Literature DB >> 29976574

Replication Stress Drives Constitutive Activation of the DNA Damage Response and Radioresistance in Glioblastoma Stem-like Cells.

Ross D Carruthers1, Shafiq U Ahmed2, Shaliny Ramachandran3, Karen Strathdee4, Kathreena M Kurian5, Ann Hedley6, Natividad Gomez-Roman4, Gabriela Kalna6, Mathew Neilson6, Lesley Gilmour4, Katrina H Stevenson4, Ester M Hammond3, Anthony J Chalmers4.   

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a lethal primary brain tumor characterized by treatment resistance and inevitable tumor recurrence, both of which are driven by a subpopulation of GBM cancer stem-like cells (GSC) with tumorigenic and self-renewal properties. Despite having broad implications for understanding GSC phenotype, the determinants of upregulated DNA-damage response (DDR) and subsequent radiation resistance in GSC are unknown and represent a significant barrier to developing effective GBM treatments. In this study, we show that constitutive DDR activation and radiation resistance are driven by high levels of DNA replication stress (RS). CD133+ GSC exhibited reduced DNA replication velocity and a higher frequency of stalled replication forks than CD133- non-GSC in vitro; immunofluorescence studies confirmed these observations in a panel of orthotopic xenografts and human GBM specimens. Exposure of non-GSC to low-level exogenous RS generated radiation resistance in vitro, confirming RS as a novel determinant of radiation resistance in tumor cells. GSC exhibited DNA double-strand breaks, which colocalized with "replication factories" and RNA: DNA hybrids. GSC also demonstrated increased expression of long neural genes (>1 Mbp) containing common fragile sites, supporting the hypothesis that replication/transcription collisions are the likely cause of RS in GSC. Targeting RS by combined inhibition of ATR and PARP (CAiPi) provided GSC-specific cytotoxicity and complete abrogation of GSC radiation resistance in vitro These data identify RS as a cancer stem cell-specific target with significant clinical potential.Significance: These findings shed new light on cancer stem cell biology and reveal novel therapeutics with the potential to improve clinical outcomes by overcoming inherent radioresistance in GBM. Cancer Res; 78(17); 5060-71. ©2018 AACR. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29976574      PMCID: PMC6128404          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  49 in total

1.  Common fragile sites are conserved features of human and mouse chromosomes and relate to large active genes.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Karen Stout-Weider; Klaus Hermann; Evelin Schrock; Thomas Heiden
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Replication foci dynamics: replication patterns are modulated by S-phase checkpoint kinases in fission yeast.

Authors:  Peter Meister; Angela Taddei; Aaron Ponti; Giuseppe Baldacci; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Brain stem cells as the cell of origin in glioma.

Authors:  Aram S Modrek; N Sumru Bayin; Dimitris G Placantonakis
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  The SynCAM synaptic cell adhesion molecules are involved in sensory axon pathfinding by regulating axon-axon contacts.

Authors:  Jeannine A Frei; Irwin Andermatt; Matthias Gesemann; Esther T Stoeckli
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Jirina Bartkova; Zuzana Horejsí; Karen Koed; Alwin Krämer; Frederic Tort; Karsten Zieger; Per Guldberg; Maxwell Sehested; Jahn M Nesland; Claudia Lukas; Torben Ørntoft; Jiri Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Common fragile sites, extremely large genes, neural development and cancer.

Authors:  David I Smith; Yu Zhu; Sarah McAvoy; Robert Kuhn
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 7.  Causes and consequences of replication stress.

Authors:  Michelle K Zeman; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  A restricted cell population propagates glioblastoma growth after chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Yanjiao Li; Tzong-Shiue Yu; Renée M McKay; Dennis K Burns; Steven G Kernie; Luis F Parada
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Replication stress and chromatin context link ATM activation to a role in DNA replication.

Authors:  Monica M Olcina; Iosifina P Foskolou; Selvakumar Anbalagan; Joana M Senra; Isabel M Pires; Yanyan Jiang; Anderson J Ryan; Ester M Hammond
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions.

Authors:  Daehwan Kim; Geo Pertea; Cole Trapnell; Harold Pimentel; Ryan Kelley; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  54 in total

Review 1.  Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Michael Weller; Eudocia Quant Lee; Brian M Alexander; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Floris P Barthel; Tracy T Batchelor; Ranjit S Bindra; Susan M Chang; E Antonio Chiocca; Timothy F Cloughesy; John F DeGroot; Evanthia Galanis; Mark R Gilbert; Monika E Hegi; Craig Horbinski; Raymond Y Huang; Andrew B Lassman; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Lim; Minesh P Mehta; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Giuseppe Minniti; David Nathanson; Michael Platten; Matthias Preusser; Patrick Roth; Marc Sanson; David Schiff; Susan C Short; Martin J B Taphoorn; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Jonathan Tsang; Roel G W Verhaak; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; Gelareh Zadeh; David A Reardon; Kenneth D Aldape; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  DNA damage in aging, the stem cell perspective.

Authors:  Taylor McNeely; Michael Leone; Hagai Yanai; Isabel Beerman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Replication Stress: An Achilles' Heel of Glioma Cancer Stem-like Cells.

Authors:  Meredith A Morgan; Christine E Canman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Nucleostemin Modulates Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma via a Tumor Adaptive Mechanism to Genomic Stress.

Authors:  Daniel J McGrail; Parnit K Bhupal; Junying Wang; Wen Zhang; Kuan-Yu Lin; Yi-Hsuan Ku; Tao Lin; Hongfu Wu; Kyle C Tsai; Kaiyi Li; Cheng-Yuan Peng; Milton J Finegold; Shiaw-Yih Lin; Robert Y L Tsai
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.852

5.  Brain Distribution of Berzosertib: An Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-Related Protein Inhibitor for the Treatment of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Surabhi Talele; Wenjuan Zhang; Danielle M Burgenske; Minjee Kim; Afroz S Mohammad; Sonja Dragojevic; Shiv K Gupta; Ranjit S Bindra; Jann N Sarkaria; William F Elmquist
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  The small molecule drug CBL0137 increases the level of DNA damage and the efficacy of radiotherapy for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Miranda M Tallman; Abigail A Zalenski; Amanda M Deighen; Morgan S Schrock; Sherry Mortach; Treg M Grubb; Preetham S Kastury; Kristin Huntoon; Matthew K Summers; Monica Venere
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  XAB2 promotes Ku eviction from single-ended DNA double-strand breaks independently of the ATM kinase.

Authors:  Abhishek Bharadwaj Sharma; Hélène Erasimus; Lia Pinto; Marie-Christine Caron; Diyavarshini Gopaul; Thibaut Peterlini; Katrin Neumann; Petr V Nazarov; Sabrina Fritah; Barbara Klink; Christel C Herold-Mende; Simone P Niclou; Philippe Pasero; Patrick Calsou; Jean-Yves Masson; Sébastien Britton; Eric Van Dyck
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  DNA damage repair in glioblastoma: current perspectives on its role in tumour progression, treatment resistance and PIKKing potential therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Mathew Lozinski; Nikola A Bowden; Moira C Graves; Michael Fay; Paul A Tooney
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 9.  Current understanding of epigenetics mechanism as a novel target in reducing cancer stem cells resistance.

Authors:  Saeedeh Keyvani-Ghamsari; Khatereh Khorsandi; Azhar Rasul; Muhammad Khatir Zaman
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 6.551

Review 10.  Genotoxic therapy and resistance mechanism in gliomas.

Authors:  Fengchao Lang; Yang Liu; Fu-Ju Chou; Chunzhang Yang
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 12.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.