Literature DB >> 33439761

Lexical and Acoustic Characteristics of Young and Older Healthy Adults.

Sunghye Cho1, Naomi Nevler2, Sanjana Shellikeri2, Natalia Parjane2, David J Irwin2, Neville Ryant1, Sharon Ash2, Christopher Cieri1, Mark Liberman1, Murray Grossman2.   

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the effect of age on language use with an automated analysis of digitized speech obtained from semistructured, narrative speech samples. Method We examined the Cookie Theft picture descriptions produced by 37 older and 76 young healthy participants. Using modern natural language processing and automatic speech recognition tools, we automatically annotated part-of-speech categories of all tokens, calculated the number of tense-inflected verbs, mean length of clause, and vocabulary diversity, and we rated nouns and verbs for five lexical features: word frequency, familiarity, concreteness, age of acquisition, and semantic ambiguity. We also segmented the speech signals into speech and silence and calculated acoustic features, such as total speech time, mean speech and pause segment durations, and pitch values. Results Older speakers produced significantly more fillers, pronouns, and verbs and fewer conjunctions, determiners, nouns, and prepositions than young participants. Older speakers' nouns and verbs were more familiar, more frequent (verbs only), and less ambiguous compared to those of young speakers. Older speakers produced shorter clauses with a lower vocabulary diversity than young participants. They also produced shorter speech segments and longer pauses with increased total speech time and total number of words. Lastly, we observed an interaction of age and sex in pitch ranges. Conclusions Our results suggest that older speakers' lexical content is less diverse, and these speakers produce shorter clauses than young participants in monologic, narrative speech. Our findings show that lexical and acoustic characteristics of semistructured speech samples can be examined with automated methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33439761      PMCID: PMC8632482          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  33 in total

1.  Aging and word-finding: a comparison of spontaneous and constrained naming tests.

Authors:  M Schmitter-Edgecombe; M Vesneski; D W Jones
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.813

2.  Perceptual features of speech for males in four perceived age decades.

Authors:  D E Hartman; J L Danahuer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Discourse production and normal aging: performance on oral picture description tasks.

Authors:  P V Cooper
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1990-09

Review 4.  The aging voice.

Authors:  P B Mueller
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.761

5.  A corpus analysis of patterns of age-related change in conversational speech.

Authors:  William S Horton; Daniel H Spieler; Elizabeth Shriberg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-09

6.  Temporal characteristics of speech: the effect of age and speech style.

Authors:  Judit Bóna
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Disfluency rates in conversation: effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender.

Authors:  H Bortfeld; S D Leon; J E Bloom; M F Schober; S E Brennan
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.500

8.  Between-speaker and within-speaker variation in speech tempo of American English.

Authors:  Ewa Jacewicz; Robert Allen Fox; Lai Wei
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Spontaneous language production and aging: sex and educational effects.

Authors:  A Ardila; M Rosselli
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.292

10.  Changes in speaking fundamental frequency characteristics with aging.

Authors:  Masaki Nishio; Seiji Niimi
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 0.849

View more
  1 in total

1.  Automated Analysis of Digitized Letter Fluency Data.

Authors:  Sunghye Cho; Naomi Nevler; Natalia Parjane; Christopher Cieri; Mark Liberman; Murray Grossman; Katheryn A Q Cousins
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.