Literature DB >> 29967141

US nuclear power: The vanishing low-carbon wedge.

M Granger Morgan1, Ahmed Abdulla2, Michael J Ford3, Michael Rath4.   

Abstract

Nuclear power holds the potential to make a significant contribution to decarbonizing the US energy system. Whether it could do so in its current form is a critical question: Existing large light water reactors in the United States are under economic pressure from low natural gas prices, and some have already closed. Moreover, because of their great cost and complexity, it appears most unlikely that any new large plants will be built over the next several decades. While advanced reactor designs are sometimes held up as a potential solution to nuclear power's challenges, our assessment of the advanced fission enterprise suggests that no US design will be commercialized before midcentury. That leaves factory-manufactured, light water small modular reactors (SMRs) as the only option that might be deployed at significant scale in the climate-critical period of the next several decades. We have systematically investigated how a domestic market could develop to support that industry over the next several decades and, in the absence of a dramatic change in the policy environment, have been unable to make a convincing case. Achieving deep decarbonization of the energy system will require a portfolio of every available technology and strategy we can muster. It should be a source of profound concern for all who care about climate change that, for entirely predictable and resolvable reasons, the United States appears set to virtually lose nuclear power, and thus a wedge of reliable and low-carbon energy, over the next few decades.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SMRs; decarbonization; nuclear power; wedges

Year:  2018        PMID: 29967141      PMCID: PMC6048520          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1804655115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies.

Authors:  S Pacala; R Socolow
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Expert assessments of the cost of light water small modular reactors.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdulla; Inês Lima Azevedo; M Granger Morgan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evaluation of a proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, and solar.

Authors:  Christopher T M Clack; Staffan A Qvist; Jay Apt; Morgan Bazilian; Adam R Brandt; Ken Caldeira; Steven J Davis; Victor Diakov; Mark A Handschy; Paul D H Hines; Paulina Jaramillo; Daniel M Kammen; Jane C S Long; M Granger Morgan; Adam Reed; Varun Sivaram; James Sweeney; George R Tynan; David G Victor; John P Weyant; Jay F Whitacre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Public Perceptions of How Long Air Pollution and Carbon Dioxide Remain in the Atmosphere.

Authors:  Rachel Dryden; M Granger Morgan; Ann Bostrom; Wändi Bruine de Bruin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.000

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Nuclear energy, ten years after Fukushima.

Authors:  Aditi Verma; Ali Ahmad; Francesca Giovannini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 49.962

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.