| Literature DB >> 29984240 |
Mohammad Amin Ghatee1,2, Hossein Mirhendi3, Masoud Marashifard1, Zahra Kanannejad4, Walter R Taylor5,6, Iraj Sharifi7.
Abstract
Iran is one of the six countries with the most cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) patients. Understanding better the genotypes of the parasite population in relation to geography and climate is critical to achieving better CL control. We aimed to characterise the population structure of Leishmania tropica, the cause of anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL), from important foci in southeast (Bam and Kerman) and southwest (Shiraz) Iran. A total of 39 L. tropica isolates from ACL patients from southeast (Bam 14, Kerman 12) and southwest (Shiraz 13) Iran were analysed by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) of the kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) using restriction enzymes MspI (HpaII) and ClaI. 37 genotypes were identified among south Iran L. tropica isolates. The unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) tree obtained from the banding patterns of ClaI digested kDNA RFLP distinguished southeast from and southwest L. tropica isolates with some subclustering but the MspI derived tree showed greater discrimination with greater subclustering and divergence of the two foci of southeast region but with some overlapping. Although a monophyletic structure has been defined for southeast L. tropica, isolates from two foci of southeast Iran were partly discriminated in the current study.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29984240 PMCID: PMC6011176 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6049198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Map (down to county level) showing the main foci of Leishmania tropica in Iran. Kerman, Bam, Shiraz, Tehran, and Mashhad are the traditional endemic foci (red polygons). Birjand and Yazd have seen recent introductions of L. tropica (pink). L. tropica has not been reported from Esfahan in recent years (yellow).
The patient's demographic and lesion data.
| Patient's data | percent |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Male | 48.7 |
| Female | 51.3 |
| Total | 100 |
| Age | |
| <10 | 28.2 |
| 10-20 | 23.1 |
| 20-60 | 41 |
| >60 | 7.7 |
| Total | 100 |
| Lesion sites | |
| Face and neck | 35.9 |
| One hand | 38.4 |
| Both hands | 7.7 |
| One leg | 12.8 |
| Both legs | 2.6 |
| Hand and leg | 2.6 |
| Total | 100 |
Figure 2The banding patterns obtained by digestion of kDNA of the same samples by the enzymes ClaI (right) and MspI (left). The higher number of bands was obviously obtained when MspI was used. B14-B17 samples were from Kerman and B18 and b19 were obtained from Bam and Shiraz, respectively.
Figure 3The UPGMA generated tree based on the banding patterns obtained from digestion of kDNA with ClaI enzyme showing clusters 1 and 2 and subclusters (A-D) of cluster 1. Subclusters A to C comprise most genotypes from Bam and Kerman and subcluster D most genotypes from Shiraz.
Figure 4The UPGMA generated tree based on the banding patterns obtained from digestion of kDNA with MspI enzyme (n=34 genotypes). Cluster A isolates, except one, were from Shiraz. Cluster B included only isolates from Kerman and Bam.
The samples ID, geographical origin, and related GM, GC, and GM-GC genotypes (banding patterns).
| Isolate ID | Geographical origin | Genotypes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bam (SE) | Kerman (SE) | Shiraz (SW) | GM | GC | GM-GC | |
| B1 | ✔ | GM1 | GC1 | GM1-GC1 | ||
| B2 | ✔ | GM3 | GC17 |
| ||
| B3 | ✔ | GM6 | GC2 | GM6-GC2 | ||
| B4 | ✔ | GM3 | GC17 |
| ||
| B5 | ✔ | GM4 | GC18 | GM4-GC18 | ||
| B6 | ✔ | GM1 | GC17 | GM1-GC17 | ||
| B7 | ✔ | GM12 | GC1 | GM12-GC1 | ||
| B8 | ✔ | GM13 | GC4 | GM13-GC4 | ||
| B9 | ✔ | GM14 | GC11 | GM14-GC11 | ||
| B10 | ✔ | GM16 | GC8 | GM16-GC8 | ||
| B11 | ✔ | GM30 | GC13 | GM30-GC13 | ||
| B12 | ✔ | GM19 | GC12 | GM19-GC12 | ||
| B13 | ✔ | GM17 | GC2 |
| ||
| B14 | ✔ | GM20 | GC23 | GM20-GC23 | ||
| B15 | ✔ | GM17 | GC2 |
| ||
| B16 | ✔ | GM32 | GC2 | GM32-GC2 | ||
| B17 | ✔ | GM31 | GC15 | GM31-GC15 | ||
| B18 | ✔ | GM14 | GC9 | GM14-GC9 | ||
| B19 | ✔ | GM7 | GC19 | GM7-GC19 | ||
| B20 | ✔ | GM33 | GC20 | GM33-GC20 | ||
| B21 | ✔ | GM9 | GC19 | GM9-GC19 | ||
| B22 | ✔ | GM8 | GC21 | GM8-GC21 | ||
| B23 | ✔ | GM2 | GC7 | GM2-GC7 | ||
| B24 | ✔ | GM5 | GC22 | GM5-GC22 | ||
| B25 | ✔ | GM10 | GC18 | GM10-GC18 | ||
| B26 | ✔ | GM34 | GC5 | GM34-GC5 | ||
| B27 | ✔ | GM21 | GC6 | GM21-GC6 | ||
| B28 | ✔ | GM22 | GC5 | GM22-GC5 | ||
| B29 | ✔ | GM23 | GC8 | GM23-GC8 | ||
| B30 | ✔ | GM11 | GC16 | GM11-GC16 | ||
| B31 | ✔ | GM18 | GC15 | GM18-GC15 | ||
| B32 | ✔ | GM15 | GC10 | GM15-GC10 | ||
| B33 | ✔ | GM25 | GC2 | GM25-GC2 | ||
| B34 | ✔ | GM25 | GC3 | GM25-GC3 | ||
| B35 | ✔ | GM28 | GC24 | GM28-GC24 | ||
| B36 | ✔ | GM24 | GC1 | GM24-GC1 | ||
| B37 | ✔ | GM26 | GC14 | GM26-GC14 | ||
| B38 | ✔ | GM27 | GC3 | GM27-GC3 | ||
| B39 | ✔ | GM29 | GC9 | GM29-GC9 | ||
∗ indicates that the genotypes were found in more than one isolate in one geographical focus.
∗∗ and ∗∗∗ indicate that the genotypes were found in more than one isolate in two and all three geographical foci, respectively.
The underlined GM-GC genotypes (GM17-GC2 and GM17-GC2) are found in more than one isolate. 37 GM-GC genotypes were identified from 39 L. tropica isolates.