Literature DB >> 29987604

Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes Following Robotic Liver Resections for Primary Hepatobiliary Malignancies: A Multicenter Study.

Sidrah Khan1, Rachel E Beard2, Peter T Kingham3, Yuman Fong4, Thomas Boerner3, John B Martinie5, Dioneses Vrochides5, Joseph F Buell6, Eren Berber7, Bora Kahramangil7, Roberto I Troisi8, Aude Vanlander8, Michele Molinari1, Allan Tsung9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Robotic liver surgery (RLS) has emerged as a feasible alternative to laparoscopic or open resections with comparable perioperative outcomes. Little is known about the oncologic adequacy of RLS. The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term oncologic outcomes for patients undergoing RLS for primary hepatobiliary malignancies.
METHODS: We performed an international, multicenter, retrospective study of patients who underwent RLS for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CC), or gallbladder cancer (GBC) between 2006 and 2016. Age, gender, histology, resection margin status, extent of surgical resection, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: Of the 61 included patients, 34 (56%) had RLS performed for HCC, 16 (26%) for CC, and 11 (18%) for GBC. The majority of resections were nonanatomical or segmental resections (39.3%), followed by central hepatectomy (18%), left-lateral sectionectomy (14.8%), left hepatectomy (13.1%), right hepatectomy (13.1%), and right posterior segmentectomy (1.6%). R0 resection was achieved in 94% of HCC, 68% of CC, and 81.8% of GBC patients. Median hospital stay was 5 days, and conversion to open surgery was needed in seven patients (11.5%). Grade III-IV Dindo-Clavien complications occurred in seven patients with no perioperative mortality. Median follow-up was 75 months (95% confidence interval 36-113), and 5-year OS and DFS were 56 and 38%, respectively. When stratified by tumor type, 3-year OS was 90% for HCC, 65% for GBC, and 49% for CC (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: RLS can be performed for primary hepatobiliary malignancies with long-term oncologic outcomes comparable to published open and laparoscopic data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29987604      PMCID: PMC6133735          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6629-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  44 in total

1.  Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Andrea Coratti; Fabio Sbrana; Pietro Addeo; Francesco Maria Bianco; Nicolas Christian Buchs; Mario Annechiarico; Enrico Benedetti
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Comparative study and systematic review of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei Qi Leong; Iyer Shridhar Ganpathi; Alfred Wei Chieh Kow; Krishnakumar Madhavan; Stephen Kin Yong Chang
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-11-28

3.  Comparison of perioperative and oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Woohyung Lee; Ji-Ho Park; Ju-Yeon Kim; Seung-Jin Kwag; Taejin Park; Sang-Ho Jeong; Young-Tae Ju; Eun-Jung Jung; Young-Joon Lee; Soon-Chan Hong; Sang-Kyung Choi; Chi-Young Jeong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Long-term results of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-matched analysis.

Authors:  Kit Fai Lee; Ching Ning Chong; Jeff Wong; Yue Sun Cheung; John Wong; Paul Lai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in posterosuperior segments.

Authors:  Le Xiao; Lun-jian Xiang; Jian-wei Li; Jian Chen; Yu-dong Fan; Shu-guo Zheng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy for suspected early gall bladder carcinoma: thinking beyond convention.

Authors:  Senthilnathan Palanisamy; Nikunj Patel; Sandeep Sabnis; Nalankilli Palanisamy; Anand Vijay; Praveenraj Palanivelu; R Parthasarthi; Palanivelu Chinnusamy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph F Buell; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Nicholas O'Rourke; David Iannitti; Ibrahim Dagher; Alan J Koffron; Mark Thomas; Brice Gayet; Ho Seong Han; Go Wakabayashi; Giulio Belli; Hironori Kaneko; Chen-Guo Ker; Olivier Scatton; Alexis Laurent; Eddie K Abdalla; Prosanto Chaudhury; Erik Dutson; Clark Gamblin; Michael D'Angelica; David Nagorney; Giuliano Testa; Daniel Labow; Derrik Manas; Ronnie T Poon; Heidi Nelson; Robert Martin; Bryan Clary; Wright C Pinson; John Martinie; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Robert Goldstein; Sasan Roayaie; David Barlet; Joseph Espat; Michael Abecassis; Myrddin Rees; Yuman Fong; Kelly M McMasters; Christoph Broelsch; Ron Busuttil; Jacques Belghiti; Steven Strasberg; Ravi S Chari
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients.

Authors:  Kevin Tri Nguyen; T Clark Gamblin; David A Geller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive liver resection.

Authors:  Yao-Ming Wu; Rey-Heng Hu; Hong-Shiee Lai; Po-Huang Lee
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.767

Review 10.  Hepatobiliary Tumors: Update on Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Ghassan Kabbach; Hussein A Assi; George Bolotin; Michael Schuster; Hwa Jeong Lee; Micheal Tadros
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2015-09-15
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Surgery for Malignant Liver Disease: a Systematic Review of Oncological and Surgical Outcomes.

Authors:  Rafael Diaz-Nieto; Soumil Vyas; Dinesh Sharma; Hassan Malik; Stephen Fenwick; Graeme Poston
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-06-13

2.  ASO Author Reflections: The Evolution of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery and the Future with Robotics.

Authors:  Sidrah Khan; Allan Tsung
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Laparoscopic Approach to Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma is Associated with an Exacerbation of Inadequate Nodal Staging.

Authors:  Sean P Martin; Justin Drake; Michael M Wach; Samantha Ruff; Laurence P Diggs; Jim Y Wan; Zachary J Brown; Reed I Ayabe; Evan S Glazer; Paxton V Dickson; Jeremy L Davis; Jeremiah L Deneve; Jonathan M Hernandez
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Long-Term and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Rachel E Beard; Sidrah Khan; Roberto I Troisi; Roberto Montalti; Aude Vanlander; Yuman Fong; T Peter Kingham; Thomas Boerner; Eren Berber; Bora Kahramangil; Joseph F Buell; John B Martinie; Dionisios Vrochides; Chengli Shen; Michele Molinari; David A Geller; Allan Tsung
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Robotic hepatectomy for benign and malignant liver tumors.

Authors:  Iswanto Sucandy; Sydni Schlosser; Timothy Bourdeau; Janelle Spence; Abdelrahman Attili; Sharona Ross; Alexander Rosemurgy
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-02-23

6.  Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Inconsistent Outcomes from Matched or Weighted Cohorts.

Authors:  Lu Wu; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Katiuscha Merath; J Madison Hyer; Anghela Z Paredes; Rittal Mehta; Kota Sahara; Fabio Bagante; Eliza W Beal; Feng Shen; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Robot-assisted liver resection: the real benefit so far.

Authors:  Reed I Ayabe; Ahad Azimuddin; Hop S Tran Cao
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Short- and Long-term Outcomes after Robotic and Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Malignancies: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Authors:  Chetana Lim; Chady Salloum; Antonella Tudisco; Claudio Ricci; Michael Osseis; Niccolo Napoli; Eylon Lahat; Ugo Boggi; Daniel Azoulay
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nikolaos Machairas; Ioannis D Kostakis; Dimitrios Schizas; Stylianos Kykalos; Nikolaos Nikiteas; Georgios C Sotiropoulos
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-11-21

Review 10.  Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis A Ziogas; Dimitrios Giannis; Stepan M Esagian; Konstantinos P Economopoulos; Samer Tohme; David A Geller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.