Literature DB >> 29987767

Proficiency-based training of medical students using virtual simulators for laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgery: results of a pilot study.

Andrea Moglia1, Sara Sinceri2, Vincenzo Ferrari2,3, Mauro Ferrari2, Franco Mosca2, Luca Morelli2,4.   

Abstract

Proficiency-based training has become essential in the training of surgeons such that on completion they can execute complex operations with novel surgical approaches including direct manual laparoscopic surgery (DMLS) and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS). To this effect, several virtual reality (VR) simulators have been developed. The objective of the present study was to assess and establish proficiency gain curves for medical students on VR simulators for DMLS and RALS. Five medical students participated in training course consisting of didactic teaching and practical hands-on training with VR simulators for DMLS and RALS. Evaluation of didactic component was by questionnaire completed by participating students, who also were required to undertake selected exercises to reach proficiency at each VR simulator: (1) 12 tasks on LapSim VR (Surgical Science, Gothenburg, Sweden) for DMLS, and (2) six selected exercises on the dV-Trainer Mimic (Seattle, WA, United States). The five medical students reached the 60% threshold on the questionnaire-based didactic component. During selected hands-on simulation on VR simulators, students with previous experience with simulators (n = 3) outperformed those without (n = 2) in ten out of twelve LapSim tasks and all six at dV-Trainer, by requiring fewer attempts to reach proficiency although the difference was not significant (p < 0.05). In this work, we developed a proficiency-based training program for medical undergraduates based on surgical simulation for DMLS and RALS.z. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the benefit of this program in stimulating interest for surgical career amongst medical students after the qualify.

Keywords:  Da Vinci simulator; Laparoscopy simulator; Proficiency based training; Robotic surgery simulator

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29987767     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-018-0559-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  8 in total

1.  Simulation-based robot-assisted surgical training: a health economic evaluation.

Authors:  Shabnam Rehman; Syed Johar Raza; Andrew P Stegemann; Kevin Zeeck; Rakeeba Din; Amanda Llewellyn; Lynn Dio; Michael Trznadel; Yong Won Seo; Ashirwad J Chowriappa; Thenkurussi Kesavadas; Kamran Ahmed; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 2.  A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery.

Authors:  Andrea Moglia; Vincenzo Ferrari; Luca Morelli; Mauro Ferrari; Franco Mosca; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Distribution of innate psychomotor skills recognized as important for surgical specialization in unconditioned medical undergraduates.

Authors:  Andrea Moglia; Luca Morelli; Vincenzo Ferrari; Mauro Ferrari; Franco Mosca; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The utility of endovascular simulation to improve technical performance and stimulate continued interest of preclinical medical students in vascular surgery.

Authors:  Jason T Lee; Mary Qiu; Mediget Teshome; Shyam S Raghavan; Maureen M Tedesco; Ronald L Dalman
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  Ex vivo technical skills training transfers to the operating room and enhances cognitive learning: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor Grantcharov; Adrian Harvey; Helen M Macrae
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Predictive validity of a training protocol using a robotic surgery simulator.

Authors:  Patrick Culligan; Emil Gurshumov; Christa Lewis; Jennifer Priestley; Jodie Komar; Charbel Salamon
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.091

Review 7.  A systematic review of surgical skills transfer after simulation-based training: laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy.

Authors:  Susan R Dawe; John A Windsor; Joris A J L Broeders; Patrick C Cregan; Peter J Hewett; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christian R Larsen; Jette L Soerensen; Teodor P Grantcharov; Torur Dalsgaard; Lars Schouenborg; Christian Ottosen; Torben V Schroeder; Bent S Ottesen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-05-14
  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Alternative uses of virtual simulators for laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgery for medical students.

Authors:  Gregorio Di Franco; Desirée Gianardi; Raffaella Berchiolli
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2019-01-08

2.  Proctored preceptorship model for learning eTEP repair for inguinal hernia for general surgery residents.

Authors:  Y Mnouskin; D Assaf; G Barkon-Steinberg; J Rachmuth; I Carmeli; A Keidar; S Rayman
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.920

3.  STELA (Smart TV and smartphone-basEd Laparoscopy TrAiner): a no-cost home-based trainer for beginners.

Authors:  J S Sandhu; Puneet Aggarwal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2020-04-30

4.  Medical Students' Attitude Towards Robotic Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Intessar Sultan; Mohammed Fuad Bardi; Abdulrahman Mohammed Baatta; Saif Almaghrabi; Rehab Abdelfattah Mohammed
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2022-01-11

5.  The role of virtual reality simulation in surgical training in the light of COVID-19 pandemic: Visual spatial ability as a predictor for improved surgical performance: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Guillermo Marcos Sommer; Johannes Broschewitz; Sabine Huppert; Christina Gesine Sommer; Nora Jahn; Boris Jansen-Winkeln; Ines Gockel; Hans-Michael Hau
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  [Robot-assisted surgery as an elective-fascinating lesson(s)?]

Authors:  Philip Zeuschner; Philippe Becker; Julia Heinzelbecker; Johannes Linxweiler; Stefan Siemer; Michael Stöckle; Matthias Saar
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Virtual Reality in Medical Students' Education: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Haowen Jiang; Sunitha Vimalesvaran; Jeremy King Wang; Kee Boon Lim; Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali; Lorainne Tudor Car
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2022-02-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.