Literature DB >> 28666078

Public Perceptions of How Long Air Pollution and Carbon Dioxide Remain in the Atmosphere.

Rachel Dryden1, M Granger Morgan1, Ann Bostrom2, Wändi Bruine de Bruin1,3.   

Abstract

The atmospheric residence time of carbon dioxide is hundreds of years, many orders of magnitude longer than that of common air pollution, which is typically hours to a few days. However, randomly selected respondents in a mail survey in Allegheny County, PA (N = 119) and in a national survey conducted with MTurk (N = 1,013) judged the two to be identical (in decades), considerably overestimating the residence time of air pollution and drastically underestimating that of carbon dioxide. Moreover, while many respondents believed that action is needed today to avoid climate change (regardless of cause), roughly a quarter held the view that if climate change is real and serious, we will be able to stop it in the future when it happens, just as we did with common air pollution. In addition to assessing respondents' understanding of how long carbon dioxide and common air pollution stay in the atmosphere, we also explored the extent to which people correctly identified causes of climate change and how their beliefs affect support for action. With climate change at the forefront of politics and mainstream media, informing discussions of policy is increasingly important. Confusion about the causes and consequences of climate change, and especially about carbon dioxide's long atmospheric residence time, could have profound implications for sustained support of policies to achieve reductions in carbon dioxide emissions and other greenhouse gases.
© 2017 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; atmospheric residence time; carbon dioxide

Year:  2017        PMID: 28666078     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  3 in total

1.  US nuclear power: The vanishing low-carbon wedge.

Authors:  M Granger Morgan; Ahmed Abdulla; Michael J Ford; Michael Rath
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reflections on an interdisciplinary collaboration to inform public understanding of climate change, mitigation, and impacts.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; M Granger Morgan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nitrogen gas produces less behavioural and neurophysiological excitation than carbon dioxide in mice undergoing euthanasia.

Authors:  Carlotta Detotto; Sarah Isler; Martin Wehrle; Alexei L Vyssotski; Regula Bettschart-Wolfensberger; Thomas C Gent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.