| Literature DB >> 31480190 |
Qianyun Ge1, Caixia Gao2, Yuan Cai1, Ting Jiao3, Jinqiang Quan1, Yongbo Guo4, Wangshan Zheng4, Shengguo Zhao1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evidence from previous reports indicates that pig domestication in East Asia mainly occurred in the Mekong region and the middle and downstream regions of the Yangtze River. Further research identified two new origin centers for domestic pigs in the Tibetan Plateau and the islands of Southeast Asia. However, due to the small sample size of Tibetan pigs, details of the origin and spread of Tibetan pigs has not yet been established.Entities:
Keywords: Phylogeny; Polymorphism; Tibetan Pig; Upstream Region of the Yellow River; mtDNA D-Loop
Year: 2019 PMID: 31480190 PMCID: PMC7054604 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.19.0275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Parameters for determination of genetic diversity of Tibetan pigs
| Population | Size | S | h | Hd | Pi | K | Fu’s F | Tajima’s D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aba pig | 70 | 6 | 8 | 0.839±0.018 | 0.00363 | 1.563 | −0.827 | 0.60968 |
| Ganzi pig | 133 | 15 | 14 | 0.596±0.044 | 0.00336 | 1.449 | −5.274 | −1.26021 |
| Diqing pig | 178 | 12 | 16 | 0.717±0.032 | 0.00338 | 1.458 | −6.611 | −0.74094 |
| Linzhi pig | 241 | 12 | 14 | 0.538±0.036 | 0.00200 | 0.860 | −8.147 | −1.34760 |
| Shannan pig | 91 | 13 | 14 | 0.816±0.029 | 0.00354 | 1.525 | −5.893 | −1.10357 |
| Changdu pig | 90 | 16 | 17 | 0.883±0.014 | 0.00435 | 1.876 | −7.670 | −1.15051 |
| Rkaze pig | 24 | 2 | 3 | 0.420±0.110 | 0.00128 | 0.551 | 0.102 | 0.06219 |
| Hezuo pig | 268 | 20 | 27 | 0.845±0.015 | 0.00409 | 1.763 | −16.692 | −1.18627 |
| Qinghai pig | 106 | 11 | 10 | 0.725±0.036 | 0.00317 | 1.380 | −2.313 | −0.88850 |
| Total | 1,201 | 42 | 60 | 0.812±0.008 | 0.00368 | 1.584 | −66.116 | −1.82904 |
S, number of polymorphic (segregating) sites; Hd, number of haplotypes; Pi, nucleotide diversity, Nei 1987, eqs. 10.5 or 10.6 (Masatoshi Nei); K, average number of nucleotide differences, Tajima 1983, eq. A3 (Tajima).
Hd±SD, haplotype (gene) diversity and sampling variance, Nei 1987, eqs. 8.4 and 8.12 but replacing 2n with n. The standard deviation (or standard error) is the square root of the variance (Masatoshi Nei) [8].
Correlation matrix between indexes
| Item | Hd | Pi | K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hd | 1.000 | 0.931 | 0.931 |
| Pi | 0.931 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| k | 0.931 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Hd, number of haplotypes; Pi, nucleotide diversity; K, average number of nucleotide differences.
Rank and general scores of principal components of different populations
| Province | Fz | Rank | Population | Fz | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichuan | 0.381 | 2 | Aba pig | 0.974 | 3 |
| Ganzi pig | −0.212 | 7 | |||
| Yunnan | 0.244 | 3 | Diqing pig | 0.244 | 5 |
| Tibet | −0.648 | 5 | Linzhi pig | −2.046 | 8 |
| Shannan pig | 0.785 | 4 | |||
| Changdu pig | 1.993 | 1 | |||
| Rkaze pig | −3.324 | 9 | |||
| Gansu | 1.546 | 1 | Hezuo pig | 1.546 | 2 |
| Qinghai | 0.039 | 4 | Qinghai pig | 0.039 | 6 |
Fz, synthesized assessment score.
Figure 1The median network of Tibetan pig and other pig mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) based on the sequence variation in the control region. The mtDNA control region fragment covers the region from 15,372 to 15,414 relative to the AF486859 reference sequence. These samples are from the nine populations of Tibetan pigs in five provinces, including Linzhi, Shannan, Changdu, and Rkaze pigs from the Tibetan Plateau area; Aba and Ganzi pigs from Sichuan Province; Hezuo pigs from Gansu Province; Diqing pigs from Yunnan Province; Qinghai pigs from Qinghai Province; and other pig breeds. Each haplotype is represented by a circle, with the area of the circle proportional to its frequency. Samples from different regions are indicated by different colors. The length of each branch is proportional to the number of mutations on the respective branch. In parentheses are the haplotypes we named, which are the same as the reference haplotype in Larson’s article.
Figure 2The phylogenetic tree of Tibetan pigs and other pig breeds based on DNA control region (D-loop) sequences. The tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with the African warthog as the outgroup. The evolutionary history was inferred using the NJ method [21]. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 0.30134799 is shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1,000 replicates) are shown next to the branches [22]. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method [23] and are in units of the number of base substitutions per site. The rate variation among sites was modeled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1). The analysis involved 69 nucleotide sequences. The codon positions included were 1st+2nd+3rd+Noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 428 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7 [12].