| Literature DB >> 29969490 |
Ying Wang1,2, Kun Liu1,2, Shoubiao Zhou1,3, Jianwen Shao1,2.
Abstract
Subfamily Cyrtandroideae (Gesneriaceae) comprises a broadly distributed group of rocky-slope herbs, with China being the center of its distributional range. The normal growth of many species within the family is particularly dependent on special habitats. Due to the paucity of molecular studies, very little is known regarding East Asian herb phylogeographic pattern. Here, we investigate the molecular phylogeography of Boea clarkeana Hemsl., a unique resurrection herb endemic to China, focusing on geographically restrictive effects of habitat distribution on evolutionary history. Variation in three chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) intergenic spacers (psbA-trnH, rps12-rpl20, and trnL-trnF), the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags (EST-SSRs) was investigated across 18 populations to assess genetic diversity, genetic structure and historical dynamics. Genetic diversity was low within populations (cpDNA, hS = 0.03, πS×10(3) = 0.17; ITS, hS = 0.16, πS×10(3) = 0.43) but high for species (cpDNA, hT = 0.82, πT×10(3) = 3.12; ITS, hT = 0.88, πT×10(3) = 6.39); 76 alleles were detected in this highly inbred species (FIS = 0.22), with a significantly low average of 1.34 alleles per locus. No cpDNA or ITS haplotypes were shared between regions. Based on cpDNA results, the Mt. Huangshan-Tianmu and Mt. Qinling-Daba haplotypes are ancestral; these two regions represent potential refugia. Although no evidence of significant retreat-migration phenomena during glacial cycles was detected, interglacial range expansion from northern Mt. Qinling-Daba was identified (121,457 yr BP). Rapid agricultural growth caused bottlenecks in many populations, especially on Mt. Huang-Tianmu. Habitat restriction and fragmentation, weak seed and pollen dispersal abilities, and long-term isolation caused by human-induced or environmental changes are considered the main causes of extinction of several populations and low genetic diversity within populations and regions. These analyses clarify the effects of habitat restriction on B. clarkeana, representing an evolutionary reference for similar gesneriads, and enrich our understanding of the molecular phylogeography of East Asian rocky-slope herbs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29969490 PMCID: PMC6029794 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199780
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Details of the samples, genetic diversity and haplotype composition of the B. clarkeana populations surveyed, based on cpDNA (psbA-trnH, rps12-rpl20, trnL-trnF), ITS and EST-SSR sequences.
| Code | Location | Longitude (°E) | Latitude | Size | EST-SSR | cpDNA | ITS | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIC | Haplotype | π×103 | Haplotype | π×103 | |||||||||||
| ZSC | T | 120°79’ | 29°40’ | 21 | 1.533 | 0.1 | 0.093 | 0.118 | 0.373 | C1,C2 | 0.15(±0.13) | 0.08(±0.07) | R1,R2 | 0.15(±0.13) | 0.24(±0.19) |
| ZTC | T | 119°44’ | 30°32’ | 18 | 1.267 | 0.076 | 0.022 | 0.096 | 0.779 | C1 | 0 | 0 | R3 | 0 | 0 |
| ZLQ | T | 118°90’ | 30°12’ | 24 | 1.267 | 0.067 | 0.056 | 0.082 | 0.338 | C2 | 0 | 0 | R2 | 0 | 0 |
| ANS | H | 118°88’ | 30°68’ | 22 | 1.667 | 0.085 | 0.025 | 0.093 | 0.744 | C2 | 0 | 0 | R3 | 0 | 0 |
| ANY | H | 118°13’ | 30°89’ | 24 | 1.333 | 0.092 | 0.125 | 0.117 | -0.051 | C2 | 0 | 0 | R1,R2,R4 | 0.39(±0.15) | 0.78(±0.33) |
| ACT | H | 117°63’ | 30°34’ | 24 | 1.533 | 0.095 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.017 | C2 | 0 | 0 | R1 | 0 | 0 |
| AQL | H | 117°49’ | 29°88’ | 24 | 1.4 | 0.088 | 0.106 | 0.105 | 0.012 | C2 | 0 | 0 | R1 | 0 | 0 |
| JGD | G | 114°56’ | 28°54’ | 24 | 1.133 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | -0.015 | C3 | 0 | 0 | R5 | 0 | 0 |
| HSP | S | 110°85’ | 31°75’ | 20 | 1.267 | 0.079 | 0.074 | 0.09 | -0.043 | C4 | 0 | 0 | R6,R7,R8 | 0.67(±0.08) | 1.51(±0.20) |
| HXS | S | 110°64’ | 31°34’ | 14 | 1.007 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0 | C4 | 0 | 0 | R8 | 0 | 0 |
| HZS | W | 110°40’ | 30°84’ | 24 | 1.4 | 0.068 | 0.036 | 0.082 | 0.607 | C4 | 0 | 0 | R8 | 0 | 0 |
| HZL | Z | 110°45’ | 29°09’ | 24 | 1.333 | 0.079 | 0.089 | 0.096 | 0.101 | C5 | 0 | 0 | R9,R10 | 0.57(±0.12) | 3.54(±0.74) |
| HYJ | Z | 110°44’ | 28°78’ | 24 | 2.333 | 0.27 | 0.278 | 0.309 | 0.121 | C5 | 0 | 0 | R11 | 0 | 0 |
| CNJ | N | 107°20’ | 29°10’ | 24 | 1.333 | 0.037 | 0.014 | 0.043 | 0.688 | C6 | 0 | 0 | R12 | 0 | 0 |
| SNX | D | 106°93’ | 32°44’ | 24 | 1.13 | 0.024 | 0.023 | 0.028 | 0.193 | C7,C8 | 0.41(±0.13) | 0.22(±0.13) | R13,R14 | 0.53(±0.08) | 1.64(±0.24) |
| SWM | D | 106°54’ | 32°57’ | 20 | 1.067 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0 | C7 | 0 | 0 | R13 | 0 | 0 |
| SLB | Q | 106°08’ | 33°58’ | 24 | 1.133 | 0.023 | 0.029 | 0.027 | -0.048 | C7 | 0 | 0 | R13 | 0 | 0 |
| SLG | Q | 105°94’ | 33°30’ | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | C7 | 0 | 0 | R13 | 0 | 0 |
| AVERAGE | 1.34 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.43 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 394 | 8 | 0.82(±0.01) | 3.12(±0.13) | 14 | 0.88(±0.01) | 6.39(±0.30) | ||||||||
Notes
a: H, Huang Mts.; T, Tianmu Mts.; G, Guan Mts.; W, Wu Mts.; S, Shennongjia Mts.; Z, Zhangjiajie Mts.; N, Nan Mts.; Q, Qinling Mts.; D, Daba Mts.
