Literature DB >> 25242220

Attraction of position preference by spatial attention throughout human visual cortex.

Barrie P Klein1, Ben M Harvey1, Serge O Dumoulin2.   

Abstract

Voluntary spatial attention concentrates neural resources at the attended location. Here, we examined the effects of spatial attention on spatial position selectivity in humans. We measured population receptive fields (pRFs) using high-field functional MRI (fMRI) (7T) while subjects performed an attention-demanding task at different locations. We show that spatial attention attracts pRF preferred positions across the entire visual field, not just at the attended location. This global change in pRF preferred positions systematically increases up the visual hierarchy. We model these pRF preferred position changes as an interaction between two components: an attention field and a pRF without the influence of attention. This computational model suggests that increasing effects of attention up the hierarchy result primarily from differences in pRF size and that the attention field is similar across the visual hierarchy. A similar attention field suggests that spatial attention transforms different neural response selectivities throughout the visual hierarchy in a similar manner.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25242220     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  49 in total

1.  The attentional field revealed by single-voxel modeling of fMRI time courses.

Authors:  Alexander M Puckett; Edgar A DeYoe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  How Attention Affects Spatial Resolution.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Antoine Barbot
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2015-05-06

3.  Functional MRI and EEG Index Complementary Attentional Modulations.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Spatial Tuning Shifts Increase the Discriminability and Fidelity of Population Codes in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Vy A Vo; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Computational neuroimaging and population receptive fields.

Authors:  Brian A Wandell; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Separate spatial and temporal frequency tuning to visual motion in human MT+ measured with ECoG.

Authors:  Anna Gaglianese; Ben M Harvey; Mariska J Vansteensel; Serge O Dumoulin; Nick F Ramsey; Natalia Petridou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Saccades and shifting receptive fields: anticipating consequences or selecting targets?

Authors:  Marc Zirnsak; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Spatial sampling in human visual cortex is modulated by both spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Daniel Marten van Es; Jan Theeuwes; Tomas Knapen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 9.  Visual attention mitigates information loss in small- and large-scale neural codes.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Sameer Saproo; John T Serences
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Temporal Dynamics and Response Modulation across the Human Visual System in a Spatial Attention Task: An ECoG Study.

Authors:  Anne B Martin; Xiaofang Yang; Yuri B Saalmann; Liang Wang; Avgusta Shestyuk; Jack J Lin; Josef Parvizi; Robert T Knight; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.