BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon technique is an innovative alternative to radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, with current cryoballoon application techniques, the operator has no access to electrical information for 300 s during the freezing cycle. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the novel approach of real-time monitoring of pulmonary vein (PV) potentials throughout freezing using a circular mapping catheter introduced into the central lumen of the cryoballoon catheter. METHODS: Patients had paroxysmal or persistent AF. Standard balloon catheters (23 or 28 mm diameter, 10.5 F shaft) were used. A coaxial mapping catheter (shaft diameter 0.9 mm; 15 mm loop with six electrodes) was advanced through the lumen of the cryoballoon catheter, replacing the guide wire. The primary procedural end point was successful PV isolation and real-time PV potential recording. Secondary end points were procedural data, complications, and the time to successful PV isolation. RESULTS: In 141 consecutively enrolled patients, balloon positioning and ablation were successful in 439/568 veins (77%). Real-time recording of PV conduction during the freeze cycle was possible in 235/568 PVs (41%). Main reasons for failure to obtain real-time PV recordings were a distal position of the circular mapping catheter or insufficient catheter-vessel wall contact during ablation. A cutoff value of 83 s to PV isolation was predictive of stable procedural PV isolation without reconduction. One minor hemoptysis was observed possibly related to the mapping catheter. CONCLUSIONS: This study, the largest to date, showed that real-time monitoring of PV conduction during cryoballoon freezing can be safely performed with a circular mapping catheter. A cutoff time of 83 s to PV isolation was predictive of sustained procedural PV isolation success without reconduction.
BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon technique is an innovative alternative to radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, with current cryoballoon application techniques, the operator has no access to electrical information for 300 s during the freezing cycle. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the novel approach of real-time monitoring of pulmonary vein (PV) potentials throughout freezing using a circular mapping catheter introduced into the central lumen of the cryoballoon catheter. METHODS:Patients had paroxysmal or persistent AF. Standard balloon catheters (23 or 28 mm diameter, 10.5 F shaft) were used. A coaxial mapping catheter (shaft diameter 0.9 mm; 15 mm loop with six electrodes) was advanced through the lumen of the cryoballoon catheter, replacing the guide wire. The primary procedural end point was successful PV isolation and real-time PV potential recording. Secondary end points were procedural data, complications, and the time to successful PV isolation. RESULTS: In 141 consecutively enrolled patients, balloon positioning and ablation were successful in 439/568 veins (77%). Real-time recording of PV conduction during the freeze cycle was possible in 235/568 PVs (41%). Main reasons for failure to obtain real-time PV recordings were a distal position of the circular mapping catheter or insufficient catheter-vessel wall contact during ablation. A cutoff value of 83 s to PV isolation was predictive of stable procedural PV isolation without reconduction. One minor hemoptysis was observed possibly related to the mapping catheter. CONCLUSIONS: This study, the largest to date, showed that real-time monitoring of PV conduction during cryoballoon freezing can be safely performed with a circular mapping catheter. A cutoff time of 83 s to PV isolation was predictive of sustained procedural PV isolation success without reconduction.
Authors: Alvaro V Sarabanda; T Jared Bunch; Susan B Johnson; Srijoy Mahapatra; Mark A Milton; Luiz R Leite; G Keith Bruce; Douglas L Packer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-10-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Paul Khairy; Patrick Chauvet; John Lehmann; Jean Lambert; Laurent Macle; Jean-François Tanguay; Martin G Sirois; Domenic Santoianni; Marc Dubuc Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-03-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A Natale; E Pisano; J Shewchik; D Bash; R Fanelli; D Potenza; P Santarelli; R Schweikert; R White; W Saliba; L Kanagaratnam; P Tchou; M Lesh Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Humera Ahmed; Petr Neuzil; Jan Skoda; Andre D'Avila; David M Donaldson; Margaret C Laragy; Vivek Y Reddy Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2010-02-01
Authors: Douglas L Packer; Paul Keelan; Thomas M Munger; Jerome F Breen; Sam Asirvatham; Laura A Peterson; Kristi H Monahan; Mary F Hauser; K Chandrasekaran; Lawrence J Sinak; David R Holmes Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-02-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: K R Julian Chun; Alexander Fürnkranz; Andreas Metzner; Boris Schmidt; Roland Tilz; Thomas Zerm; Ilka Köster; Dieter Nuyens; Erik Wissner; Feifan Ouyang; Karl Heinz Kuck Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2009-07-13
Authors: Thomas Neumann; Jürgen Vogt; Burghard Schumacher; Anja Dorszewski; Malte Kuniss; Hans Neuser; Klaus Kurzidim; Alexander Berkowitsch; Marcus Koller; Johannes Heintze; Ursula Scholz; Ulrike Wetzel; Michael A E Schneider; Dieter Horstkotte; Christian W Hamm; Heinz-Friedrich Pitschner Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-07-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Giacomo Mugnai; Carlo de Asmundis; Burak Hünük; Erwin Ströker; Darragh Moran; Ebru Hacioglu; Diego Ruggiero; Jan Poelaert; Christian Verborgh; Vincent Umbrain; Stefan Beckers; Hugo Enrique Coutino-Moreno; Ken Takarada; Valentina de Regibus; Pedro Brugada; Gian-Battista Chierchia Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Martin Schmidt; Uwe Dorwarth; Florian Straube; Michael Wankerl; Jürgen Krieg; Alexander W Leber; Hans Ullrich Ebersberger; Marcos Daccarett; Armin Huber; Ernst Rummeny; Ellen Hoffmann Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Anja Schade; Burghard Schumacher; Johannes W Dietrich; Anke Langbein; Guido Groschup; Katrin Koucky; Joachim Krug; Carsten Stahl; Patrick Müller; Karin Nentwich; Markus Roos; Thomas Deneke Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2014-12-13 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Mansour Razminia; Hany Demo; Carlos Arrieta-Garcia; Oliver J D'Silva; Theodore Wang; Richard F Kehoe Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2014-06-30