AIMS: Real Time Recordings (RTR) of pulmonary vein (PV) activity provide important information in the setting of the 2nd generation Cryoballoon (CB-A), as a funcion of time to isolation. Visualization of RTR with the standard inner lumen mapping catheter (ILMC) 20mm Achieve (AC) is possible in roughly 50% of PVs. A novel 25mm-Achieve Advance (AC-A) has been developed with the aim of increasing the detection of RTR. The purpose of this study is to compare the AC-A with the AC, to feasibility and improvement of RTR. METHODS: We assigned 50 patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation to CB-A PVI, using the AC-A as ILMC. We compared this group with 50 patients, matched for age and left atrial volume, who previously underwent the CB-A PVI using the AC. RESULTS: RTR were more frequently observed with the AC-A than with the AC (74% vs 49%; p= 0.02). RTR in the left superior PVs was similar in both groups (74% vs 72%, p= 0.8). RTR with the AC-A were equally appreciated in left or right sided, superior or inferior PVs. No significant differences were found in terms of feasibility, procedure fluoroscopy and freezing times, nadir temperatures, and acute PVI. CONCLUSIONS: CB-A PVI with the AC-A is feasible and safe in all PVs. The AC-A has proven significantly superior in visualising RTR if compared to the AC, affording RTR in 74% of PVs.
AIMS: Real Time Recordings (RTR) of pulmonary vein (PV) activity provide important information in the setting of the 2nd generation Cryoballoon (CB-A), as a funcion of time to isolation. Visualization of RTR with the standard inner lumen mapping catheter (ILMC) 20mm Achieve (AC) is possible in roughly 50% of PVs. A novel 25mm-Achieve Advance (AC-A) has been developed with the aim of increasing the detection of RTR. The purpose of this study is to compare the AC-A with the AC, to feasibility and improvement of RTR. METHODS: We assigned 50 patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation to CB-A PVI, using the AC-A as ILMC. We compared this group with 50 patients, matched for age and left atrial volume, who previously underwent the CB-A PVI using the AC. RESULTS: RTR were more frequently observed with the AC-A than with the AC (74% vs 49%; p= 0.02). RTR in the left superior PVs was similar in both groups (74% vs 72%, p= 0.8). RTR with the AC-A were equally appreciated in left or right sided, superior or inferior PVs. No significant differences were found in terms of feasibility, procedure fluoroscopy and freezing times, nadir temperatures, and acute PVI. CONCLUSIONS: CB-A PVI with the AC-A is feasible and safe in all PVs. The AC-A has proven significantly superior in visualising RTR if compared to the AC, affording RTR in 74% of PVs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Achieve Advance Catheter; Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation; Real Time Recordings; Time To Pulmonary Vein Isolation
Authors: Antonio Sorgente; Gian Battista Chierchia; Carlo de Asmundis; Andrea Sarkozy; Mehdi Namdar; Lucio Capulzini; Yoshinao Yazaki; Stephan-Andreas Müller-Burri; Fatih Bayrak; Pedro Brugada Journal: Europace Date: 2010-10-25 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Roland R Tilz; K R Julian Chun; Andreas Metzner; Andre Burchard; Erik Wissner; Buelent Koektuerk; Melanie Konstantinidou; Dieter Nuyens; Tom De Potter; Kars Neven; Alexander Fürnkranz; Feifan Ouyang; Boris Schmidt Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2010-03-04
Authors: Michael Kühne; Sven Knecht; David Altmann; Peter Ammann; Beat Schaer; Stefan Osswald; Christian Sticherling Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Gian Battista Chierchia; Carlo de Asmundis; Stephan-Andreas Müller-Burri; Andrea Sarkozy; Lucio Capulzini; Gaetano Paparella; Sergio Chierchia; Markus Roos; Pedro Brugada Journal: Europace Date: 2008-12-22 Impact factor: 5.214