Literature DB >> 25257960

Barriers and facilitators to recruitment in mental health services: care coordinators' expectations and experience of referring to a psychosis research trial.

Sandra Bucci1, Isabelle Butcher1, Samantha Hartley1, Sandra T Neil2, John Mulligan3, Gillian Haddock1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High-quality research trials are necessary to provide evidence for the effective management of mental health difficulties, but successful recruitment can be challenging.
DESIGN: This qualitative study examines the perceived barriers and facilitators to referring mental health service users to research trials. Seven care coordinators (n = 7) who facilitated the recruitment of participants to a cognitive behaviour therapy - informed psychosis intervention trial were interviewed.
METHOD: Demographic information was collected by questionnaire and a semi-structured guide was used to explore barriers and facilitators to referring to a partially randomized participant preference trial. Qualitative data were thematically analysed.
RESULTS: Four key themes, each with a number of sub-themes, were identified: (1) engage the care coordinator in the recruitment process, (2) barriers to referring to research studies, (3) facilitators to referring to research studies; (4) organisational constraints impact on implementing research outcomes into routine clinical practice.
CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the barriers and facilitators to recruitment in mental health research could improve recruitment strategies. Our findings highlight the need for researchers' to closely consider their recruitment strategies as service users are not always given the choice to participate in research. Several key recommendations are made based on these findings in order to maximize successful recruitment to research studies. Overall, we recommend that researchers' adopt a flexible, tailor-made approach for each clinical team to ensure a collaborative relationship is developed between research staff and clinicians. PRACTITIONER POINTS: A qualitative approach to understanding recruitment challenges provides a useful opportunity to explore the barriers and facilitators to recruiting participants to research studies. These findings have practical implications that highlight the need for a collaborative partnership between researchers and clinical services. Understanding the challenges and issues related to recruitment can help researchers consider strategies to overcome recruitment issues. More research with a larger sample, across a broader population and in different mental health services is required.
© 2014 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  care coordinators; case managers; gatekeeping; psychosis; randomized controlled trial; recruitment

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25257960     DOI: 10.1111/papt.12042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Psychother        ISSN: 1476-0835            Impact factor:   3.915


  15 in total

1.  Barriers and facilitators to participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials: A qualitative perspective.

Authors:  Victoria Team; Lyndal Bugeja; Carolina D Weller
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Engaging in Late-Life Mental Health Research: a Narrative Review of Challenges to Participation.

Authors:  Jordyn Newmark; Marie Anne Gebara; Howard Aizenstein; Jordan F Karp
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-22

3.  Use of the Internet and Mobile Phones for Self-Management of Severe Mental Health Problems: Qualitative Study of Staff Views.

Authors:  Natalie Berry; Sandra Bucci; Fiona Lobban
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2017-11-01

4.  Successful recruitment to trials: findings from the SCIMITAR+ Trial.

Authors:  Emily Peckham; Catherine Arundel; Della Bailey; Tracy Callen; Christina Cusack; Suzanne Crosland; Penny Foster; Hannah Herlihy; James Hope; Suzy Ker; Tayla McCloud; Crystal-Bella Romain-Hooper; Alison Stribling; Peter Phiri; Ellen Tait; Simon Gilbody
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  What proportion of patients with psychosis is willing to take part in research? A mental health electronic case register analysis.

Authors:  Rashmi Patel; Sherifat Oduola; Felicity Callard; Til Wykes; Matthew Broadbent; Robert Stewart; Thomas K J Craig; Philip McGuire
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A screening tool for predicting gatekeeping behaviour.

Authors:  Austyn Snowden; Jenny Young
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2017-05-07

7.  Obstacles to recruitment in paediatric studies focusing on mental health in a physical health context: the experiences of clinical gatekeepers in an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Maria E Loades; Lucie Smith; Nina Higson-Sweeney; Lucy Beasant; Paul Stallard; David Kessler; Esther Crawley
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Perspectives on Recruitment and Representativeness in Forensic Psychiatric Research.

Authors:  Sven H Pedersen; Henrik Bergman; Johan Berlin; Thomas Hartvigsson
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Specialist nurses' perceptions of inviting patients to participate in clinical research studies: a qualitative descriptive study of barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Caroline French; Charitini Stavropoulou
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Will they participate? Predicting patients' response to clinical trial invitations in a pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Yizhao Ni; Andrew F Beck; Regina Taylor; Jenna Dyas; Imre Solti; Jacqueline Grupp-Phelan; Judith W Dexheimer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.