Literature DB >> 29963132

Nab-paclitaxel is effective against intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma via disruption of desmoplastic stroma.

Peter Mu-Hsin Chang1,2, Chi-Tung Cheng3, Ren-Chin Wu4, Yi-Hsiu Chung5, Kun-Chun Chiang3, Ta-Sen Yeh3, Chun-Yu Liu1,2, Ming-Han Chen2, Ming-Huang Chen1,2, Chun-Nan Yeh3.   

Abstract

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IH-CCA) is the second predominant hepatic malignancy worldwide. However, effective treatment strategies for IH-CCA have not yet been developed. Nab-paclitaxel may be an effective drug against IH-CCA, a type of desmoid-like tumor, and its antitumor effects may be attributable to its ability to disrupt the cancer-associated fibroblasts. In the present study, MTT and Annexin-V apoptosis detection kits were used to evaluate the efficacy of paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel against human cholangiocarcinoma KKU-100 and KKU-213 cell lines. A rat model of thioacetamide-induced spontaneous desmoplastic IH-CCA was used to compare the treatment response of four different drug regimens: Control, paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine/oxaliplatin. Positron emission tomography and immunofluorescence analysis were used to measure the tumor volume and to study the resected tumor, respectively. In vitro, paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel induced anti-proliferative effects in KKU-100 and KKU-M213 cells. With regards to the treatment regimes, only nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine/oxaliplatin induced antitumor effects in the rat model of thioacetamide-induced IH-CCA. The immunofluorescence study indicated that nab-paclitaxel was more efficient in disrupting cancer-associated fibroblasts than paclitaxel. In conclusion, nab-paclitaxel is effective against IH-CCA owing to its ability to markedly disrupt the desmoplastic stroma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer-associated fibroblast; cholangiocarcinoma; desmoplastic; nab-paclitaxel; α-smooth muscle actin

Year:  2018        PMID: 29963132      PMCID: PMC6019977          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  17 in total

Review 1.  The role of cancer-associated myofibroblasts in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Alphonse E Sirica
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Desmoplastic stroma and cholangiocarcinoma: clinical implications and therapeutic targeting.

Authors:  Alphonse E Sirica; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Gene expression-based chemical genomics identifies heat-shock protein 90 inhibitors as potential therapeutic drugs in cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ming-Huang Chen; Kun-Ju Lin; Wu-Lung R Yang; Ya-Wen Kao; Tsung-Wen Chen; Shu-Chaou Chao; Peter Mu-Hsin Chang; Chun-Yu Liu; Cheng-Hwai Tzeng; Yee Chao; Ming-Han Chen; Chun-Nan Yeh; Chi-Ying F Huang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Juan Valle; Harpreet Wasan; Daniel H Palmer; David Cunningham; Alan Anthoney; Anthony Maraveyas; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Tim Iveson; Sharon Hughes; Stephen P Pereira; Michael Roughton; John Bridgewater
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group.

Authors:  H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Desmoplasia: a response or a niche?

Authors:  Yves A DeClerck
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 7.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma progression: prognostic factors and basic mechanisms.

Authors:  Alphonse E Sirica; Catherine I Dumur; Deanna J W Campbell; Jorge A Almenara; Olorunseun O Ogunwobi; Jennifer L Dewitt
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine.

Authors:  Daniel D Von Hoff; Thomas Ervin; Francis P Arena; E Gabriela Chiorean; Jeffrey Infante; Malcolm Moore; Thomas Seay; Sergei A Tjulandin; Wen Wee Ma; Mansoor N Saleh; Marion Harris; Michele Reni; Scot Dowden; Daniel Laheru; Nathan Bahary; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Josep Tabernero; Manuel Hidalgo; David Goldstein; Eric Van Cutsem; Xinyu Wei; Jose Iglesias; Markus F Renschler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Stromal disrupting effects of nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  R Alvarez; M Musteanu; E Garcia-Garcia; P P Lopez-Casas; D Megias; C Guerra; M Muñoz; Y Quijano; A Cubillo; J Rodriguez-Pascual; C Plaza; E de Vicente; S Prados; S Tabernero; M Barbacid; F Lopez-Rios; M Hidalgo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Antitumor activity of the combination of an HSP90 inhibitor and a PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor against cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ming-Huang Chen; Kun-Chun Chiang; Chi-Tung Cheng; Shih-Chiang Huang; Yeng-Yang Chen; Tsung-Wen Chen; Ta-Sen Yeh; Yi-Yin Jan; Hsi-Ming Wang; Jiang-Jie Weng; Peter Mu-Hsin Chang; Chun-Yu Liu; Chung-Pin Li; Yee Chao; Ming-Han Chen; Chi-Ying F Huang; Chun-Nan Yeh
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-05-15
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Overcome Drug Resistance in Cholangiocarcinoma: New Insight Into Mechanisms and Refining the Preclinical Experiment Models.

Authors:  Qingfan Zheng; Bin Zhang; Changfeng Li; Xuewen Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Paclitaxel Restores Sensitivity to Chemotherapy in Preclinical Models of Multidrug-Resistant Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Annamaria Massa; Caterina Peraldo-Neia; Francesca Vita; Chiara Varamo; Marco Basiricò; Chiara Raggi; Paola Bernabei; Jessica Erriquez; Ivana Sarotto; Francesco Leone; Serena Marchiò; Giuliana Cavalloni; Massimo Aglietta
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Myofibroblastic CAF Density, Not Activated Stroma Index, Indicates Prognosis after Neoadjuvant Therapy of Pancreatic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ulrike Heger; Anna Martens; Lisa Schillings; Britta Walter; Domenic Hartmann; Ulf Hinz; Thomas Pausch; Nathalia Giese; Christoph W Michalski; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Simultaneous targeting of primary tumor, draining lymph node, and distant metastases through high endothelial venule-targeted delivery.

Authors:  Liwei Jiang; Sungwook Jung; Jing Zhao; Vivek Kasinath; Takaharu Ichimura; John Joseph; Paolo Fiorina; Andrew S Liss; Khalid Shah; Nasim Annabi; Nitin Joshi; Tomoya O Akama; Jonathan S Bromberg; Motohiro Kobayashi; Kenji Uchimura; Reza Abdi
Journal:  Nano Today       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 20.722

Review 5.  Models for Understanding Resistance to Chemotherapy in Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Jose J G Marin; Elisa Herraez; Elisa Lozano; Rocio I R Macias; Oscar Briz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.