Literature DB >> 19801936

World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients.

Kevin Tri Nguyen1, T Clark Gamblin, David A Geller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide a review of the world literature on laparoscopic liver resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Initially described for peripheral, benign tumors resected by nonanatomic wedge resections, minimally invasive liver resections are now being performed more frequently, even for larger, malignant tumors located in challenging locations. Although a few small review articles have been reported, a comprehensive review on laparoscopic liver resection has not been published.
METHODS: We conducted a literature search using Pubmed, screening all English publications on laparoscopic liver resections. All data were analyzed and apparent case duplications in updated series were excluded from the total number of patients. Tumor type, operative characteristics, perioperative morbidity, and oncologic outcomes were tabulated.
RESULTS: A total of 127 published articles of original series on laparoscopic liver resection were identified, and accounted for 2,804 reported minimally invasive liver resections. Fifty percent were for malignant tumors, 45% were for benign lesions, 1.7% were for live donor hepatectomies, and the rest were indeterminate. Of the resections, 75% were performed totally laparoscopically, 17% were hand-assisted, and 2% were laparoscopic-assisted open hepatic resection (hybrid) technique, with the remainder being other techniques or conversions to open hepatectomies. The most common laparoscopic liver resection was a wedge resection or segmentectomy (45%) followed by anatomic left lateral sectionectomy (20%), right hepatectomy (9%), and left hepatectomy (7%). Conversion from laparoscopy to open laparotomy and from laparoscopy to hand-assisted approach occurred in 4.1% and 0.7% of reported cases, respectively. Overall mortality was 9 of 2,804 patients (0.3%), and morbidity was 10.5%, with no intraoperative deaths reported. The most common cause of postoperative death was liver failure. Postoperative bile leak was observed in 1.5% of cases. For cancer resections, negative surgical margins were achieved in 82% to 100% of reported series. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates after laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma were 50% to 75% and 31% to 38.2%, respectively. The 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates after laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal metastasis to the liver were 80% to 87% and 51%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In experienced hands, laparoscopic liver resections are safe with acceptable morbidity and mortality for both minor and major hepatic resections. Oncologically, 3- and 5-year survival rates reported for hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer metastases are comparable to open hepatic resection, albeit in a selected group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19801936     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4df

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  379 in total

Review 1.  The laparoscopic liver resections-an initial experience and the literature review.

Authors:  Mislav Rakić; Leonardo Patrlj; Robert Kliček; Mario Kopljar; Antonija Duzel; Kristijan Cupurdija; Zeljko Bušić
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing liver resection of lesions in the central segments: feasible, safe, and effective.

Authors:  Claudius Conrad; Satoshi Ogiso; Yosuke Inoue; Nairuthya Shivathirthan; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic vs open left hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis.

Authors:  Jin-Fu Tu; Fei-Zhao Jiang; Heng-Liang Zhu; Ru-Ying Hu; Wei-Jian Zhang; Zhen-Xu Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Brendan C Visser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Feasibility of bloodless liver resection using Lumagel, a reverse thermoplastic polymer, to produce temporary, targeted hepatic blood flow interruption.

Authors:  James J Pomposelli; Mohamed Akoad; Sebastian Flacke; James J Benn; Mauricio Solano; Aarti Kalra; Peter N Madras
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Gi Hong Choi; Sung Hoon Choi; Sung Hoon Kim; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Chang Moo Kang; Jin Sub Choi; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A novel extra-glissonian approach for totally laparoscopic left hepatectomy.

Authors:  Fernando Rotellar; Fernando Pardo; Alberto Benito; Pablo Martí-Cruchaga; Gabriel Zozaya; Nicolás Pedano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hepatic and Pancreatic Resections Among the Medicare Population.

Authors:  Qinyu Chen; Katiuscha Merath; Fabio Bagante; Ozgur Akgul; Mary Dillhoff; Jordan Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Single center experience of laparoscopic hepatectomy: the comparison of perioperative outcomes between early and late period.

Authors:  Seung Hyeon Son; Hong Jin Kim; Sung Su Yun; Dong Shik Lee; Dong Hyeon Lee
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2012-02-29

10.  Laparoscopic bisegmentectomy 6 and 7 using a Glissonian approach and a half-Pringle maneuver.

Authors:  Paulo Herman; Jaime Krüger; Renato Lupinacci; Fabricio Coelho; Marcos Perini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.