Literature DB >> 299877

Food and intracranial stimulation responding suppressed with regular-interval shock.

E Schmidt, M McCaleb, H K Merrill.   

Abstract

Attenuation of conditioned suppression during intracranial stimulation was compared with that during food reinforcement. Response rates controlled by food and by brain stimulation were equalized on a multiple schedule by adjusting the stimulating current. When foot shock was delivered during timeout periods separating response components, responding for food was significantly more suppressed than responding for brain stimulation. When components were shortened from 10 to 2 minutes, responding maintained by either food or brain stimulation showed a similar temporal pattern of suppression preceding each shock, but responding in the component involving food remained significantly more suppressed. Explanations for the attenuated suppression during brain stimulation based on neural disruption, stimulus blocking, and analgesic properties were questioned. The increased responding during brain stimulation seemed to reflect greater response strength relative to food reinforced responding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 299877      PMCID: PMC1333561          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Conditioned suppression of behavior maintained by intracranial stimulation as a function of stimulation intensity.

Authors:  P J Russell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Some effects of limbic system selfstimulation upon conditioned emotional behavior.

Authors:  J V BRADY; D G CONRAD
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1960-04

3.  Response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Attenuation of Aversive Properties of Peripheral Shock by Hypothalamic Stimulation.

Authors:  V C Cox; E S Valenstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Pain-reducing properties of rewarding electrical brain stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  M D Rose
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1974-10

6.  Alteration in footschock threshold by low-level septal brain stimulation.

Authors:  V Breglio; D C Anderson; H K Merrill
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1970-07

7.  Effect of punishment on lever pressing maintained by food reward or brain stimulation.

Authors:  I Geller
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1970-02

8.  Attenuation of a conditioned emotional response via reinforcing intracranial stimulation in rats.

Authors:  H K Merrill; W J Lott; B J Bergen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1970-06

9.  Effects of noncontingent septal stimulation on the CER in the rat.

Authors:  R Goldstein
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-02

10.  Response rate, reinforcement frequency, and conditioned suppression.

Authors:  D Blackman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.