| Literature DB >> 36200025 |
Yoko Inoue1,2, Osamu Machida1,3, Yosuke Kita4, Toshiyuki Yamamoto1,2.
Abstract
The guidelines provided by American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association of Molecular Pathology (AMP) (ACMG/AMP guidelines) suggest a framework for the classification of clinical variants. However, the interpretations can be inconsistent, with each definition sometimes proving to be ambiguous. In particular, there can be difficulty with interpretation of variants related to the X-linked recessive trait. To confirm whether there are biases in the interpretation of inherited traits, we reanalyzed variants reported prior to the release of the ACMG/AMP guidelines. As expected, the interpretation ratio as pathogenic or likely pathogenic was significantly lower for variants related to the X-linked recessive trait. Evaluation of variants related to the X-linked recessive trait, hence, need to consider whether the variant is identified only in males in accordance with the X-linked recessive trait. The ACMG/AMP guidelines should be revised to eliminate the bias revealed in this study. 2022, International Research and Cooperation Association for Bio & Socio - Sciences Advancement.Entities:
Keywords: ACMG/AMP guidelines; X-linked recessive; diagnostic odyssey; interpretation; sequence variant
Year: 2022 PMID: 36200025 PMCID: PMC9437996 DOI: 10.5582/irdr.2022.01067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intractable Rare Dis Res ISSN: 2186-3644