| Literature DB >> 29980729 |
Hongtao Tang1, Zhenzhen Cheng2, Wenlong Ma1, Youwen Liu1, Zhaofang Tong1, Ruibo Sun1, Hongliang Liu3.
Abstract
Multiple lines of evidence have confirmed the importance of genetic factors for hip osteoarthritis (HOA). Our study aimed to investigate the associations of TLR10 and NFKBIA with respect to the HOA risk in Han Chinese individuals. A total of 1,043 HOA patients and 2,664 controls were recruited. Then, 23 tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TLR10 and NFKBIA genes were selected for genotyping. Genetic association analyses were conducted in both single-marker and haplotype-based ways. Gene by gene, two-way interactions were analysed using a case-only method. Multiple bioinformatics tools were utilised to examine the potential functional significance of the SNPs. Two significant SNPs, rs11096957 (OR = 1.26, P = 1.35 × 10-5) and rs2273650 (OR = 1.2, P = 1.57 × 10-3), were significantly associated with HOA risk. Rs11096957 was also associated with the severity of the HOA. Bioinformatics analysis indicated that the allele T of rs2273650 would create new miRNA/SNP target duplexes, which suggests that rs2273650 could alter the NFKBIA expression by affecting the miRNA/SNP target duplexes. Our study identified significant association signals from NFKBIA with HOA for the first time, and it also confirmed the contribution of TLR10 to the HOA risk. These findings would provide clues for identifying individuals at high risk of HOA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29980729 PMCID: PMC6035240 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28597-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristic information of study subjects.
| HOA patients (N = 1,043) | controls (N = 2,664) | statistics |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean ± sd | 61.8 ± 8.0 | 60.7 ± 8.1 | t = 3.97 | 7.41 × 10−5 |
| BMI, mean ± sd | 26.2 ± 1.5 | 25.8 ± 1.5 | t = 7.15 | 1.23 × 10−12 |
| Gender (%) | ||||
| Male | 497 (48) | 1287 (48) | ||
| Female | 546 (52) | 1377 (52) | χ2 = 0.11 | 0.7452 |
| Smoking (%) | ||||
| Yes | 248 (24) | 618 (23) | ||
| No | 795 (76) | 2046 (77) | χ2 = 0.11 | 0.7401 |
| Drinking alcohol(%) | ||||
| Yes | 307 (29) | 815 (31) | ||
| No | 736 (71) | 1849 (69) | χ2 = 0.42 | 0.5152 |
| Occupation (%) | ||||
| Managerial | 446 (43) | 1162 (44) | ||
| Non-managerial | 597 (57) | 1502 (56) | χ2 = 0.19 | 0.6623 |
| Activity (%) | ||||
| Inactive | 400 (38) | 1042 (39) | ||
| Less active | 366 (35) | 981 (37) | ||
| More active | 277 (27) | 641 (24) | χ2 = 2.62 | 0.2701 |
| KL grading scale (%) | ||||
| KL-2 | 510 (49) | — | ||
| KL-3 | 388 (37) | — | ||
| KL-4 | 145 (14) | — | — | — |
Results of single marker based association analyses for SNPs of NFKBIA and TLR10.
| CHR | SNP | POS | A1 | Gene | Function | MAF | HWE | OR |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | rs78826685 | 38773942 | C |
| untranslated-3 | 0.06 | 0.72 | 1.07 | 0.55 |
| 4 | rs9715769 | 38774489 | C |
| untranslated-3 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.99 | 0.82 |
| 4 | rs11466658 | 38775639 | A |
| missense | 0.08 | 0.59 | 0.95 | 0.63 |
| 4 | rs11466655 | 38776070 | T |
| missense | 0.22 | 0.82 | 0.98 | 0.70 |
| 4 | rs145872263 | 38776355 | C |
| missense | 0.07 | 0.16 | 1.05 | 0.66 |
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 4 | rs10856838 | 38777173 | T |
| coding-synon | 0.19 | 0.71 | 1.04 | 0.55 |
| 4 | rs10002420 | 38779213 | A |
| intron | 0.10 | 1.00 | 1.06 | 0.50 |
| 4 | rs4130727 | 38781113 | G |
| intron | 0.09 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.80 |
| 4 | rs9997988 | 38782843 | C |
| intron | 0.15 | 0.94 | 1.02 | 0.82 |
| 4 | rs59672618 | 38783171 | C |
| intron | 0.09 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.42 |
| 4 | rs79030744 | 38783588 | C |
| intron | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.93 | 0.34 |
| 4 | rs10031946 | 38783840 | G |
| intron | 0.08 | 0.49 | 1.01 | 0.88 |
| 4 | rs11725309 | 38783848 | T |
| intron | 0.49 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.36 |
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 14 | rs8904 | 35871217 | A |
| untranslated-3 | 0.40 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.88 |
| 14 | rs1022714 | 35871407 | A |
| intron | 0.23 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.67 |
| 14 | rs2233416 | 35872765 | A |
| intron | 0.07 | 0.52 | 1.07 | 0.52 |
| 14 | rs2233415 | 35872792 | A |
| intron | 0.35 | 0.76 | 1.02 | 0.78 |
| 14 | rs1050851 | 35872926 | A |
| coding-synon | 0.03 | 0.47 | 0.90 | 0.52 |
| 14 | rs2233411 | 35873567 | T |
| intron | 0.11 | 0.76 | 0.97 | 0.70 |
| 14 | rs1957106 | 35873770 | A |
| coding-synon | 0.23 | 0.44 | 1.00 | 0.96 |
| 14 | rs2273651 | 35873916 | T |
| untranslated-5 | 0.04 | 0.25 | 0.93 | 0.58 |
CHR: chromosome; POS: position; A1: tested allele; MAF: minor allele frequency; HWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test. Significant results were highlighted in bold.
Results of haplotype-based association analyses.
| Gene | SNPs | χ2 | DF |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| rs11466658–rs11466655 | 0.70 | 2 | 0.70 |
|
| rs10856838–rs10002420 | 0.44 | 2 | 0.80 |
|
| rs9997988–rs59672618 | 3.67 | 2 | 0.16 |
DF: degree of freedom. Significant result was highlighted in bold.
Association analyses of targeted SNPs with KL grading scale of HOA patients.
| SNP | KL Grading Scale (%) | χ2 |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs2273650 | TT (N = 101) | CT (N = 430) | CC (N = 512) | |||
|
| KL-2 | 50 (50) | 210 (49) | 250 (49) | ||
| KL-3 | 38 (38) | 160 (37) | 190 (37) | |||
| KL-4 | 13 (12) | 60 (14) | 72 (14) | 0.1 | 0.9987 | |
| rs11096957 | TT (N = 201) | GT (N = 486) | GG (N = 356) | |||
|
| KL-2 | 0 (0) | 154 (32) | 356 (100) | ||
| KL-3 | 56 (28) | 332 (68) | 0 (0) | |||
| KL-4 | 145 (72) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1188.9 | <0.0001 | |
Functional consequences for candidate SNPs based on bioinformatics analyses.
| Chr | Position | SNP | RegSc | Polyphen2 | SIFT | PolymiRTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 38776490 | rs11096957 | 7 | possibly damaging | DAMAGING | — |
| 14 | 35870797 | rs2273650 | 4 | — | — | The derived allele creates new miRNA site: |
RegSc: Score from RegulomeDB.
Figure 1The eQTL pattern of SNP rs11096957 for TLR10 in 45 human tissues. The P value threshold is indicated by the red dotted line.