Literature DB >> 25832738

Stuck in the middle: the use and interpretation of mid-points in items on questionnaires.

Joel T Nadler1, Rebecca Weston, Elora C Voyles.   

Abstract

Likert-type scales are commonly used when assessing attitudes, personality characteristics, and other psychological variables. This study examined the effect of varying the number of response options on the same set of 28 attitudinal items. Participants answered items using either a 4-point scale (forced choice), a 5-point scale that included a "neither" mid-point, or a 4-point scale with an option of "no opinion" presented after the item. The questionnaire also included an item asking participants what they believe the midpoint in a scale indicated. As predicted, participants' interpretations of the midpoint varied widely with the most common responses being: "no opinion," "don't care," "unsure," "neutral," "equal/both," and "neither." The quantitative results showed that participants' levels of item endorsement varied based on the response options offered. For example, "neither" was chosen more often than "no opinion" on all of the items.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Likert scales; measurement; mid-points; questionnaires; surveys

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25832738     DOI: 10.1080/00221309.2014.994590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Psychol        ISSN: 0022-1309


  20 in total

1.  Assessing quality of life in severe obesity: development and psychometric properties of the ORWELL-R.

Authors:  José Camolas; André Ferreira; Edoardo Mannucci; Mário Mascarenhas; Manuel Carvalho; Pedro Moreira; Isabel do Carmo; Osvaldo Santos
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Acceptability of the Woman's Condom in a phase III multicenter open-label study.

Authors:  Beatrice A Chen; Diana L Blithe; Gitonga R Muraguri; Audrey A Lance; Bruce R Carr; Jeffrey T Jensen; Thomas D Kimble; Amitasrigowri S Murthy; Courtney A Schreiber; Michael A Thomas; Terri L Walsh; Carolyn Westhoff; Anne E Burke
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Assessing the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the Chinese adults using a generalized vaccine hesitancy survey instrument.

Authors:  Xin Shen; Hao Dong; Jing Feng; Heng Jiang; Rowan Dowling; Zuxun Lu; Chuanzhu Lv; Yong Gan
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Reducing "I Don't Know" Responses and Missing Survey Data: Implications for Measurement.

Authors:  Deanna C Denman; Austin S Baldwin; Andrea C Betts; Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  Towards a reconsideration of the use of agree-disagree questions in measuring subjective evaluations.

Authors:  Jennifer Dykema; Nora Cate Schaeffer; Dana Garbarski; Nadia Assad; Steven Blixt
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2021-06-24

6.  Attitudes toward Bisexual Men and Women among a Nationally Representative Probability Sample of Adults in the United States.

Authors:  Brian Dodge; Debby Herbenick; M Reuel Friedman; Vanessa Schick; Tsung-Chieh Jane Fu; Wendy Bostwick; Elizabeth Bartelt; Miguel Muñoz-Laboy; David Pletta; Michael Reece; Theo G M Sandfort
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Improving interpretation of publically reported statistics on health and healthcare: the Figure Interpretation Assessment Tool (FIAT-Health).

Authors:  Reinie G Gerrits; Dionne S Kringos; Michael J van den Berg; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-03-07

Review 8.  Instruments evaluating the self-directed learning abilities among nursing students and nurses: a systematic review of psychometric properties.

Authors:  Lucia Cadorin; Valentina Bressan; Alvisa Palese
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Universal linguistic hierarchies are not innately wired. Evidence from multiple adjectives.

Authors:  Evelina Leivada; Marit Westergaard
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Learning Strategies for First-Year Biology: Toward Moving the "Murky Middle".

Authors:  Angelique Kritzinger; Juan-Claude Lemmens; Marietjie Potgieter
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.