Literature DB >> 34047826

Machine learning applications to enhance patient specific care for urologic surgery.

Patrick W Doyle1, Nicholas L Kavoussi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: As computational power has improved over the past 20 years, the daily application of machine learning methods has become more prevalent in daily life. Additionally, there is increasing interest in the clinical application of machine learning techniques. We sought to review the current literature regarding machine learning applications for patient-specific urologic surgical care.
METHODS: We performed a broad search of the current literature via the PubMed-Medline and Google Scholar databases up to Dec 2020. The search terms "urologic surgery" as well as "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "neural network", and "automation" were used.
RESULTS: The focus of machine learning applications for patient counseling is disease-specific. For stone disease, multiple studies focused on the prediction of stone-free rate based on preoperative characteristics of clinical and imaging data. For kidney cancer, many studies focused on advanced imaging analysis to predict renal mass pathology preoperatively. Machine learning applications in prostate cancer could provide for treatment counseling as well as prediction of disease-specific outcomes. Furthermore, for bladder cancer, the reviewed studies focus on staging via imaging, to better counsel patients towards neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, there have been many efforts on automatically segmenting and matching preoperative imaging with intraoperative anatomy.
CONCLUSION: Machine learning techniques can be implemented to assist patient-centered surgical care and increase patient engagement within their decision-making processes. As data sets improve and expand, especially with the transition to large-scale EHR usage, these tools will improve in efficacy and be utilized more frequently.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Image registration; Machine learning; Urologic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34047826     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03738-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  27 in total

1.  Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: cost comparison of immediate second look flexible nephroscopy versus expectant management.

Authors:  Jay D Raman; Aditya Bagrodia; Karim Bensalah; Margaret S Pearle; Yair Lotan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Machine Learning in Medicine.

Authors:  Alvin Rajkomar; Jeffrey Dean; Isaac Kohane
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Neural network models and deep learning.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Tal Golan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence in healthcare.

Authors:  Kun-Hsing Yu; Andrew L Beam; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 25.671

5.  Artificial Neural Network System to Predict the Postoperative Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Dariush Irani; Shima Pooyesh; Hamid Parvin; Sakineh Dehghani; Khalilolah Yousofi; Ebrahim Fazel; Fatemeh Zibaie
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Predicting the Postoperative Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Machine Learning System: Software Validation and Comparative Analysis with Guy's Stone Score and the CROES Nomogram.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Dariush Irani; Sona Tayebi; Taher Jafari Kafash; Tayebeh Shabanian; Hossein Parsaei
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 7.  Aquablation of the prostate: a review and update.

Authors:  Claus G Roehrborn; Seth Teplitsky; Akhil K Das
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.344

8.  Can we improve the prediction of stone-free status after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? A neural network or a statistical model?

Authors:  Mohamed A Gomha; Khaled Z Sheir; Saeed Showky; Mohamed Abdel-Khalek; Alaa A Mokhtar; Khaled Madbouly
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Reconciling evidence-based medicine and precision medicine in the era of big data: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Jacques S Beckmann; Daniel Lew
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Echocardiographic Pulmonary to Left Atrial Ratio (ePLAR): A Comparison Study between Ironman Athletes, Age Matched Controls and A General Community Cohort.

Authors:  Mai Tran; Agatha Kwon; David Holt; Rebecca Kierle; Benjamin Fitzgerald; Isabel Scalia; William Scalia; Geoffrey Holt; Gregory Scalia
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.241

View more
  3 in total

1.  Patient specific simulation in urology: where are we now and what does the future look like?

Authors:  Ahmed Ghazi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  A warning system for urolithiasis via retrograde intrarenal surgery using machine learning: an experimental study.

Authors:  Jinho Jeong; Kidon Chang; Jisuk Lee; Jongeun Choi
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.090

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence for renal cancer: From imaging to histology and beyond.

Authors:  Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Luisa Egen; Chanel E Fischetti; Stefano Puliatti; Gomez Rivas Juan; Mark Taratkin; Rivero Belenchon Ines; Marie Angela Sidoti Abate; Julia Mühlbauer; Frederik Wessels; Enrico Checcucci; Giovanni Cacciamani
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2022-06-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.