Literature DB >> 29962272

Reducing "I Don't Know" Responses and Missing Survey Data: Implications for Measurement.

Deanna C Denman1, Austin S Baldwin1, Andrea C Betts2,3,4, Amy McQueen5, Jasmin A Tiro2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: "I don't know" (DK) responses are common in health behavior research. Yet analytic approaches to managing DK responses may undermine survey validity and researchers' ability to interpret findings.
OBJECTIVE: Compare the usefulness of a methodological strategy for reducing DK responses to 3 analytic approaches: 1) excluding DKs as missing data, 2) recoding them to the neutral point of the response scale, and 3) recoding DKs with the mean.
METHODS: We used a 4-group design to compare a methodological strategy, which encourages use of the response scale after an initial DK response, to 3 methods of analytically treating DK responses. We examined 1) whether this methodological strategy reduced the frequency of DK responses, and 2) how the methodological strategy compared to common analytic treatments in terms of factor structure and strength of correlations between measures of constructs.
RESULTS: The prompt reduced DK response frequency (55.7% of 164 unprompted participants vs. 19.6% of 102 prompted participants). Factorial invariance analyses suggested equivalence in factor loadings for all constructs throughout the groups. Compared to excluding DKs, recoding strategies and use of the prompt improved the strength of correlations between constructs, with the prompt resulting in the strongest correlations (.589 for benefits and intentions, .446 for perceived susceptibility and intentions, and .329 for benefits and perceived susceptibility). LIMITATIONS: This study was not designed a priori to test methods for addressing DK responses. Our analysis was limited to an interviewer-administered survey, and interviewers did not probe about reasons for DK responses.
CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that use of a prompt to reduce DK responses is preferable to analytic approaches to treating DK responses. Use of such prompts may improve the validity of health behavior survey research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DK responses; health behavior; methodological strategy; survey data; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29962272      PMCID: PMC6076331          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X18785159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  21 in total

1.  What number is "fifty-fifty"?: redistributing excessive 50% responses in elicited probabilities.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Paul S Fischbeck; Neil A Stiber; Baruch Fischhoff
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Stuck in the middle: the use and interpretation of mid-points in items on questionnaires.

Authors:  Joel T Nadler; Rebecca Weston; Elora C Voyles
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2015

3.  Improving question wording in surveys of culturally diverse populations.

Authors:  R B Warnecke; T P Johnson; N Chávez; S Sudman; D P O'Rourke; L Lacey; J Horm
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Using cognitive interviews to develop surveys in diverse populations.

Authors:  Anna M Nápoles-Springer; Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson; Helen O'Brien; Anita L Stewart
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Demographic influences on risk perceptions.

Authors:  I Savage
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  "I don't know" My Cancer Risk: Implications for Health Behavior Engagement.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Marc T Kiviniemi; Heather Orom; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2016-10

7.  Assessing the influence of health literacy on HIV-positive women's cervical cancer prevention knowledge and behaviors.

Authors:  Shalanda A Bynum; Lisa T Wigfall; Heather M Brandt; Donna L Richter; Saundra H Glover; James R Hébert
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  "Don't know" responses to risk perception measures: implications for underserved populations.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Jennifer L Hay; Heather Orom; Marc T Kiviniemi; Bettina F Drake
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Recovery of information from multiple imputation: a simulation study.

Authors:  Katherine J Lee; John B Carlin
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-13

10.  National, Regional, State, and Selected Local Area Vaccination Coverage Among Adolescents Aged 13-17 Years - United States, 2016.

Authors:  Tanja Y Walker; Laurie D Elam-Evans; James A Singleton; David Yankey; Lauri E Markowitz; Benjamin Fredua; Charnetta L Williams; Sarah A Meyer; Shannon Stokley
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  7 in total

1.  Specifying Future Behavior When Assessing Risk Perceptions: Implications for Measurement and Theory.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Nicole Ackermann; Courtney S Wheeler
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Adapting a self-affirmation intervention for use in a mobile application for smokers.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Amy McQueen; Nicolle Simonovic; Erika A Waters
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-03-22

3.  Dismissing "Don't Know" Responses to Perceived Risk Survey Items Threatens the Validity of Theoretical and Empirical Behavior-Change Research.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Marc T Kiviniemi; Jennifer L Hay; Heather Orom
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-11-23

4.  Knowledge of and beliefs about palliative care in a nationally-representative U.S. sample.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Erin M Ellis; Maija Reblin; Lee Ellington; Rebecca A Ferrer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Preferences of the Public for Sharing Health Data: Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Jennifer Viberg Johansson; Heidi Beate Bentzen; Nisha Shah; Eik Haraldsdóttir; Guðbjörg Andrea Jónsdóttir; Jane Kaye; Deborah Mascalzoni; Jorien Veldwijk
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-07-05

6.  Communicating carabids: Engaging farmers to encourage uptake of integrated pest management.

Authors:  Kelly Jowett; Alice E Milne; Simon G Potts; Deepa Senapathi; Jonathan Storkey
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.462

7.  Entering Research Learning Assessment (ERLA): Validity Evidence for an Instrument to Measure Undergraduate and Graduate Research Trainee Development.

Authors:  Amanda R Butz; Janet L Branchaw
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.325

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.