BACKGROUND: Balloon ablation catheters using various energy sources are being developed to perform pulmonary vein (PV) isolation to treat atrial fibrillation. Prior evaluations of 2D CT/MR images are limited by the frequent elliptical shape of the PV ostia, the nonorthogonal orientation of the PVs to the left atrial (LA) chamber, and difficulty in appreciating through-slice curvature. To provide anatomical data relevant to balloon catheter ablation, 3D surface reconstructions of LA-PVs were generated and analyzed to define ostial architecture and size. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using MRI datasets obtained from 101 paroxysmal AF patients, the LA-PVs were segmented to generate 3D LA-PV surface reconstructions. Using both external and endoluminal projections, the PV ostial and antral regions were identified and evaluated. In the left PVs, a common left-sided ostium was identified in 94 patients, with an ostial circumference of 95 +/- 15 mm. Branching of the left PVs occurred 0-5 mm away from the common left ostium in 43 patients (43%), 5-15 mm away from the common os in 37 patients (37%), and >15 mm away from the common os in 14 patients (14%). In patients with either distinct left PV ostia, or common os <15 mm (87 patients), the individual LSPV/LIPV ostial circumferences were 67 +/- 12 mm and 58 +/- 9 mm, respectively. Mean left antral circumference was 114 +/- 17 mm. In the right PVs, the ostial circumferences of the RSPV/RIPV were 68 +/- 11 mm and 66 +/- 11 mm, respectively. Mean right antral circumference was 107 +/- 19 mm. Assuming ideal deformation of the LA chamber anatomy, the minimal diameters of a balloon ablation catheter required to isolate 95% of the RSPV, RIPV, LSPV, LIPV, LCPV, left antrum, and right antrum are 29 mm, 28 mm, 29 mm, 24 mm, 40 mm, 46 mm, and 47 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Analysis of 3D surface reconstructions of LA-PV anatomy reveals that balloon catheter-based ablation of the PVs is likely feasible in most patients, but balloon ablation of the common PV antra would be problematic.
BACKGROUND: Balloon ablation catheters using various energy sources are being developed to perform pulmonary vein (PV) isolation to treat atrial fibrillation. Prior evaluations of 2D CT/MR images are limited by the frequent elliptical shape of the PV ostia, the nonorthogonal orientation of the PVs to the left atrial (LA) chamber, and difficulty in appreciating through-slice curvature. To provide anatomical data relevant to balloon catheter ablation, 3D surface reconstructions of LA-PVs were generated and analyzed to define ostial architecture and size. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using MRI datasets obtained from 101 paroxysmal AFpatients, the LA-PVs were segmented to generate 3D LA-PV surface reconstructions. Using both external and endoluminal projections, the PV ostial and antral regions were identified and evaluated. In the left PVs, a common left-sided ostium was identified in 94 patients, with an ostial circumference of 95 +/- 15 mm. Branching of the left PVs occurred 0-5 mm away from the common left ostium in 43 patients (43%), 5-15 mm away from the common os in 37 patients (37%), and >15 mm away from the common os in 14 patients (14%). In patients with either distinct left PV ostia, or common os <15 mm (87 patients), the individual LSPV/LIPV ostial circumferences were 67 +/- 12 mm and 58 +/- 9 mm, respectively. Mean left antral circumference was 114 +/- 17 mm. In the right PVs, the ostial circumferences of the RSPV/RIPV were 68 +/- 11 mm and 66 +/- 11 mm, respectively. Mean right antral circumference was 107 +/- 19 mm. Assuming ideal deformation of the LA chamber anatomy, the minimal diameters of a balloon ablation catheter required to isolate 95% of the RSPV, RIPV, LSPV, LIPV, LCPV, left antrum, and right antrum are 29 mm, 28 mm, 29 mm, 24 mm, 40 mm, 46 mm, and 47 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Analysis of 3D surface reconstructions of LA-PV anatomy reveals that balloon catheter-based ablation of the PVs is likely feasible in most patients, but balloon ablation of the common PV antra would be problematic.
Authors: Alexey Tsyganov; Jan Petru; Jan Skoda; Lucie Sediva; Pavel Hala; Jiri Weichet; Marek Janotka; Milan Chovanec; Petr Neuzil; Vivek Y Reddy Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Mark D O'Neill; Pierre Jaïs; Yoshihide Takahashi; Anders Jönsson; Frédéric Sacher; Mélèze Hocini; Prashanthan Sanders; Thomas Rostock; Martin Rotter; Andrej Pernat; Jacques Clémenty; Michel Haïssaguerre Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2006-11-14 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Maryam E Rettmann; David R Holmes; Jerome F Breen; Xin Ge; Ronald A Karwoski; Kristi H Monahan; Tristram D Bahnson; Douglas L Packer; Richard A Robb Journal: Comput Methods Programs Biomed Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Faisal M Merchant; Mathew R Levy; Shahriar Iravanian; Edward C Clermont; Heval M Kelli; Robert L Eisner; Mikhael F El-Chami; Angel R Leon; David B Delurgio Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Janice Y Chyou; Angelo Biviano; Pedro Magno; Hasan Garan; Andrew J Einstein Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2009-06-12 Impact factor: 1.900