Literature DB >> 35039893

Functional outcomes and perceived quality of life following fixation of femoral neck fractures in adults from 18 to 69 years using dynamic hip screw (DHS) and an additional anti-rotation screw- a retrospective analysis of 53 patients after a mean follow-up time of 4 years.

Anne Fjeld1, Tim Fülling2, Philipp Bula1,3, Felix Bonnaire1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study was to explore the functional outcome after osteosynthesis with dynamic hip screw (DHS) for adults up to 69 years, and identify potential predictive indicators of either positive impact on quality of life or increase the incidence of complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Out of 85 patients 53 could be contacted, 36 were followed up clinically and radiologically, 17 patients could be interviewed by phone. All fractures have been treated by osteosynthesis with DHS and one additional anti-rotation screw. Functional outcome and quality of life were measured with use of Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF 12). The mean values were compared to two random sample t tests and ANOVA for independent random samples. The connection between an aim variable and selected variables of influence was examined by regression analysis.
RESULTS: The mean HHS showed good functional results with 88 points (median 95.6). Good or excellent results were achieved in 80.4% of cases. The current investigation also delivers promising results with regard to the complication rate: avascular femoral head necrosis (AVN) in 11.3% of cases (n = 6), 9.4% showed non-union (n = 5) and cut out (n = 3) occurred in 5.7%. A secondary conversion to hip arthroplasty (n = 7) had a strong negative impact on everyday life (HHS = 63.3 points, Physical Health Summary Score SF-12 = 34.9 points).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study are promising showing uncomplicated fracture healing in 84.9% of intracapsular femoral neck fractures and a low incidence of complications after osteosynthesis with DHS in patients aged up to 69 years. The quality of the fracture reduction achieved in the axial view and a small tip apex index after an osteosynthetically treated femoral neck fracture with DHS are significant predictive indicators for complications. Diabetes, age > 65 years, osteoporosis, ASA III may also be significant factors for worse results, but showed no statistical significance in our analysis.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; DHS; Femoral neck fractures; Proximal femur

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35039893     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01855-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  40 in total

1.  The total costs of a displaced femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation and total hip replacement. A randomised study of 146 hips.

Authors:  Torsten Johansson; Margareta Bachrach-Lindström; Per Aspenberg; Dick Jonsson; Ola Wahlström
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The four-year functional result after a displaced subcapital hip fracture treated with three different surgical options.

Authors:  George Mouzopoulos; Michalis Stamatakos; Helen Arabatzi; George Vasiliadis; George Batanis; Anastasia Tsembeli; Mathaios Tzurbakis; Michalis Safioleas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Treatment of Young Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Suman Medda; Tyler Snoap; Eben A Carroll
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Early diagnosis of occult hip fractures MRI versus CT scan.

Authors:  O Lubovsky; M Liebergall; Y Mattan; Y Weil; R Mosheiff
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Biomechanical Evaluation of the Femoral Neck System in Unstable Pauwels III Femoral Neck Fractures: A Comparison with the Dynamic Hip Screw and Cannulated Screws.

Authors:  Karl Stoffel; Ivan Zderic; Florian Gras; Christoph Sommer; Ursula Eberli; David Mueller; Martin Oswald; Boyko Gueorguiev
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Hemarthrosis and hip joint pressure in femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  F Bonnaire; D J Schaefer; E H Kuner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Management of femoral neck fractures in the young patient: A critical analysis review.

Authors:  Thierry Pauyo; Justin Drager; Anthony Albers; Edward J Harvey
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

8.  Clinical outcome after undisplaced femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Jonas M Fevang; Kjell Matre; Tarjei Vinje; Lars B Engesæter
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Outcomes of internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for elderly patients with an undisplaced femoral neck fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hsuan-Hsiao Ma; Te-Feng Arthur Chou; Shang-Wen Tsai; Cheng-Fong Chen; Po-Kuei Wu; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of elderly displaced femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Junhao Deng; Guoqi Wang; Jia Li; Song Wang; Miao Li; Xiaohong Yin; Licheng Zhang; Peifu Tang
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2020-12-22
View more
  1 in total

1.  The efficacy of dynamic compression locking system vs. dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jian-Zhong Chang; Ya-Ping Xiao; Ling Li; Ming-Jian Bei
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.562

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.