Literature DB >> 29969172

Use of machine learning to predict early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted prostatectomy.

Nathan C Wong1, Cameron Lam1, Lisa Patterson1, Bobby Shayegan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To train and compare machine-learning algorithms with traditional regression analysis for the prediction of early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospectively collected dataset of 338 patients who underwent robot-assisted prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer was examined. We used three supervised machine-learning algorithms and 19 different training variables (demographic, clinical, imaging and operative data) in a hypothesis-free manner to build models that could predict patients with biochemical recurrence at 1 year. We also performed traditional Cox regression analysis for comparison.
RESULTS: K-nearest neighbour, logistic regression and random forest classifier were used as machine-learning models. Classic Cox regression analysis had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.865 for the prediction of biochemical recurrence. All three of our machine-learning models (K-nearest neighbour (AUC 0.903), random forest tree (AUC 0.924) and logistic regression (AUC 0.940) outperformed the conventional statistical regression model. Accuracy prediction scores for K-nearest neighbour, random forest tree and logistic regression were 0.976, 0.953 and 0.976, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine-learning techniques can produce accurate disease predictability better that traditional statistical regression. These tools may prove clinically useful for the automated prediction of patients who develop early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted prostatectomy. For these patients, appropriate individualized treatment options can improve outcomes and quality of life.
© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biochemical recurrence; machine learning; predictive model; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29969172     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  21 in total

Review 1.  Current and future applications of machine and deep learning in urology: a review of the literature on urolithiasis, renal cell carcinoma, and bladder and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Simon Hein; Gerd Reis; Christian Gratzke; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Testicular salvage: using machine learning algorithm to develop a predictive model in testicular torsion.

Authors:  Mithat Ekşi; Abdullah Hizir Yavuzsan; İsmail Evren; Ali Ayten; Ali Emre Fakir; Fatih Akkaş; Kerem Bursali; Azad Akdağ; Selcuk Sahin; Ali İhsan Taşçi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 2.003

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence Applications in Urology: Reporting Standards to Achieve Fluency for Urologists.

Authors:  Andrew B Chen; Taseen Haque; Sidney Roberts; Sirisha Rambhatla; Giovanni Cacciamani; Prokar Dasgupta; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 2.766

4.  Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models.

Authors:  Hailang Liu; Kun Tang; Ejun Peng; Liang Wang; Ding Xia; Zhiqiang Chen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Urological Diseases and Management: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  B M Zeeshan Hameed; Aiswarya V L S Dhavileswarapu; Syed Zahid Raza; Hadis Karimi; Harneet Singh Khanuja; Dasharathraj K Shetty; Sufyan Ibrahim; Milap J Shah; Nithesh Naik; Rahul Paul; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Development and head-to-head comparison of machine-learning models to identify patients requiring prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Shuanbao Yu; Jin Tao; Biao Dong; Yafeng Fan; Haopeng Du; Haotian Deng; Jinshan Cui; Guodong Hong; Xuepei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 7.  Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Prostate Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI): Current and Emerging Trends.

Authors:  Michelle D Bardis; Roozbeh Houshyar; Peter D Chang; Alexander Ushinsky; Justin Glavis-Bloom; Chantal Chahine; Thanh-Lan Bui; Mark Rupasinghe; Christopher G Filippi; Daniel S Chow
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Machine learning applications to enhance patient specific care for urologic surgery.

Authors:  Patrick W Doyle; Nicholas L Kavoussi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Using machine learning techniques to develop risk prediction models to predict graft failure following kidney transplantation: protocol for a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sameera Senanayake; Adrian Barnett; Nicholas Graves; Helen Healy; Keshwar Baboolal; Sanjeewa Kularatna
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-10-29

10.  Dr. Answer AI for Prostate Cancer: Predicting Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jihwan Park; Mi Jung Rho; Hyong Woo Moon; Jaewon Kim; Chanjung Lee; Dongbum Kim; Choung-Soo Kim; Seong Soo Jeon; Minyong Kang; Ji Youl Lee
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.