Literature DB >> 29974634

Barriers and facilitators to participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials: A qualitative perspective.

Victoria Team1, Lyndal Bugeja1, Carolina D Weller1.   

Abstract

Low recruitment rates for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are a common issue. Information on barriers and facilitators to recruitment for RCTs may inform researchers on how to improve the recruitment rate. The aim of this qualitative project was to identify barriers and facilitators to participant recruitment for a randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled trial on the clinical effectiveness of aspirin as an adjunct to compression therapy in healing chronic venous leg ulcers. We have conducted interviews with health professionals and project workers to understand their perspective on low recruitment rate, barriers to, and facilitators of recruitment. NVivo 11 software was used for data management and coding. Thematic analysis was applied as a method of data analysis. Although strict recruitment criteria were the main barrier, there were other recruitment barriers that should be considered when planning RCTs. We have further developed a framework of factors influencing the recruitment rate. The main recruitment barriers, including study-related, participant-related, practitioner-related, collaboration-related, ethics-related, practice-related, and health system-related barriers, should be considered for inclusion in the "Other Information" section of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Statement to improve the quality of reporting and ensure the strategic planning of future RCTs.
© 2018 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RCTs; barriers; enablers; recruitment rate; venous leg ulcers

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29974634      PMCID: PMC7949941          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  25 in total

1.  Practical tips for surgical research: how to optimize patient recruitment.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Forough Farrokhyar; Leslie McKnight; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Enhancing enrollment in palliative care trials: key insights from a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Amy P Abernethy; David C Currow; John Wurzelmann; Stephen W Janning; Janet Bull; Johnny F Norris; Debra C Baringtang; Amy Pierce; Jerry Snidow
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2010 May-Jun

3.  Assessing the Gold Standard--Lessons from the History of RCTs.

Authors:  Laura E Bothwell; Jeremy A Greene; Scott H Podolsky; David S Jones
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Recruiting patients into a primary care based study of palliative care: why is it so difficult?

Authors:  Gail Ewing; Margaret Rogers; Stephen Barclay; Janet McCabe; Anna Martin; Chris Todd
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  Problems in publication of clinical trial methodology.

Authors:  L Lasagna
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 6.  Understanding and Improving Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Qualitative Research Approaches.

Authors:  Daisy Elliott; Samantha Husbands; Freddie C Hamdy; Lars Holmberg; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Barriers and facilitators to recruitment in mental health services: care coordinators' expectations and experience of referring to a psychosis research trial.

Authors:  Sandra Bucci; Isabelle Butcher; Samantha Hartley; Sandra T Neil; John Mulligan; Gillian Haddock
Journal:  Psychol Psychother       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.915

8.  Barriers and facilitators to patient recruitment to a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care: lessons for future trials.

Authors:  Juliet M Foster; Susan M Sawyer; Lorraine Smith; Helen K Reddel; Tim Usherwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme.

Authors:  Stephen J Walters; Inês Bonacho Dos Anjos Henriques-Cadby; Oscar Bortolami; Laura Flight; Daniel Hind; Richard M Jacques; Christopher Knox; Ben Nadin; Joanne Rothwell; Michael Surtees; Steven A Julious
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Specialist nurses' perceptions of inviting patients to participate in clinical research studies: a qualitative descriptive study of barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Caroline French; Charitini Stavropoulou
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  8 in total

1.  Barriers and facilitators to participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials: A qualitative perspective.

Authors:  Victoria Team; Lyndal Bugeja; Carolina D Weller
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Randomised controlled trials as part of clinical care: A seven-step routinisation framework proposal.

Authors:  Victoria Team; Carolina D Weller
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Understanding the perspectives of recruiters is key to improving randomised controlled trial enrolment: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Nicola Farrar; Daisy Elliott; Catherine Houghton; Marcus Jepson; Nicola Mills; Sangeetha Paramasivan; Lucy Plumb; Julia Wade; Bridget Young; Jenny L Donovan; Leila Rooshenas
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.728

4.  ELaPro, a LOINC-mapped core dataset for top laboratory procedures of eligibility screening for clinical trials.

Authors:  Ahmed Rafee; Sarah Riepenhausen; Philipp Neuhaus; Alexandra Meidt; Martin Dugas; Julian Varghese
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.612

5.  Rationale for participation in venous leg ulcer clinical research: Patient interview study.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; Catelyn Richards; Louise Turnour; Victoria Team
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Using a qualitative sub-study to inform the design and delivery of randomised controlled trials on medicinal cannabis for symptom relief in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca E Olson; Alexandra Smith; Georgie Huggett; Phillip Good; Morgan Dudley; Janet Hardy
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.728

7.  Stakeholder perspectives on barriers and enablers to recruiting anxious children undergoing day surgery under general anaesthetic: a qualitative internal pilot study of the MAGIC randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Kettle; Chris Deery; Robert Bolt; Diana Papaioannou; Zoe Marshman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  A Walking Intervention Supplemented With Mobile Health Technology in Low-Active Urban African American Women With Asthma: Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Sharmilee M Nyenhuis; Guilherme Moraes Balbim; Jun Ma; David X Marquez; JoEllen Wilbur; Lisa K Sharp; Spyros Kitsiou
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2020-03-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.