b, NA, number of alleles per locus across all populations; PIC, polymorphic information content; HO, observed heterozygosity (mean value); HE, expected heterozygosity (mean value); FIS, inbreeding coefficient; h haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; SD, standard deviation; NA, not available.
Fig 1(a) Distribution of 8 Chlorotypes of H-T, Mt. Huang and Tianmu; G, Guan Mts.; S, Shennongjia Mts.; Z, Zhangjiajie Mts.; W, Wu Mts.; WL, Wuling Mts.; N, Nan Mts.; Q, Qinling Mts.; D, Daba Mts.; DB, Mt. Dabie. (b) The TCS-derived Network of 8 Chlorotypes of Small open circles indicate mutational steps. Circle sizes represent sample sizes (n). (c) 50% Majority-Rule Consensus Neighbor-Joining Tree Obtained via Analysis of 8 Chlorotypes of Based on 1000 permutations, bootstrap values higher than 50% are indicated above branches.
Variation percentage and expansion tests based on cpDNA sequences of B. clarkeana.
| Groups | Size | Percentage of variation | Expansion parameter ( | Expansion | Tajima’s D ( | Fu’s | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among | Among populations | Within | |||||||||||
| H-T | 89 | 19.57 | 75.94 | 4.49 | 0.955 | 0.952 (0.036) | 0.952 (0.036) | 0 | - | 0.334 | 0.684 | 1.254 | 3.709 |
| H-T-G | 101 | 89.98 | 9.59 | 0.43 | 0.996 | 0.968 (0.029) | 0.986 (0.015) | 0 | - | 0.406 | 0.459 | 0.242 | 8.022 |
| Z-W-S | 60 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1(NC) | 1(NC) | 3 | - | 0.261 | 0.701 | 2.851 | 21.511 |
| WL (Z, N) | 31 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1(NC) | 1(NC) | 0 | - | 0.481 | 0.741 | 3.405 | 30.223 |
| W-S-Q-D | 90 | 98.56 | 0.29 | 1.15 | 0.989 | 0.904 (0.095) | 0.986 (0.015) | 0 | - | 0.511 | 0.663 | 3.247 | 20.055 |
| Q-D | 49 | -1.26 | 19.4 | 81.86 | 0.181 | 0.182 (NC) | 0.182 (NC) | 3 | 121 457 | 0.02 | 0.807 | -0.644 | 1.226 |
| Total | 222 | 95.89 | 3.49 | 0.62 | 0.994 | 0.964 (0.027) | 0.995 (0.004) | 39.324 | - | 0.061 | 0.124 | 0.029 | 22.282 |
Notes
a: See Table 1 for mountain codes.
b: 97.5% CI. NST, differentiation index of ordered haplotypes; GST, differentiation index of unordered haplotypes; SSD, the sum of squared deviations; HRag, Harpending’s raggedness index.
NC, not calculated.
Fig 2(a) Distribution of 14 Ribotypes in . Small open circles indicate mutational steps. Circle sizes represent sample sizes (n). (c) 50% Majority-Rule Consensus Neighbor-Joining Tree Obtained via the Analysis of 14 Ribotypes of Based on 1000 permutations, bootstrap values higher than 50% are indicated above branches.
Fig 3PCoA of 18 populations of B. clarkeana.
See Table 1 for mountain codes.
Fig 4UPGMA dendrogram depicting Nei’s (1978) genetic distances (DA) between 18 populations of B. clarkeana, based on 15 EST-SSR Loci [45].
Numbers above branches indicate bootstrap values. See Table 1 for population and mountain codes.
Fig 5Effective population size and years since a change for 18 populations of B. clarkeana, based on the MSVAR analysis.
N1, mean current population size (over loci); N0, mean ancestral population size; T, mean time (in years) since the population started to decline.