima 1983, eq. A3 (Tajima)
Hd ± SD: Haplotype (gene) diversity and sampling variance, Nei 1987, eqs. 8.4 and 8.12 but replacing 2n with n. The standard deviation (or standard error) is the square root of the variance (Masatoshi Nei) [13]
Correlation matrix between indexes
| Item | Hd | Pi | K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hd | 1.000 | .990 | .990 |
| Pi | .990 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| K | .990 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Rank and general scores of principal components of different populations
| Code | Breed/population | FZ (F1) | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHN-QH | Bamei | −2.345 | 4 |
| DUR | Duroc | −0.132 | 3 |
| LAN | Landrace | 0.405 | 1 |
| YOR | Yorkshire | 0.001 | 2 |
The distribution of variable sites of mtDNA D-loop in pig populations
| H | Polymorphism sites | CHN-QH | DUR | LAN | YOR | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | CGAAT-CCGAAAA-TTTTGTTCTATAATCGTATCCAGCCTGATAGTCCTC | 6 | 6 | |||
| H2 | .....-.T..TG.CACC.A....G....T.......A..C..C..C.T.. | 3 | 15 | 18 | ||
| H3 | T....-.T.TTG.CACC.A.........T.......A..C..C..C.T.. | 4 | 4 | |||
| H4 | .....A.T..TG-CACC.A.........T.......A.....C..C.T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H5 | .....-.T..TG.CACCCA.T....T..A..C..C..C.T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H6 | .....-.T.. | 44 | 23 | 21 | 88 | |
| H7 | .....-TTA..G.CACC.A.........T....T..A..C..CT.C.T.. | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||
| H8 | .....-.T...G.CACC.A..T......T.......A..C..C..C.T.. | 2 | 2 | 4 | ||
| H9 | .....-.T...G.-A.C..C........T.......A..C..C..C.T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H10 | .....-.......-A....C................A..C..C....... | 2 | 2 | |||
| H11 | .....-.......-A....CC...............A..C..C..C.T.. | 1 | 3 | 4 | ||
| H12 | .....-.......-A....C........T..........C..C..C.T.. | 3 | 12 | 6 | 21 | |
| H13 | ....C-.......AA..................T.....C..C..C.T.. | 8 | 2 | 10 | ||
| H14 | ....C-.......A-.................CT............TT.. | 2 | 2 | |||
| H15 | .....-.......CA.C.............T.............T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H16 | .....-.......-A....C.............T..........A..T.. | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| H17 | .....-.......-A....C.........A.G...............T.. | 27 | 1 | 13 | 41 | |
| H18 | .....-.......-A....C.........A...T.............T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H19 | .....-.......-A....C.....................G.....T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H20 | .....-.......-A....C................A..........T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H21 | .....-.......-A....C................A............. | 2 | 2 | 4 | ||
| H22 | .....-.......-A....C........T....T...........C.T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H23 | .....-.......CA.C........T....T.............T.. | 7 | 3 | 10 | ||
| H24 | .....-.......-A....C........T....TT............T.. | 2 | 2 | |||
| H25 | .....-.......-A....C......G.T....T..A..........T.. | 1 | 8 | 9 | ||
| H26 | .....-.......-A....C........T....T.............T.T | 1 | 1 | |||
| H27 | .....-.......-A....C........T...........A......T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H28 | .....-.......-A....C........T.G..T......A......T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H29 | .AG..-.T..TG.CACC.A.........T.......A..C..C..C.T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H30 | .....-.T..TG.CACC.A.........T.......AT.C..C..C.T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H31 | .....-.T..TG.CACC.A.....C...T.......A..C..C..C.T.. | 10 | 6 | 29 | 51 | 96 |
| H32 | .....-.T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H33 | .....-.T..TG.CACC.A.........T..........C..C..C.T.. | 6 | 6 | |||
| H34 | .....-.T...G.CACC.A.....CG..T.......A..C.....C.T.. | 81 | 4 | 12 | 97 | |
| H35 | ...G.-.T..TG.CACC.A.........T.......A..C..C..C.T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H36 | .....-.T..TG.CACC.A.........T.......A..C..C..C.... | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| H37 | .....-.T..TG.CACC.A........CT.......A..C..C..C.T.. | 8 | 8 | |||
| H38 | .....A.T..TG.CACC.A.........T.......A..C..C..C.T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H39 | .....-.T.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H40 | ....C-.......AA.................CT............TT.. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H41 | .....-.......-A....C........T.........T........T.. | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 21 |
| 42 | .....-.......CA....C.............................. | 1 | 1 | |||
| H43 | .....-.......-A................................... | 1 | 2 | 3 |
H1–43: Different haplotypy
CHN-QH: Bamei pig population
DUR: Duroc pig population
LAN: Landrace pig population
YOR: Yorkshire pig population
Analysis of native pig haplotypes shared with commercial pigs
| Code | Breed | Sc | S | Sc/S |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHN-QH | Bamei | 96 | 115 | 83.48% |