| Literature DB >> 29972415 |
Joel Alves Rodrigues1, Thales Nicolau Prímola-Gomes1, Leôncio Lopes Soares1, Tiago Ferreira Leal1, Clara Nóbrega2, Danillo Laviola Pedrosa1, Leonardo Mateus Teixeira Rezende1, Edilamar Menezes de Oliveira2, Antonio Jose Natali1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regulation of intracellular calcium (Ca2+) in cardiomyocytes is altered by hypertension; and aerobic exercise brings benefits to hypertensive individuals.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29972415 PMCID: PMC6122899 DOI: 10.5935/abc.20180113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol ISSN: 0066-782X Impact factor: 2.000
Figure 1(A) Time to exhaustion of normotensive and hypertensive before (pre) and after (post) training. (B) Running velocity during training sessions. TN: trained normotensive; TH: trained hypertensive. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of 8 animals in each group. * compared with TN (pre); # compared with TH (pre) (p < 0.05).
Body weight and ventricular weight in the study groups
| SN (n = 8) | TN (n = 8) | SH (n = 8) | TH (n = 8) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW (g) | 411.30 ± 21.51 | 447.10 ± 43.94 | 350.60 ± 21.97 | 338.90 ± 30.67 | 0.001 |
| VW (g) | 1.62 ± 0.20 | 1.49 ± 0.25 | 1.47 ± 0.17 | 1.66 ± 0.23 | 0.954 |
| LVW (g) | 1.12 ± 0.13 | 1.08 ± 0.13 | 1.18 ± 0.14 | 1.25 ± 0.15 | 0.265 |
| VW/BW (mg/g) | 3.97 ± 0.62 | 3.46 ± 0.47 | 4.19 ± 0.45 | 4.93 ± 0.80 | 0.000 |
| LVW/BW (mg/g) | 2.75 ± 0.42 | 2.42 ± 0.23 | 3.39 ± 0.39 | 3.72 ± 0.48 | 0.000 |
SN: sedentary normotensive; TN: trained normotensive; SH: sedentary hypertensive; TH: trained hypertensive; VW: ventricular weight; LVW: left ventricular weight; n: number of animals;
compared with SN;
compared with TN (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) in normotensive animals and hypertensive animals. (A) SAP pre-training vs. post-training). (B) Final SAP of the groups. SN: sedentary normotensive; TN: trained normotensive; SH: sedentary hypertensive; TH: trained hypertensive. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of 8 animals in each group. * compared with TN (pre) (A) SN (B); & compared with TN (post) (A) TN (B); # compared with TH (pre) (A) SN (B); * compared with TH-post (A) TH (B) (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Cardiomyocyte contractility in normotensive and hypertensive animals. (A) Contraction amplitude expressed as percentage of change in cell length at rest (%c.l.r.) after electrical stimulation at 1HZ; (B) time to peak concentration; (C) time to 50% of relaxation; SN, sedentary normotensive; TN, trained normotensive; SH, sedentary hypertensive; TH, trained hypertensive. Data as mean ± SD of 60-80 cells in each group. * compared with SN; # compared with SN; + compared with TH (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Intracellular Ca2+ transient levels in cardiomyocytes of normotensive and hypertensive animals. (A) Amplitude of intracellular calcium. (B) Time to peak intracellular calcium. (C) Time to 50% decay of intracellular calcium. SN, sedentary normotensive; TN, trained normotensive; SH, sedentary hypertensive; TH, trained hypertensive. Data as mean ± SD of 40-50 cells in each group. * compared with SN; & compared with TN; # compared with SN; + compared with TH (p < 0.05).
Figure 5MicroRNA-214 expression in the left ventricle in normotensive and hypertensive animals. SN: sedentary normotensive; TN: trained normotensive; SH: sedentary hypertensive; TH: trained hypertensive. Data as mean ± SD of 5 animals in each group. * compared with SN; & compared with TN; # compared with SN (p < 0.05).