Literature DB >> 29963991

Drug repositioning, a new alternative in infectious diseases.

Marissa Bolson Serafin1, Rosmari Hörner2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29963991      PMCID: PMC9425657          DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2018.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1413-8670            Impact factor:   3.257


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor: There has been a significant decrease in the number of approved antibiotics in the last two decades, and in parallel, a steady increase of multidrug resistant bacteria (MDR) has been occurring. Thus, MDR have become a global issue of public health, and with this threat, the challenge to develop new antibiotics has emerged in all areas: governmental, scientific, and the private pharmacological industry. In this sense, drug repositioning has arisen as an alternative approach for the faster identification of drugs that are effective against infectious diseases. The expressions “Drug repositioning” and “drug repurposing” was first described by Ashburn and Thor (2004) in their paper “Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs”. According to the authors, this is the process to find new uses for clinically approved drugs, and this is also known as redirecting and reprofiling. Several studies have signalled that drug repositioning has advantages compared to the traditional way of seeking for active substances,[2], [4], [5], [6], [7] since pharmacological, toxicological and bioavailability data, among others, are already available. Thus, less time is spent in their development, leading to a significant reduction in costs, and it proves to be a preferred and advantageous alternative strategy to discover drugs more quickly. Other encouraging data are the success rates for repositioned drugs, which are higher when compared to new drugs, reaching 30% in the last few years. Also, together with the positive aspects of repositioning is its recent approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Comparing repurposing and use off-label, there is a similarity between these practices: a new indication of the drug, other than the usual one. However, the use outside the label goes beyond this, since it may include different age groups, dosage or route of administration. Although this is considered a legal and common application, it is often performed in the absence of adequate scientific data, and may expose patients to unrestricted and ineffective experimentation of drugs with unknown health risks. In Table 1, we present a summary of the repositioning of drugs for antibacterial treatment: examples of studies that investigate the antimicrobial activities of several pharmacological classes, including psychotropics, local anaesthetics, tranquilizers, cardiovascular drugs, antihistamines, anti-inflammatories, being these called “non-antibiotic drugs”.[10], [11], [12], [13], [14]
Table 1

Studies of repositioning non-antibiotic drugs with antibiotic effect.

DrugOriginal indicationNew indicationReference
AASNon-steroidal Anti-inflammatoryMRSAChan et al., 201710
AmitriptilineAntidepressantStaphylococcus spp.Enterococcus faecalisMicrococcus luteusBacillus spp.Shigella spp.Salmonella spp.Vibrio choleraeVibrio parahaemolyticusEscherichia coliKlebsiella pneumoniaPseudomonas spp.Proteus spp.Citrobacter spp.Providencia spp. Enterobacter cloacaeHafnia spp.Lactobacillus sporogenesMicrococcus flavusVibrio choleraeMandal et al., 201011Muthukumar and Janakiraman, 201422
AuranofinRheumatoidarthritisMRSAHarbut et al., 201523
ChlorpromazineAnti-psychoticCorynebacterium urealyticumEscherichia coliKlebsiella pneumoniaeCitrobacter freundiiMorganella morganiiAcinetobacter baumanniiHaemophilus influenzaeMoraxella catarrhalisCampylobacter jejuniStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidisStreptococcus pneumoniaeStreptococcus pyogenesStreptococcus agalactiaeEnterococcus faecalisClostridium perfringensClostridium difficileBacreroides fragilisPrevotella spp.Brucella spp.Munoz-Bellido, Munoz-Criado and García-Rodríguez, 199612Munoz-Bellido, Munoz-Criado and García-Rodríguez, 200013
ClofazimeTuberculosisMycobacterium lepraeNaylorand Schonfeld, 201424
ClomipramineAntidepressantSerratia marcescensMorganella morganiiAcinetobacter baumanniiHaemophilus influenzaCampylobacter jejuniStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidisStreptococcus pneumoniaeStreptococcus pyogenesStreptococcus agalactiaeEnterococcus faecalisClostridium perfringensClostridium difficileBacteroides fragilisPrevotella spp.Brucella spp.Munoz-Bellido, Munoz-Criado and García-Rodríguez, 200013
DisulfiramAlcoholismMRSAPseudomonas aeruginosaPhillips et al., 199125Velasco-García et al., 200626
EbselenNeuroprotectorMRSAVRSAStreptococcus spp.Enterococcus spp.Thangamani, Younis e Seleem 2015[6], [7]
EscitalopramAntidepressantKlebsiella pneumoniaeProteus mirabilisEnterobactor cloacaeStaphylococcus aureus Pseudomonas aeruginosaAkilandeswari, Ruckmani and Ranjith, 201327
FluoxetineAntidepressantCorynebacterium urealyticumHaemophilus influenzaeMoraxella catarrhalesCampylobacter jejuniMunoz-Bellido, Munoz-Criado and García-Rodríguez, 199612Munoz-Bellido, Munoz-Criado and García-Rodríguez, 200013
IbuprofenNon-steroidalAnti-inflammatoryMRSAChan et al., 201710
IproniazidAntidepressantMycobacterium tuberculosisLópez-Muñoz and Alamo, 200928
LoperamideDiarrhoeaSalmonella entericaEjim et al., 201116
SertralineAntidepressantCorynebacterium urealyticumEscherichia coliKlebsiella pneumoniaeEnterococcus cloacaeCitrobacter freundiiSerratia marcescensProteus mirabilisProteus vulgarisMorganella morganiiAcinetobacter baumanniiHaemophilus influenzaeMoraxella catarrhalisCampylobacter jejuniStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidisStreptococcus pneumoniaeStreptococcus pyogenesStreptococcus agalactiaeEnterococcus faecalisClostridium perfringensClostridium difficileBacteroides fragilisPrevotella spp.Brucella spp.Staphylococcus spp.Micrococcus luteusBacillus subtilisShigella spp.Salmonella spp.Vibrio choleraeVibrio parahaemolyticusPseudomonas aeruginosaProvidencia spp.Lactobacillus sporogenesMunoz-Bellido, Munoz-Criado and García-Rodríguez, 199612Munoz-Bellido, Munoz-Criado and García-Rodríguez, 200013Samanta et al., 201229
ParoxetineAntidepressantCorynebacterium urealyticumHaemophilus influenzaeMoraxella catarrhalesCampylobacter jejuniMunoz-Bellido, Munoz-Criado and García-Rodríguez, 199612Munoz-Bellido, Munoz-Criado and García-Rodríguez, 200013
RisperidoneAnti-psychoticCorynebacterium urealyticumMunoz-Bellido, Munoz-Criado and García-Rodríguez, 199612Munoz-Bellido, Munoz-Criado and García-Rodríguez, 200013
Simvastatin and AtorvastatinCardiovascular diseasesStaphylococcus epidermidisStaphylococcus aureusSalmonella spp.Pseudomonas aeruginosaMicrococcus luteusKlebsiella pneumoniaeEscherichia coliEnterococcus faecalisEnterobacter hormaecheiBacillus cereusStaphylococcus spp.Staphylococcus coagulase negativeMRSARampelotto et al., 2018 in press14Graziano et al., 201530
ThalidomideAnti-nauseaMycobacterium lepraeParavar and Lee, 200831

MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; VRSA, vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; AAS, acetylsalicylic acid.

Studies of repositioning non-antibiotic drugs with antibiotic effect. MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; VRSA, vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; AAS, acetylsalicylic acid. The treatment of chronic bacterial infections in immunocompromised patients with synergistic drug combinations is well established, and this procedure has been used for several years. These synergistic combinations are used because of three main advantages: expansion of the antibiotic spectrum[16], [17]; overcoming resistance; and decrease of resistance to antibiotics through their careful use.[19], [20], [21] Since repositioned non-antibiotic drugs have shown antibiotic effects among themselves as well as when used together with antimicrobials, these combinations presently consist of a useful option to overcome the problem of weak activity of individual drugs.[2], [10], [16] Based on the several studies presented, it can be inferred that the repositioning of non-antibiotic drugs with known toxicity profiles represents a promising alternative for the treatment of bacterial infections. Nevertheless, it is a consensus in the global scientific community that it is only the starting point, and additional studies regarding mechanisms of action and in vivo studies, among others, are vital for the safe use of these drugs.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  24 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial activity of psychotropic drugs: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

Authors:  J L Munoz-Bellido; S Munoz-Criado; J A Garcìa-Rodrìguez
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.283

2.  Models for the spread of resistant pathogens.

Authors:  B R Levin
Journal:  Neth J Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.422

3.  A randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole versus meropenem for complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalised adults in Asia.

Authors:  Xinyu Qin; Binh Giang Tran; Min Ja Kim; Lie Wang; Dung Anh Nguyen; Qian Chen; Jie Song; Peter J Laud; Gregory G Stone; Joseph W Chow
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 4.  Toward better drug repositioning: prioritizing and integrating existing methods into efficient pipelines.

Authors:  Guangxu Jin; Stephen T C Wong
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 7.851

5.  In-vitro activity of psychiatric drugs against Corynebacterium urealyticum (Corynebacterium group D2).

Authors:  J L Muñoz-Bellido; S Muñoz-Criado; J A García-Rodríguez
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Statins and Antimicrobial Effects: Simvastatin as a Potential Drug against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm.

Authors:  Talita Signoreti Graziano; Maria Claudia Cuzzullin; Gilson Cesar Franco; Humberto Osvaldo Schwartz-Filho; Eduardo Dias de Andrade; Francisco Carlos Groppo; Karina Cogo-Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Off-label use of medicine: Perspective of physicians, patients, pharmaceutical companies and regulatory authorities.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar Gupta; Roopa Prasad Nayak
Journal:  J Pharmacol Pharmacother       Date:  2014-04

8.  Multi-drug resistance, inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy and mortality in Gram-negative severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marya D Zilberberg; Andrew F Shorr; Scott T Micek; Cristina Vazquez-Guillamet; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Drug repurposing screens and synergistic drug-combinations for infectious diseases.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Wei Sun; Anton Simeonov
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-09       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Synergistic, collaterally sensitive β-lactam combinations suppress resistance in MRSA.

Authors:  Patrick R Gonzales; Mitchell W Pesesky; Renee Bouley; Anna Ballard; Brent A Biddy; Mark A Suckow; William R Wolter; Valerie A Schroeder; Carey-Ann D Burnham; Shahriar Mobashery; Mayland Chang; Gautam Dantas
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 15.040

View more
  2 in total

1.  Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamases and carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from fresh produce farms in different governorates of Egypt.

Authors:  Esraa A Elshafiee; Mona Kadry; Sara Mohamed Nader; Zeinab S Ahmed
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  Anti-infective properties of proton pump inhibitors: perspectives.

Authors:  Taciéli Fagundes da Rosa; Vitória Segabinazzi Foletto; Marissa Bolson Serafin; Angelita Bottega; Rosmari Hörner
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.479

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.