| Literature DB >> 29988427 |
Albin Lobo1, Ole Kim Hansen1, Jon Kehlet Hansen1, Eva Ortvald Erichsen1, Birgitte Jacobsen1,2, Erik Dahl Kjær1.
Abstract
We assessed the level of geographic differentiation of Tilia cordata in Denmark based on tests of 91 trees selected from 12 isolated populations. We used quantitative analysis of spring phenology and population genetic analysis based on SSR markers to infer the likely historical genetic processes within and among populations. High genetic variation within and among populations was observed in spring phenology, which correlated with spring temperatures at the origin of the tested T. cordata trees. The population genetic analysis revealed significant differentiation among the populations, but with no clear sign of isolation by distance. We infer the findings as indications of ongoing fine scale selection in favor of local growth conditions made possible by limited gene flow among the small and fragmented populations. This hypothesis fits well with reports of limited fruiting in the investigated Danish T. cordata populations, while the species is known for its ability to propagate vegetatively by root suckers. Our results suggest that both divergent selection and genetic drift may have played important roles in forming the genetic patterns of T. cordata at its northern distribution limit. However, we also speculate that epigenetic mechanism arising from the original population environment could have created similar patterns in regulating the spring phenology.Entities:
Keywords: FST; QST; drift; gene flow; population genetics; selection
Year: 2018 PMID: 29988427 PMCID: PMC6024143 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Minimum May temperature and location of the 12 populations (red stars) included in the study (Map provided by Mikael Scharling, Danish Meteorological Institute) and with an outline of four eco‐geographic regions. Phenology was assessed in a clonal seed orchard with replications (black star)
Climatic data, location, elevation, and average bud burst score of the studied T. cordata populations
| Population | Latitude (º North) | Longitude (º East) | Altitude (m) | No. of clones |
| Bud burst April 19 2004 | Bud burst May 5 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bolderslev skov | 55.00 | 9.36 | 56.90 | 8 | 3 | 2.82 | 3.28 |
| Bøgebakke | 57.01 | 9.50 | 77.30 | 4 | 2 | 2.38 | 2.93 |
| Draved Skov | 55.02 | 8.97 | 20.00 | 9 | 4 | 2.75 | 3.24 |
| Ersted Skov | 56.80 | 9.78 | 32.80 | 10 | 2 | 1.76 | 2.66 |
| Holt Krat | 56.08 | 9.45 | 105.40 | 10 | 1 | 2.05 | 2.88 |
| Hønning | 55.18 | 8.94 | 36.10 | 5 | 4 | 2.32 | 3.04 |
| Kraruplund | 55.71 | 8.65 | 18.40 | 10 | 1 | 1.83 | 2.64 |
| Sevel Krat | 56.45 | 8.87 | 28.00 | 3 | 1 | 1.55 | 2.48 |
| Skovbjerg Krat | 55.93 | 8.68 | 19.00 | 5 | 1 | 1.34 | 2.14 |
| Skovsgårdslund | 57.10 | 9.49 | 14.10 | 6 | 2 | 2.61 | 3.03 |
| Åbybjerget | 57.19 | 9.76 | 11.30 | 11 | 2 | 2.44 | 2.99 |
| Årslev Skov | 55.02 | 9.37 | 76.00 | 10 | 3 | 2.93 | 3.16 |
Population differentiation and genetic parameters for spring phenology (H 2 = Broad sense heritability across populations, V G = genetic variance across populations, V P = Phenotypic variance, CV G = genetic coefficient of variation, Pop Diff = maximum difference between populations, R 5 and R 10 = predicted response to a 5% and 10% selection for bud burst among clones within populations at selection intensities of 2.06 and 1.75, respectively)
| Parameters | Bud burst 19 April 2004 | Bud burst 5 May 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.26 | 2.91 |
|
| 0.22 | 0.12 |
|
| 0.41 | 0.27 |
|
| 0.21 | 0.12 |
|
| 0.53 | 0.44 |
|
| 0.05 | 0.06 |
|
| 0.33 | 0.25 |
|
| 0.12 | 0.11 |
|
| <.001 | <.001 |
| Pop Diff | 1.6 | 1.1 |
|
| 0.7 | 0.5 |
|
| 0.6 | 0.4 |
Figure 2Weighted regression between population means of bud burst score in May 2006 and minimum temperature in May at original population site
Figure 3Population differentiation (difference in LSMeans) in spring phenology (=bud burst) plotted against their pairwise geographic distances
Pairwise matrix of F ST values for the four eco‐geographic regions used in the study (F ST values below the diagonal; Probability p (rand ≥ data) based on 999 permutations is shown above diagonal)
| Ecoregion | Central | North | SouthEast | SouthWest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central | 0.000 |
|
|
|
| North | 0.014 | 0.000 |
|
|
| SouthEast | 0.014 | 0.020 | 0.000 |
|
| SouthWest | 0.027 | 0.037 | 0.030 | 0.000 |
Figure 4Genetic differentiation between clones (pairwise F st values) plotted against their pairwise geographic distances