Literature DB >> 24100339

A systematic review of surgical skills transfer after simulation-based training: laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy.

Susan R Dawe1, John A Windsor, Joris A J L Broeders, Patrick C Cregan, Peter J Hewett, Guy J Maddern.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A systematic review to determine whether skills acquired through simulation-based training transfer to the operating room for the procedures of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy.
BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training assumes that skills are directly transferable to the operation room, but only a few studies have investigated the effect of simulation-based training on surgical performance.
METHODS: A systematic search strategy that was used in 2006 was updated to retrieve relevant studies. Inclusion of articles was determined using a predetermined protocol, independent assessment by 2 reviewers, and a final consensus decision.
RESULTS: Seventeen randomized controlled trials and 3 nonrandomized comparative studies were included in this review. In most cases, simulation-based training was in addition to patient-based training programs. Only 2 studies directly compared simulation-based training in isolation with patient-based training. For laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 10 studies) and endoscopy (n = 10 studies), participants who reached simulation-based skills proficiency before undergoing patient-based assessment performed with higher global assessment scores and fewer errors in the operating room than their counterparts who did not receive simulation training. Not all parameters measured were improved. Two of the endoscopic studies compared simulation-based training in isolation with patient-based training with different results: for sigmoidoscopy, patient-based training was more effective, whereas for colonoscopy, simulation-based training was equally effective.
CONCLUSIONS: Skills acquired by simulation-based training seem to be transferable to the operative setting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy. Future research will strengthen these conclusions by evaluating predetermined competency levels on the same simulators and using objective validated global rating scales to measure operative performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24100339     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  45 in total

1.  Simulation for Teaching Orthopaedic Residents in a Competency-based Curriculum: Do the Benefits Justify the Increased Costs?

Authors:  Markku T Nousiainen; Sydney A McQueen; Peter Ferguson; Benjamin Alman; William Kraemer; Oleg Safir; Richard Reznick; Ranil Sonnadara
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Long-term knowledge retention following simulation-based training for electrosurgical safety: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Amin Madani; Yusuke Watanabe; Melina C Vassiliou; Pascal Fuchshuber; Daniel B Jones; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Virtual reality-based assessment of basic laparoscopic skills using the Leap Motion controller.

Authors:  Vasileios Lahanas; Constantinos Loukas; Konstantinos Georgiou; Hani Lababidi; Dania Al-Jaroudi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Proficiency-based training of medical students using virtual simulators for laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgery: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Andrea Moglia; Sara Sinceri; Vincenzo Ferrari; Mauro Ferrari; Franco Mosca; Luca Morelli
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-07-10

5.  A new experimental model of calculous cholecystitis suitable for the evaluation and training of minimally invasive approaches to cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ondrej Ryska; Zuzana Serclova; Jan Martinek; Radek Dolezel; Jaroslav Kalvach; Stefan Juhas; Jana Juhasova; Bohus Bunganic; Eva Laszikova; Miroslav Ryska
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Impact of a hands-on component on learning in the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy™ (FUSE) curriculum: a randomized-controlled trial in surgical trainees.

Authors:  Amin Madani; Yusuke Watanabe; Melina C Vassiliou; Pascal Fuchshuber; Daniel B Jones; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Simulation-trained junior residents perform better than general surgeons on advanced laparoscopic cases.

Authors:  Camilo Boza; Felipe León; Erwin Buckel; Arnoldo Riquelme; Fernando Crovari; Jorge Martínez; Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor Grantcharov; Nicolás Jarufe; Julián Varas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Training with cognitive load improves performance under similar conditions in a real surgical task.

Authors:  Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Coleman A Odlozil; Katerina O Wells; Steven G Leeds; Sanket Chauhan; James W Fleshman; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Gaitanidis; C Simopoulos; M Pitiakoudis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 10.  Role of simulation in training the next generation of endoscopists.

Authors:  Simon C Blackburn; Stephen J Griffin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.